Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Animal testing, sometimes called vivo testing or animal experiment, is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. They are widely conducted in labs, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry. Animal testing is mainly used for testing, breeding, defense research, and toxicology, including cosmetics testing. Those experiments are mainly risky for animals, sometimes even kill testing subjects, which caused protest from some organizations like WAP (World Animal Protection). In 2012, one of the biggest animal farm for Animal testing called Green Hill was closed under stress of

Living systems like human beings and animals are unrepeatable. Studying cell cultures in a petri dish, does not always provide interrelated processes occurring in the central endocrine system, nervous system, and immune system. A circulatory system is necessary for evaluating a drug for side effects because such experiment needs to carry the medicine to different organs. Also, conditions such as high blood pressure and blindness cannot be studied without a living system. Computer models can only be reliable if accurate information gleaned from animal research is used to build the models in the first place. Furthermore, even the best supercomputers are unable to accurately simulate the workings of complex organs such as the brain or an unpredictable gene mutation. Should notice that Animals are most appropriate research subjects because they are similar with human beings in many ways. For example, Chimpanzees and humans have about 99% similar DNA, and share 99% of their DNA with humans. All mammals, including humans, are descended from common ancestors, and all have the same set of organs (heart, kidneys, lungs, etc.) that function in almost the same way with the help of a bloodstream central nervous system and central nervous system bloodstream. To think from another angle, animals are used in cases to prevent the use of human subjects. It would be unethical to perform invasive

If vaccines were not tested on animals, millions of animals would have died from rabies, distemper, feline leukemia, infectious hepatitis virus, tetanus, anthrax, and canine parvo virus. Treatments for animals developed using animal testing also include pacemakers for heart disease and remedies for glaucoma and hip dysplasia. Animal testing has also been instrumental in saving endangered species from extinction, including the black-footed ferret, the California condor and the tamarins of Brazil. Koalas, ravaged by an epidemic of sexually transmitted chlamydia and now classified as endangered in some regions of Australia, are being tested with new chlamydia vaccines that may stall the animal's disappearance. The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) endorses animal testing. Also, Animal welfare and scientific quality where the use of animals cannot be avoided. According to The Three Rs principle, which is first described by W. M. S. Russell and R. L. Burch in 1959, known as Replacement (Methods which avoid or replace the use of animals in research), Reduction (Use of methods that enable researchers to obtain comparable levels of information from fewer animals, or to obtain more information from the same number of animals), Refinement. (Use of methods that alleviate or minimize potential pain, suffering or distress, and enhance animal welfare for the animals used). In many countries, these 3Rs are now