Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reasons why animal testing is wrong
Should animal testing be banned
The harm of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reasons why animal testing is wrong
Should animal testing be banned
The harm of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The new standards stated that three requirements had to be satisfied: (1) “the voluntary consent of the person on whom the experiment is to be performed,” (2) “the danger of each experiment must be previously investigated by animal experimentation,” and (3) “the experiment must be performed under proper medical protection and management” (Washington, 2006, p. 221). These standards were violated when doctors injected Elmer Allen, a black man who had escaped the South and made a good life for himself and his family in Chicago, with plutonium-238 (Washington, 2006). Plutonium-238 is an even more intensely radioactive isotope than plutonium-239, which was given to most of the other patients (Washington, 2006). Allen suffered a similar experience
Moreover, testing for cosmetics is obviously evil to animals. The fact that people take small helpless animals to torture them, so human could feel better. In the article “Animal Testing-A Necessary Evil?” Paterson reports that “Animals are also not just exposed to short periods of physical restraint but also prolonged periods. They can be deprived of food and water and wounds are inflicted, along with burns and other injuries in order to study healing.
I believe the testing of animals for beauty products is not ethical and should stop. The debate of testing on animals has been going on for a long time. Aristotle debated this by saying that we as humans were at the top of the pyramid because we have the sense of reasoning and rational souls. In the scenario we face is that the rabbits are given injections in the eyes and this is very painful for them.
Animals are being used for personal needs and used against their will so morally this seems wrong. There has been many side effects to testing that have hurt mankind so there are very good reasons to do away with animal testing. Do the pros of animal testing outweigh the cons? I believe they both cancel each other out and no matter what we do there will be a risk for reward. Seeing what animal testing has done for mankind is a major factor in this paper because it has done wonders for us in the medical field, but the cost has been equal and has hurt many.
Animal testing is a subject that has been deemed controversial for quite a long time now, and is still argued today. Now, you'll see many companies breaking from this animal testing, and making vegan products and selling almost just as well. Just listening to the word,"Animal testing" automatically makes you think of something horrible and inhumane, but there are reasons that it isn't. California Biomedical Research Association says that almost every medical breakthrough within the last 100 years has been derived from animal testing. Animals, especially those that have extremely similar DNA to ours, have been exceptionally helpful in medical research.
Most of the animals that are experimented on during testing are either terminated or held in captivity. A mistake many people make made about animals that were used for testing is that they give them up for adoption or release them in the wild this is not right and humane for many reasons most animals that are used for testing have never been in a home environment there for they would not be able to cope with people. also a animal that was being experimented on will not know how to survive in the wild because it's probably been held in captivity all of its life so it won't know how to find food and shelter and will probably end up starving to death. There are other ways animals can be handled after testing one way is they can be killed using
Testing, experimenting, assessing, and scrutinizing are apart of the procedures that harmless animals are put through every day in order to benefit the human life. What makes torturing animals with chemicals considered a good thing? Animals involved in testing include: rats, rabbits, hamsters, cats and dogs. Imagine a household pet, such as a cat or dog, being put against their will placed in chemicals with no good reasoning? Whether or not you’re human, living creature still deserve to be treated respectfully and fairly, and based on the percentages and experiments being placed on animals; there is no respect or fairness given.
Every year approximately 100 million animals are killed in the United States after or during the process of animal testing. Animals killed in these testings are mice, rats, birds, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, dogs, primates, and cats. These listing are ordered in decreasing frequency according to The Humane Society of biomedical research. The animal subjects are held captivity after the experiment whether it be injured or barely alive and countless animals are killed after use. Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study.
When I first starting doing my research relating to animal testing, I realize that there were various methods in the scientific world that could be used in this type of experimental phase such as (Alternatives to Animal Testing, 2016): organ-on-chip which are used to mimic the structure along with function of the human systems in the body, cell based test and tissue models which can be used for testing consumer products and etc. The factors concerning and dealing with animals testing has been a part of society threshold of experimental concepts for years even though people have their pros and con’s about its cruel and expensive funding ritual of doing these type of test. There are also many other non-animal systems of testing which have
Pets or Cosmetic Testers? A little girl sees a man carrying a cage with an adorable bunny and three little mice inside. She wants to take them home as she adored pets, but her daddy tells her that they must go to a science lab for experiments. Imagine being locked inside of a cage without any control. This is the life of a laboratory animal, and the sad fact is that almost all new products, from cosmetics to drugs, go through an animal experimentation phase, but are not required to.
There are people out in the world who don’t see the good things when I come to animal testing. They just look at all the negatives and think about the animals in the process of the experiments and researches. What they don’t see, is that how much they help us humans in staying alive and making special treatments. When testing the animals, they have contributed to so many cures and treatments, and sometimes the animals don’t even die. According to ProCon.org on November 2, 2017, “animal research has also contributed to major advances in understanding and treating breast cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, and etc.”
“We have cured mice of cancer for decades and it simply did not work in human beings.” -Dr. Richard Klausner, former director of the US National Cancer Institute. Animal testing is a one of the most controversial topics in the world. Animal testing is not necessary because testing the products on one species and then using the products on another species changes the results.
Animal Testing: Justifying the Science Modern advances in science and health are a result of animal experimentation. According to the California Biomedical Research Association, “Why Are Animals Necessary in Biomedical Research?” “For more than a hundred years virtually every medical breakthrough...has been the direct result of research using animals”(1). Even though this is true, organizations like PETA and others are still against the fact that animal research is good for the world. From humans better understanding life threatening diseases like cancer or HIV, to learning more about Heartworms in canines.
Should animal testing be banned? 1 Imagine spending your whole entire life in a cramped cage, just like a prisoner, no matter how fear or discomfort you were or how loud you agonize from death, there would be no family or friend to lend a helping hand to you. You even lacked the strength to truss up a chicken, having freedom of movement and control over your own life will be nothing more than a fantasy. What you were only waiting for are being injecting various types of viruses by someone or being dissected lively.
Have you ever wondered how scientists develop the medicine you take when you catch a cold? Within the lab wall, millions of actions can be taken against animals, after many years of evolution “Animal testing” remains an active argument, Animal testing has been there since late 1800 when Louis Pasteur applied his tests on chicken to develop a drug to treat pox and since then it has taken the scientific world by strike that left the humanity with numerous side effects, There’s no doubt that alternative methods are more accurate, factual and detailed even if there are scientists who still believe the complete opposite, that medical research should depend mainly on animal tests despite its physical and psychological harm. Firstly; Drugs