Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History on animal testing for a persuasive essay
History on animal testing for a persuasive essay
History on animal testing for a persuasive essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History on animal testing for a persuasive essay
The new standards stated that three requirements had to be satisfied: (1) “the voluntary consent of the person on whom the experiment is to be performed,” (2) “the danger of each experiment must be previously investigated by animal experimentation,” and (3) “the experiment must be performed under proper medical protection and management” (Washington, 2006, p. 221). These standards were violated when doctors injected Elmer Allen, a black man who had escaped the South and made a good life for himself and his family in Chicago, with plutonium-238 (Washington, 2006). Plutonium-238 is an even more intensely radioactive isotope than plutonium-239, which was given to most of the other patients (Washington, 2006). Allen suffered a similar experience
Animal Testing has been a very controversial topic for decades. Throughout history, animal testing has played a major role in leading to many new medicines and discoveries. Most of the world participates in these experiments, with the aims of achieving the most modern technologies. Animal testing needs to be continued to advance our science and medicines, and to continue to save millions of lives.
According to a study done by the FDA, ninety-two percent of drugs, which were produced from animal models, failed to be approved for regular use by humans after they were tested on humans (neavs.org). This means that the vast majority of drugs made from animal testing were not able to help humans and the suffering of those animal models was simply a waste. Elias Zerhouni, who is a medical doctor, researcher, and the former director of the National Institutes of Health, even went as far to say that animal testing has led research to stray away from being used for comprehension of human biology, and we should refocus away from animal testing to get back on track for medical progress (McManus). This shows that animal testing is not helping us understand and cure human diseases. Some people believe that such examples as the use of mice to produce Gleevec, a drug that fights cancer, is reason enough to say that animal testing benefits humans medically (amprogress.org).
Animal testing includes: force feeding or injecting animal with potentially harmful substances, removing animal 's organ to cause damage surgically. There are so many different kinds of animals are used in the testing, like dogs, rabbits and pigs. Shockingly, total percent of all testing done on rodents (rats or mice) is 87.5%(Statistic Brain). Therefore, we can see that rodents are highly affected by animal testing. Human utilizes animal to do experiment in cosmetics is because it can advance scientific understanding, like what chemical substances can whiten skin, scientists will try
Companies should reconsider the usefulness and dependency of animal testing when it comes to its benefits to humankind. There are tests called in-vitro which detect the specific toxic properties of a drug or chemical by using human cells. Due to using human cells the results will be more accurate and relevant for us. Even though animals have benefited from certain medical trials, for instance the rabies vaccination, they still have to go through harsh experiments over and over again to make sure the vaccination
Animal testing is a subject that has been deemed controversial for quite a long time now, and is still argued today. Now, you'll see many companies breaking from this animal testing, and making vegan products and selling almost just as well. Just listening to the word,"Animal testing" automatically makes you think of something horrible and inhumane, but there are reasons that it isn't. California Biomedical Research Association says that almost every medical breakthrough within the last 100 years has been derived from animal testing. Animals, especially those that have extremely similar DNA to ours, have been exceptionally helpful in medical research.
As part of the health products regulation module we must discuss an ethical issue. In this essay I will discuss the issue of testing on animals and deliberate whether it is right or wrong. The concept of ethics will be talked about and what people really think of it. Does ethics come into everyday life? What would you do if nobody was looking?
Animal testing has been a controversial topic for generations. Is it alright to test new medication and risk the lives of innocent animals to help the future of human health? In this paper, we will research this topic, looking at both the pros and the cons, and at the end I will give you my opinion on the topic. We’ll look at the positives first. It has helped scientists discover many new cures and treatments for diseases.
Test conducted on animals have been used for testing medicines, surgeries, and vaccines. The information we retrieve from these test determine if it’s safe to give out these products to the public or not. Animals like mice have shorter life cycles allowing scientist to see how it affects one over their entire life span. Animal testing has saved multiple humans lives, and made helpful vaccines, like the polio vaccine.
The topic for today would be that if animal testing should be stopped. I would like to stand with the pro side because animal cruelty is a very serious problem to animal kind today. They can be argued with several reasons such as, it is cruel and inhumane treatment, it can lead to misleading research, and plenty of animal lives are wasted and we do not want to raise it higher. My first argument should be that it is cruel and inhumane acts or treatment.
Animals and other lifeforms are constantly used to test products we as consumers use daily. However, the ethics and morality of this process is questioned by medical professionals and renowned scientists. Although essential to research labs, animal activists continue to fight for the removal of the so-called cruel testing. When in reality, mammals and other organisms should remain as our main subject because these creatures have provided us with extravagant breakthroughs in 21st century consumables and prescriptions. Living animals are used in testing to help put things like hygiene products and other consumables on the shelves of our favorite stores (The Surprising Pros).
2.0 Body Content 2.1 Reduction A way of justifying animal testing is to reduce the number of animals involved in animal testing. In 1970s, 5.5 million of various animals including chimpanzees, dogs, mice, rabbits, monkeys etc. are involve in the medical research field as test subjects for various experiments (PETA, 2014). However, some experiments were not beneficial to the development of the medical field but cost over a million dollar. In the United States of America, 16 billion dollars had been used on animal experimentation- 1.9 million dollars are used on the experimenting on heart diseases on dogs conducted by Ohio State University, 5 million dollars were used on obesity experiments conducted by Oregon National Primate Research Centre, while 16 million dollars were used by Harvard University to fund 1200 individual experiments on drug addiction by using monkeys as test subjects. Although animals were sacrificed in the experiments, most experiments did not reach its goal due to flaws causing a waste of life (Grant, 2013; Peta, 2014).
Animal testing simply means the use of non-human animals in experiments, which indeed arouse great controversy in recent years. More and more people think that human being’s benefits can’t outweigh animals’
“More than 100 million animals are poisoned, burned, crippled, and abused in other ways in U.S. labs each year” (“Top Five Shocking”). Animal testing has become a deeply divided subject, with strong justification supporting each side. The debate regarding the ethics of this controversial practice is ongoing. Supporters of animal experimentation argue the viewpoint in which it must continue because of the enormous scientific research that animal models provide. Others, however, insist that all animal experimentation should come to an end.
Throughout each year in the United States, 26 million animals are used in lab testing (animal-testing.procon.org). In the laboratories, chemicals, in which are used in medical facilities and used by humans, are put on animals to determine if that certain chemical is toxic and or if it is safe for humans to handle it. Most of the chemicals used for testing are chemicals that are used in everyday products such as, paint, household cleaners, or dyes. A great deal of people sees the positives on animal testing; however, there are many reasons as to why lab testing on animals should be illegal in the United States. The first reason is because countless facilities mistreat lab animals and it can be considered as animal abuse.