ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

1273 Words6 Pages

Animal testing, sometimes called vivo testing or animal experiment, is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. They are widely conducted in labs, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry. Animal testing is mainly used for testing, breeding, defense research, and toxicology, including cosmetics testing. Those experiments are mainly risky for animals, sometimes even kill testing subjects, which caused protest from some organizations like WAP (World Animal Protection). In 2012, one of the biggest animal farm for Animal testing called Green Hill was closed under stress of …show more content…

Living systems like human beings and animals are unrepeatable. Studying cell cultures in a petri dish, does not always provide interrelated processes occurring in the central endocrine system, nervous system, and immune system. A circulatory system is necessary for evaluating a drug for side effects because such experiment needs to carry the medicine to different organs. Also, conditions such as high blood pressure and blindness cannot be studied without a living system. Computer models can only be reliable if accurate information gleaned from animal research is used to build the models in the first place. Furthermore, even the best supercomputers are unable to accurately simulate the workings of complex organs such as the brain or an unpredictable gene mutation. Should notice that Animals are most appropriate research subjects because they are similar with human beings in many ways. For example, Chimpanzees and humans have about 99% similar DNA, and share 99% of their DNA with humans. All mammals, including humans, are descended from common ancestors, and all have the same set of organs (heart, kidneys, lungs, etc.) that function in almost the same way with the help of a bloodstream central nervous system and central nervous system bloodstream. To think from another angle, animals are used in cases to prevent the use of human subjects. It would be unethical to perform invasive …show more content…

If vaccines were not tested on animals, millions of animals would have died from rabies, distemper, feline leukemia, infectious hepatitis virus, tetanus, anthrax, and canine parvo virus. Treatments for animals developed using animal testing also include pacemakers for heart disease and remedies for glaucoma and hip dysplasia. Animal testing has also been instrumental in saving endangered species from extinction, including the black-footed ferret, the California condor and the tamarins of Brazil. Koalas, ravaged by an epidemic of sexually transmitted chlamydia and now classified as endangered in some regions of Australia, are being tested with new chlamydia vaccines that may stall the animal's disappearance. The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) endorses animal testing. Also, Animal welfare and scientific quality where the use of animals cannot be avoided. According to The Three Rs principle, which is first described by W. M. S. Russell and R. L. Burch in 1959, known as Replacement (Methods which avoid or replace the use of animals in research), Reduction (Use of methods that enable researchers to obtain comparable levels of information from fewer animals, or to obtain more information from the same number of animals), Refinement. (Use of methods that alleviate or minimize potential pain, suffering or distress, and enhance animal welfare for the animals used). In many countries, these 3Rs are now

Show More
Related
1319 Words | 6 Pages

Hello there Doctor, My name is Harold Mitchell or Mitch and I have a concern about my one close friend named Blanche. Blanche is someone who I met when she was visiting her sister, Stella. Blanche was a single lady who came from the small town of Laurel and decided to move in with her sister for a few months after having a past few months back in Laurel. Blanche and I became very close and had a few romantic encounters, but I am not going to marry her.

Read More
643 Words | 3 Pages

And nearly every Laureate in Physiology or Medicine has relied on animal data for the research. The big question is, if we were to take away the animal testing, and take away what we, and scientist rely so heavily on, where does that leave us? Our technologies, our vaccines, our antibiotics, organ transplants, dialysis, blood transfusions, all nothing, never discovered. The essential need for animal research is recognized and supported by health agencies all over the world. Without it, a big portion of the world population today would not have had the privilege to walk this earth.

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

-Scientists have a specific responsibility to evade unnecessarily and minimize the pain in the treatments (replacement reduction refinement 3Rs). (Gannon,2007,p.519,para.4). Source 3 The ethics of animal research (Simon festing and Robin Wilkinson) -Implementation of laws that enables people to know more about the researches -The conducted regulated and controlled animal researches in addition to the implementation of the 3Rs and the use of compute models, human cell lines helped to lower our reliance on animals ” Approximately 2.7 million regulated animal procedures were conducted in 2003 in the UK—half the number performed 30 years ago”(Festing &Wilkinson,2007,p.528,para.3). -There exist solution to reduce animal testing like the use of cell culture based tests and Microdosing techniques , the inherent limitation of some non animal tests, and good experimental design and many others techniques like cooling and magnetic resonance thathelps to reduce the use of animals.

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

In the article, scientists created “Silico Modelling.” Although machines may never function like a rat, computer simulation has had success in testing diseases, drugs, and chemicals. Another replacement for live animals was discovered, which saved “1,000 rats and 100 dogs,” the same article proudly claims. Through the chemosynthetic liver, scientists were able to discover a harmful metabolite that saved millions of dollars and proportionate research. These devices are an effective way to test because they are completely harmless.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

According to Biology online, Animal testing is defined as using animals in experiments and development projects usually to determine toxicity, dosing and efficacy of take a look at capsules before proceeding to human scientific trials. Animal experimentation has been functioning since ancient Greece when Aristotle and Hippocrates first made their model of the human body based on what they had observed via animal dissection. Similarly, Romans used animals to do greater medical assessments on animals like pigs, monkeys and dogs. After that, the age of the Renaissance continued medical research. “As such, the 20th century had a large boom in animal experimentation until 1980 when activists commenced standing up against the labs (Branson)”.

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

Since that was the case, the procedures also work on animals. Theses vaccines and procedures are also saving animal lives. Another example is, “ Vaccines, antibiotics, anesthetics, surgical procedures, and other approaches developed in animals for human use are now commonly employed throughout veterinary medicine. ”Most people who want animal testing to end, want animals to be healthy and not being harmed. They also think that humans are the only ones who benefit from this.

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

There are over 26 million animals being used for scientific and commercial testing each year in the United States. Animals are being used for developing medical treatments, checking the safety of a product, and seeing the toxicity of medication before human use. Animal testing has contributed to many life saving medications, however animal testing is inhumane and cruel. Animals used in testing are put in experiments where there is force feeding, food and water deprivation, the infliction of wounds, physical restraint, decapitation, and many other inhumane acts. Alternative testing methods now exist that can replace the use of animals being used for scientific and commercial testing.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

If there are other methods other than experimenting on animals, then it is more logical to use them so that animals do not get harmed. By using different methods, animal experimentation could decrease or cease to exist, since there may be opportunities for growth in new, accurate methods. Some companies and institutions have started replacing animal experimentation with artificial human skin or other methods, and their results are still the same or better. The fact that new methods have “sparked quite a revolution in biology” means that countless amount of people can invent methods that surpass animal experimentation results. There should be acknowledgment that animal experimentation may be necessary sometimes, but most of the time, they can easily be replaced by other tests.

Read More
1461 Words | 6 Pages

According to the Humane Society, registration of a common pesticide requires more than 50 experiments and the use of as many as 12,000 animals. Animal testing is the practice of the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of drugs. The practice of animal testing has multiple sides, and explanations which

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

Animal Testing Every year more than one hundred million animals are tortured, burned, crippled and more ("New England Anti-Vivisection Society.") due to the cruel reality we call animal testing. Animal testing is when we test products and harmful, toxic chemicals on innocent animals to see if they are safe for human use (“Animal Testing.”). There are other alternatives but for some reason, many companies think killing and harming poor animals is the best way to know if something is okay to use. Animal testing should be stopped because it is inhumane, cruel, and it violates animals rights.

Read More
142 Words | 1 Pages

Every year about 19,500,000 animals not including rats and mice are put to death in 2017 due to animal testing, 13,400,000 of these animals are either Cats or dogs,”(Statistics Brain)”, Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, animal research, and in is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. Animal experimentation is regulated by the “Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (AWA), and the Animal Welfare Regulations which is enforced by the Animal Care division of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).” Ironically, “ in the USA rats, mice, fish, amphibians and birds are not

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing, also recognized as animal experimentation, animal research, and in vivo testing, is the use of non-human animals in experiments. The universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies and farm where the research is conducted. It includes pure research, such as genetics, developmental biology, and behavioral studies as well as applied research like biomedical research, drug testing, including cosmetics testing. Although humans get benefit from animal research, the pain and the deaths of animals are not worth the possible human benefits. I think animals should not be used for research or to test the safety of products.

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

Encyclopedia Britannica defines vivisection as “operation on a living animal for experimental rather than healing purposes; more broadly, all experimentation on live animals” (1). Recently, animal rights activists and some anti-vivisection organizations have been actively opposing the use of animals in laboratory experiments, thus sparking controversial debates on whether animal experimentation should be continued. With the rise of the antivivisection

Read More
144 Words | 1 Pages

However, many people are against the animals testing. They consider using animals for research is inhumane and wastage of animals. Instead of using animals, people should go for the alternatives to discover the drugs. Killing, and poisoning the animals in the name of research is unacceptable. William Russell and Rex Burch in 1959 book, The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique states, “intimate relationship between humanity and efficiency in experimentation"—i.e.

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

The chips can be used in disease research and drug testing. They have shown to replicate human physiology and disease more reliably than animal experimentation has. Today, there are a wide variety of tests that can be used to find out the safety of different drugs and cosmetics. In computer modeling, researchers have found a wide range of computer models that can simulate human biology. Many studies have shown that these tests can accurately predict if a drug will positively or negatively affect a person.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document