Based on the leadership styles questionnaire, my primary leadership style is authoritarian. However, I was only a two point away from being labeled a democratic leader, which I think I am more of. I do and do not agree with this questionnaire. I can be an authoritarian leader because I believe it can be better to dictate policies and procedures along with setting goals that must be achieved so that everything and everyone is organized. However, I do not and would not want to control the assigned activities. Additionally, I would like is more if members of the group take a more participative role in the decision making even if there are set rules. I say this because I feel like the rules and goals set can definitely be changed with reason, I look at them more as a start or a draft to the bigger picture. Overall, I do agree since I would like to lead by telling a group what needs to be done and how it should be done, but I would like to also involve members in the decision making if something does not sound right or work well. For example, during my sophomore year I was …show more content…
They have the ability to control their emotions while being able to communicate with others in different situations, while also being able to observe emotional responses they are getting to then further communicate with others and work effectively. Emotional intelligence is also important because it means leaders are aware of their emotions thus allowing them to focus on their strengths while also being aware of their weakness thus being able to control and work on them. Furthermore, it is very important to be able to control emotions during stressful times, many tend to explode or take it out on others, however, a leader with emotional intelligence is able to control their emotions during these times thus being able to lead a team