ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Distributive Leadership

1346 Words6 Pages

A leader is the person who drives his/her followers to a certain goal. There are different reasons and motivations for people to follow another person. The motivation of the leader or the leadership style is also different in different cases. This paper aims to explain leadership traits and provide pros and cons of charismatic leadership and distributive leadership. Distributive leadership can also be referred as democratic leadership. Both styles have their own benefits and shortcomings. For this reason, different styles are more efficient different situations. For instance, charismatic leaders might be more influential in politics whereas democratic leaders might be more innovative in business. There are certain traits in a leader according …show more content…

Usually, charismatic leaders not only inspire their followers but also their opponents as well. Charismatic leaders use their body language as well in their speeches because nonverbal language is one of the most important parts of charisma. Shamir et al. argue that charismatic leaders usually refer to history to give meaning to their actions and set goals for their followers. Moreover, they give examples from the lives and actions of former charismatic leaders to rationalize their own actions. In Jackson’s speeches, there are references to Kennedy and Carter. Another important reference in the speech of a charismatic leader is the reference to collective identities. It is important for the linkage between the follower and the leader towards a common goal. However, it has to be a wide and inclusive identity. For instance, a black leader like Jackson, refer to a rainbow to define American nation. Moreover, charismatic leaders refer to values and moral justifications while giving hope to their followers and referring to faith. The charisma of a leader is directly related to his image in the minds of his followers. He had to be reliable and the followers should have faith in him. To sum up, charismatic leaders need to understand their followers and should create common goals where they link themselves to them with self consistency and self …show more content…

Sometimes, this might be the negative side of charismatic leadership. Moreover, if he is so ambitious, he might put his personal goals before his purpose. For example, a charismatic leader might easily turn into a dictator if he believes that majority of the people support him for no matter what. A charismatic leader should be able to differentiate his personal goals and his duties. There is another potential problem for charismatic leaders. If they do not delegate their tasks because of their over-trust in themselves and lack of trust in others, they might be overwhelmed with their tasks and can be affected negatively. Moreover, the systems may get into a deadlock after the charismatic leader is gone. It might not always be possible to replace a charismatic leader with another one. For this reason, distributive or democratic leadership might be a good alternative where more than one person takes

Show More
Related
154 Words | 1 Pages

Seth Marshall Professor: Messersmith Comp 2 2/22/16 Different Leadership Styles All people have different opinions on how a leader should handle things. Such as war, people, poverty, and even themselves. Both Machiavelli in “The qualities of the prince” talks about on how a prince is supposed to be a leader and that good leaders must learn not to be convenient or compassionate to keep stability. Lao Tzu in “Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching” believes in having a silent leader so the people will do what he wants them to do and fill like they are not being guided.

Read More
326 Words | 2 Pages

Not all leadership styles are the same, especially when supporting different messages. A perfect example would be Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X, as both were great leaders of the Civil Rights Movement but both supported different ideas, and with different ways of supporting those ideas. In his “I Have a Dream” speech at the March on Washington in 1963, Dr King had a very optimistic and inspirational tone. He used things like imagery to support the idea of reaching racial equality through integration instead of segregation. Dr. King grew up living in a very loving and stable home.

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

These leadership styles will not comprise on their character. Both leadership displays relationship with people or followers. They rely on their personal charisma to get things done. Authentic leaders are positive, they are transparent with their followers and have a sense of themselves (Yaacoub, 2018). These leaderships lead because of their own personal

Read More
1516 Words | 7 Pages

Laissez-Faire leadership, otherwise called delegative leadership, is a sort of leadership style in which leaders are hands-off and permit bunch individuals to settle on the choices. Scientists have found that this is by and large the leadership style that prompts the most reduced profitability among gathering individuals. Managers and administrators who receive the Laissez-Faire leadership style delegate obligation regarding the achievement of work targets and choice making energy to their representatives. On the inverse end of the range is the Laissez-Faire leadership style, which is to a greater extent a hands-off methodology. A Laissez-Faire leader gives others the correct instruments and assets required, and after that backs off, giving

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP Transformational Leadership is defined as leadership style focused on effecting revolutionary change in organizations through a commitment to the organization’s vision. (Sullivan & Decker, 2001) Transformational leaders are usually given higher position and are known for their charismatic sense and ability to develop high visions and regards in the work they do. They often give their best performances due to the low morale or self esteem Example: Steve Job, Bill Gates and Ratan Tata. As the existentialist rightly said, we always have a choice, in doing what we already have done or doing that which we have never done.

Read More
1521 Words | 7 Pages

However, while according to different authors, “It’s true that no amount of training or practice will turn you into Churchill or Martin Luther King Jr.”, the charismatic training “can make you more charismatic in the eyes of your followers, and that will invariably make you a more effective leader.” (Antonakis, Fenley, & Liechti, 2012) Conclusion If you add up all the basic properties of charisma, the main factors are the following: the ability of the leader to stand out from the crowd, emphasizing its uniqueness, unity of the followers, and finally, to the loyalty of the masses to the leader. Despite the exclusivity of the leader and his difference from the masses, they must have something in common that unites them: it may be a common enemy,

Read More
1924 Words | 8 Pages

Leadership Analysis Introduction One of the popular definitions of a leader is, "The only definition of a leader is someone who has followers." ( ) A more comprehensive definition that highlights striking features of a leader is, "A simple definition of leadership is that leadership is the art of motivating a group of people to act towards achieving a common goal.” ( ) A closer scrutiny of the characteristics of an influential leader would many ways assist one, in recognizing those attributes in an attempt to assimilate the best in others.

Read More
694 Words | 3 Pages

Among other things, it predicts that directive leadership is effective with ambiguous tasks, that supportive leadership is effective with repetitive tasks, that participative leadership is effective when tasks are unclear and subordinates are autonomous, and that achievement-oriented leadership is effective for challenging tasks. By taking the Path-Goal Leadership Questionnaire, I know that which way suit me to lead my followers. In my case, I score 27 in participative, which is the highest of four options. As a participative leader, I do reference the suggestions from the followers for making decisions sometimes but not always. Sometimes the leaders’ behaviors depend on the characteristic of the subordinates and tasks.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

What does it mean to take a distributed perspective? Distributed leadership is one form of leadership. It highlights leadership as an emergent property of a group networking of interacting individuals. The concept of distributed leadership has swept through the theory and practice of educational leadership. It has become the theory of choice for many (Lumby, 2013).

Read More
1818 Words | 8 Pages

This paper will examine the three leadership theories, identify how they apply to my practice, and explore how these theories interact with each other. The Trait Leadership Theory is based on the belief that a person is born with special traits contributing to natural leadership abilities. Studies of famous historical leaders have been used to identify various traits for this theory. Although the list of traits differs from study to study, there are five major traits that are consistent throughout most studies.

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

This model states that in this 21st century, it is impossible to rely on one management style to fit all situations (Educational-business-articles.com, 2016). In other words managers and leaders must be flexible, in order to get the best result out of their teams and individuals. In addition, this theory allows management and leadership to be able to identify and accurately diagnose the situation and vary employees’ behavior accordingly to the situation (Yukl and Mahsud, 2010). This will enable management and leadership at CIBCFCIB to select appropriate types of leadership behavior for each type of situation. Moreover, another impact that this theory has on organizational strategy whereby Charismatic leaders at CIBCFCIB can minimize various types of behaviour by increasing competent employees.

Read More
1095 Words | 5 Pages

Charismatic can be learnt. Uncle Lim had the ability to bring the people together. The people willingly did everything for him and followed him where he shared it in his book, “If you build a successful business and organization, always believe that the most valuable asset of a company is its people. It is the people that make up the organization. It is the people that run the organization.

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

This paper is going to encompass different leadership theories and their relevance to my own personal personality and method of leadership. There will be information on the advantages and disadvantages of the leadership theories and information on each including examples. The purpose of this paper is to view various kinds of leadership theories and apply them to a real-life scenario. Leadership Theories There are quite a few different leadership theories available for people to take information from and use in business settings and even personal settings.

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

Bass and Avolio (1993) pointed out that leadership style is based on behavior areas from laissez-fair (no leadership) to participative (take inputs from subordinate but ultimate decision making with the leader) through transactional leadership (which depends on reward system and punishments) to transformational leadership (which is based on inspiration and behavioral charisma) and ultimately Autocratic leadership (absolute power on decision making). The researcher selected above approach since it has been developed recently and efficiently demonstrated through research findings. The various components are further elaborated below; 1. Laissez-fair Style Laissez-fair leaders are characterized as an avoidant leader who may uninvolved with their subordinates. As per Mondy and Premeaux (1995), these leaders let group members to make all decisions.

Read More
1479 Words | 6 Pages

Introduction At the present competitive world leadership is a dynamic process where influencing others is the most important issues. That’s why exercising power is one of the most important issue to be a charismatic leader and this power doesn’t come automatically it comes after advocating other fellow members. Here, one thing is most important to remind that the power should be imposed and exercise within the worth and boundaries of the leaders. However organization’s culture, its mission, vision, short-term strategies all these reform the leadership process.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Distributive Leadership

Related Topics

Open Document