ipl-logo

Philosophy Of Animal Testing Essay

573 Words3 Pages

Philosophy. Rabiya Zhexembayeva
ESSAY
Animal Testing
Animal Testing plays a crucial role in the development of effective medical treatments and it helps scientists’ understanding of diseases. These days it becomes one of the controversial questions why scientists exploiting animals for humans benefit. I believe that involvement of animals in the laboratory experiments is immoral.
Animals are living beings as humans. Also, the best testing model to find a cure for a human is human itself. But, a human has a mind, moral concepts, and he has a reason to live. For instance, as human’s representative, let’s take me: I am a person, I am a student, I am a daughter for my mom, I am a sister for my sibling, and may be a mother in future for little children. Now let’s take a mouse: the mouse is a mouse for me, for you, for all others. So, it is clear that human’s life is more valuable.
Even the experiments on animals saved several lives of a human being, so it doesn’t mean that we should sacrifice an animal. According to …show more content…

However, medical researchers study animals to gain a practical knowledge about how the new inventions in medicine influence to our(both, human’s and animal’s) body, because, it has been proven that human beings and many animals have the similarities in organ systems and body processes. One of the valuable laboratory findings is the treatment of cancer, and heart diseases. So, it seems like it is not reasonable to prevent experimentations. Nevertheless, PETA organization find out lend to support to the claim that humans and animals are not comparable, so the results of animal experiments are meaningless, because it turns that even both of them have similar cancer type in brain, but the process of development of the disease and the reaction for the drugs is not the same. As PETA reports, drugs experiment on mice helps only them, not for

Show More
Related
1794 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction Animals testing have significantly contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge in general and to biomedical progress specifically. Many example showing that laboratory animals in medical development and other aspects have significantly influenced human health and reduced suffering, for example improved diagnosis of infectious disease ( Hau, J., & Schapiro, S. J. 2002). But since 1960s and 1970s, animals testing protests has gained prominence and strength, people start to argue it is moral to continue “cruel” animal testing. Animal Testing is a moral act In the rest of this article, I shall apply different concept under utilitarianism try to discuss animal testing are moral acts. It is important to notice that (1)

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

Since the emergence of bio medicine, animal testing has been a focal point of controversy. Those opposed to the use of animals in scientific studies believe that it is important for humans to treat all living things with the same respect. Animal rights activists make the argument that we should not do anything to a piglet for example, that we would not want done to our own infants. In spite of these points, animal testing is a crucial part of advancing biology, medicine and the overall welfare of human life. It is justified for scientists to have a more invasive form of research ethics towards animals as opposed to humans as the benefits far outweigh the consequences.

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

In order to keep the population and welfare of humans safe , animals should be tested on before the human population. Animal testing saves human lives and benefits society. Animal testing serves a key role in ending thousands and millions of diseases. For example, “zAnd in the1940s and 1950s, Jonas Salk and Albert Sabin experimented on research monkeys and chimpanzees to develop polio vaccines.. The polio vaccines were powerful.

Read More
2744 Words | 11 Pages

Introduction Animals testing have significantly contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge in general and to biomedical progress specifically. Many example showing that laboratory animals in medical development and other aspects have significantly influenced human health and reduced suffering, for example improved diagnosis of infectious disease (Hau, Jann, Schapiro & Steven, 2002). But since 1960s and 1970s, animals testing protests has gained prominence and strength, people start to argue is it moral to continue “cruel” animal testing. Animal Testing is a Moral Act In the rest of this article, I shall apply different concept under utilitarianism try to discuss whether animal testing are moral acts. It is important to notice that (1) in this article, applying the general idea of utilitarianism which is “the greatest happiness of greatest number” and (2) the animals testing under the rules and regulations.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

Animals have been used for testing for centuries by famous philosophers such as Aristotle, and in modern times have been a great use in aiding us to advance in finding cures for many diseases. In today, we come across many groups, such as the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), who find testing on animals to be cruel and unjust. We cannot deny that the usage of animals for experimental testing has benefit us greatly, whether its scientific or commercial. There are three various types of animal testing that are each useful in society. Scientific testing, being the most profitable, helps scientist test different cures on animals with different conditions.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Another argument give is that humans need to use animals because of need, that humans need animals be used as test subjects in order to advance the medicine that helps humans combat diseases. that animals are not capable to think and reason like humans thus they have no part in the same moral community as humans and have no rights because cannot make any decisions allowing people to justify testing on animals. What many argue is that animal testing is unethical as the notion of animals being different from humans in intelligence as being a justification is ludicrous that although they are not equal with humans moral and intelligence wise but said to be equal in genetic coding to be the reason for animals to be tested on without considering their suffering and pain. An argument that the unethical side presents is that animal are able to experience the same pain as humans as well as to have a conscious and have a common interest, not to experience pain and suffering. That philosophers like Peter Singer says that humans should consider the interests of other sentient beings and for humans to to put their own interest above those beings as it becomes

Read More
554 Words | 3 Pages

how painful that we will have to suffer? how we ourselves have to test in laboratories in place of animals? and how our heart will break when we see our beloved people die without being saved by medical method with diseases that can be removed by achievements we get from animal researches?. Now who will answer the question: Which is immoral: the testing on animals, or using our fellow human to

Read More
1866 Words | 8 Pages

Abstract Animal testing the experiments performed on animals that are used to test the effectiveness and safety of a wide range of things, from medication to cosmetics. They are also used to understand how the human body works. Animal testing is one of the major controversial issues, but animal testing has dramatically contributed to science. First, some people think that animal testing should not be used for testing medical techniques and drugs. However, medical research involving animal testing improved the health of human beings.

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated” (Mahatma Gandhi). Each year about 100 million innocent animals are killed worldwide just to enhance the quality of our lifestyle in areas like cosmetics, educational fields and curing diseases. Animal experimentation dates back to “the early Greek physician-scientists, such as Aristotle, (384 – 322 BC) and Erasistratus, (304 – 258 BC), who performed experiments on living animals because of their similar traits to humans for the sake of progressing on the understanding of our own anatomy, physiology, pathology, and pharmacology” according to Raehel Hajar from the article Animal Testing and Medicine. Some might say, that the use of animals in experiments are often not effective because animals and humans might carry similar traits but they do not carry “major types of diseases that humans would get, such as heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia” (Cruelty Free International).

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

Why do labs that create new remedies and products test on humans and animals and what are some of the effect that can be caused by this testing? When medical labs do research on illnesses and what causes them, the ultimate goal is to find a way to cure it. Scientist can isolate the chemicals in plants and animals that have the ability to cure certain ailments through research and testing. They can them make these chemicals artificially. Medicines that actually work don’t come magically.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Since the value of animal life as a living being should be recognized and to a certain extent equated to the value of human life, the animal experiments raise a range of ethical questions (Armstrong & Botzler,

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is a very serious topic. Many people argue wether or not animals should be used for testing products. There are campaigns to stop animal cruelty testing, and places like New Zealand have already banned animal testing. Places like the U.S and Canada at least have a campaign, but that’s just the beginning of ending animal cruelty. In 1966, Congress passed the Animal Welfare Act.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

There are both negatives and positives to this argument, although there has been medical discoveries which have saved lives, the lives of the innocent animals being tested on are terminated. Why aren't the lives of animals valued as much as that of a human? Solemnly because they are not able to speak English? No.

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

In spite of that, some people believe that animal testing is not essential and it should be banned because animals are different from humans physically. In addition, they believe that animal tests are a waste of time and money and there are lower cost alternative methods and more effective. Our purpose of this essay is to prove that animal testing is important and has a lot of benefits and advantages for humanity. Using animals in medical and scientific experiments is necessary, because it finds many cures and treatments, animals bodies are almost similar to the human bodies, also it benefits the animals themselves from diseases.

Read More

More about Philosophy Of Animal Testing Essay

Related Topics

Open Document