ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Paying Student Athletes

1410 Words6 Pages

Making Distribution Fair and Ethical
One solution can be the way the NCAA will go about distributing money. The money given to college athletes will vary. Not every athlete at every school will be getting the same exact amount of money. The amount of money will depend on what school the athlete attends, or how big the university is. It will also depend on how much revenue the specific sport brings to the university. Lastly, the money will be impacted by the amount of scholarship you are on.
For example, a football player at the University Of Alabama will have a better income than a football player at the University of South Dakota. This is because Alabama is a bigger university and they generate way more ticket sales. The university will …show more content…

Below is a proposed plan on how student-athletes can be paid.
Mr. Nocera proposed a plan on the salary cap is a brilliant idea. The salary cap is going to limit schools on the amount of money each athlete will be able to receive. It’s agreeable that the number of scholarships should be dropped, if athletes are going to be getting compensated for playing. Below is Nocera’s proposed plan on the salary cap and how the number of scholarships should be decreased:
Every Division I men’s basketball and the football team would have a salary cap, just as the pros do — except the amounts would be vastly lower. In basketball, the cap would be $650,000. In football, it would be $3 million. It is ludicrous to argue that the Power 5 programs cannot afford this; the combined $3.65 million is barely half the $7 million that Michigan Coach Jim Harbaugh made this season. (The number of scholarships in college football will drop to 60, which is closer to the size of an N.F.L. team, from 85 in the top tier.)(Nocera, …show more content…

Compared to the men’s basketball team that brings in only $5.1million dollars, and the women’s basketball team that brings in $3 million (Casagrande, 2018). This will affect the amount of money each athlete and each sport gets back. If college athletes were to be paid each football player would make roughly $463,636.36, each men’s basketball player, $318,750.00, and each women’s basketball player, $214,285.71. The amount will vary after looking into how much of a scholarship you are on. You can choose to get the same amount of money back as a player on full scholarship. Athletes could also have the option to use the money to take care of the remaining balance of your schooling, or you have the option to take the money in

Show More
Related
1433 Words | 6 Pages

This amount does not have to be tens of thousands but could just be hundreds on top of everything the athletes get now. If you set the football cap at 3 million and basketball at 650,000 thousand that would still not equal the amount that a lot of coaches of major programs make so it is affordable according to Nocera. If you take some of the money programs spend on facilities to try and recruit players that war and spend it on the salary cap it is affordable and could happen without breaking the bank. Nocera also agrees with Wilbon because he thinks an athlete should be able to use the Olympic model to make some income if they can. Nocera also says that a players’ scholarship for the education should be available for eight years so if the player goes pro and gets hurt and cannot play or does not make it they can come back and get

Read More
1376 Words | 6 Pages

Over 80% of the revenue comes from television and marketing rights fees. That means over 80% of the money comes from the moments the players show their skills and entertain their audience. Ken Reed, of the Huffington Post, wrote an article saying that the compensation for college athletes is not as simple as many people might think. Questions get raised such as, how should the wealth be divided? How will non-revenue sports be dealt with?

Read More
1513 Words | 7 Pages

On the other hand, NBA players come out on national television and get paid millions for performing the same task as collegiate athletes. although college athletes are said to receive scholarships, it is usually averaged to be around $25,000 which truly does not cover for all expenses.

Read More
1299 Words | 6 Pages

According to Michael Wilbon of ESPN said that the NCAA signed a contract with CBS Sports that spans from 2011-2024 and costed the NCAA $10.8 billion. That contract will pay the NCAA about $830 million dollars per year. So the profit for NCAA is at least $1 billion dollars in a span of 3 weeks of basketball. So where does this money go obviously it goes somewhat to the players but it mainly goes to the university, I think athletes should directly get that money so they can pay for stuff that they need during their time at college. According to Joe Nocera of the New York Times, if college athletes were paid there might be a less likely chance of scandals like the one at Miami University.

Read More
1877 Words | 8 Pages

Athletes do a lot of training and not all students are able to play the game. Some argue that they should not be paid because they are just amateurs and if paid, they will become professional players. Having the student-athletes spend their time in the classroom and in the field playing, how many of them will get a job? However, some claim that they are being given a scholarship, but it does not cover everything. This is evident especially when the college athletes cannot afford to bring their parents to the stadium to watch their children while playing.

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

The argument about college athletes, to pay or to not pay, has been an ongoing debate for a long period of time. The NCAA, or National College Athletics Association, was founded by President Roosevelt in 1905, with the idea of paying salaries to the athletes who were a part of this organization in mind (Top 10). But, since 1905 the NCAA has made millions and millions of dollars off of their athletes, as well as other things such as TV marketing and advertising, but still continue not to pay them because it's “against their tradition”. It may be against the long running tradition of the NCAA, but something needs to change.

Read More
587 Words | 3 Pages

All of that money is distributed into the college in some way, but it is not parcelled out to the players that are responsible for it. This is truly an abomination in a lot of the athletes eyes because they have their likeness used throughout the sports world without compensation, the players are the whole reason the money is made, and these sports at this level are treated as a job. Whenever you flip on a television, and turn to a sports

Read More
1604 Words | 7 Pages

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (or NCAA) is the nonprofit governing body of college athletics. Overseeing more than 1,000 member institutions and some 430,000 student athletes, varying in competition from division I, II and III, these student athletes differ in a plethora of ways, but the one commonality they share, is that none of them are paid. The NCAA is not only the singular association overseeing college athletes, but is also the executive authority of rules, regulations and eligibility of each and every college athlete. While the NCAA cannot be classified as your “typical” corporation, it exudes many of the same fundamental exploitations to which corrupt and unethical corporations conduct business, but at the expense

Read More
1238 Words | 5 Pages

College Athletes Compensation How would you feel if you were to perform and work as hard as you could but have all of the money that results from your hard work go to someone else, and you get none of it? Division I college athletes not being compensated for their efforts is a major problem. Universities and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) profit around $6 billion annually off of college athletes; meanwhile these athletes do not see any of this money and may even go to bed hungry. These student athletes put their bodies and health on the line when they step out for their sports and often have to pay a lifetime of medical bills, and do not get any help with this. When trying to provide for themselves, students are

Read More
1541 Words | 7 Pages

Most NCAA sports do not make enough profit in order to pay their players any more than their scholarships, due to the fact that most sports do not draw large crowds and have much popularity. The focus on paying college athletes would mainly be on Division 1 football and men’s basketball players, the two sports that bring in the overwhelming amount of the NCAA’s athletic revenue. These two sports bring in billions of dollars due to large television and media contracts, and the amount of public support for these two sports. The gap between amount of profit made by the NCAA and the amount of compensation that football and basketball players receive is the largest, making it important that these players are paid for what they are worth to the NCAA and the universities that they

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

In 2011-2012 alone the NCAA made $871.6 million (Slobodzian). The money that is being raked in by the NCAA is made because of student-athlete’s untiring work. Surprisingly, the student-athletes don’t receive any of that money because they have to sign a contract that states that they can’t take any compensation while they play collegiate sports. It has been a heated debate for years and neither side is willing to budge on their stance. Student-athletes in college should be compensated because they make the school a plethora of money and playing a sport is like a full-time job.

Read More
1776 Words | 8 Pages

Lastly, from the 2015 NCAA Men’s College Basketball Tournament alone, the NCAA revenue exceeded $1 billion. These student athletes should be able to share some of this money being brought

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

Over the past years, college sports have been in demand across the United States. Whether it be, football, basketball , or baseball, since the early 2000’s, college sports have brought a payout for their Universities and increased the College’s reputation. For example, The University of Florida had the 3rd highest income based off of football games totaled at $106,030,895( Orland Sentientnel). With this amount of money being made, no athletes are paid back for their work. The NCAA states, “ You are not eligible for participation in a sport if you have ever: Taken pay, or the promise of pay, for competing in that sport” ( NCAA regulation 1).

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

College athletes are not receiving a physical paycheck; instead they are receiving a scholarship that is worth much

Read More
2039 Words | 9 Pages

Paying college athletes has been a trending topic around the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Universities should not allow players to receive compensation for their performances. When money is involved many problems can arise. There are many different kinds of sports within a university; thus causing, many questions to develop. For example, will all sport athletes get paid and will some athletes get paid more than other?

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Paying Student Athletes

Related Topics

Open Document