ipl-logo

Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay

2130 Words9 Pages

College is the place and time in a young adult’s life where skills are learned and perfected for one’s future career. During this time students are exposed to real world situations, such as working hard to make a name for themselves. Student athletes are no different; they work hard to become the best. “College athletics are rooted in the classical ideal of Mens sana in corpore sano—a sound mind in a sound body” (Branch para.8) College athletes help bring media attention and student enrollment into many universities. With the popularity of college sports on the rise the athletes are getting more and more attention as well as the universities the athletes are representing. The focus on college sports as sparked a debate of whether …show more content…

Both sides of the argument have strong compelling arguments. As a college student and former athlete I feel, college athletes should not get any monetary compensation other than education, and living. I shall concern myself with the economic side of paying athletes, moreover I will argue the privilege of playing college sports as well as how paying college athletes will ruin what college sports are. With the help of several resources I will be able to clearly define both sides of the argument and prove why my point of view makes the most sense. The sources I will use will give authority to my argument as well as prevent me from creating logical fallacies. To help me and my readers better understand the debate on whether or not college athletes should get paid I will use Taylor Branch’s The Shame of College Sports, and Paul Barrett’s Bad Sports articles. Both of these articles give plenty of background information on college athletics. Branch’s article goes in extent detail when explaining the rules and regulations of the NCAA. Also in Branch’s article he proves and disproves theories from both sides of the argument. Branch’s historical context, theories, and statistics

Show More
Related
1721 Words | 7 Pages

Sports reporter, Kate Murphy, succinctly summarizes an overwhelming standpoint that many people seem to cite in her article "Privilege, not a job: College athletes shouldn 't be paid. " First, she stipulates herself that student-athletes technically fit the criteria of hardworking employees. She also acknowledges that it is nearly impossible for athletes to balance a job while adhering to their strict schedules. However, because student-athletes are "living the dream" and are supposed to drink up the passion and sacrifices of their game, seeking compensation is grotesque and un-sportsman like. This argument rides on the coattails of "purity."

Read More
2434 Words | 10 Pages

The author suggests that because not all college athletes are on scholarship, many of them still have to be employed to be able to pay for their college. Therefore, the author argues that while playing a collegiate sport, a full time job in itself, many athletes have to work another job on top of it. The article suggests that with compensation, this problem, along with many other problems including ending corruption and increasing motivation to play, can be

Read More
1014 Words | 5 Pages

Annotative bibliography: Should college athletes be paid? Due to National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules and regulations no college athlete is allowed to receive any compensation or endorsement while participating in college athletics. It is very problematic rules and many people and professional do not agree with these rules. Despite all the researches that suggested that NCAA the Universities makes multimillions dollars a year from college’s sport, the NCAA still insisting on applying the rule that no college athletes should be compensated about their effort and time.

Read More
625 Words | 3 Pages

Should College Athletes Be Paid? In this informational article “College Athletes Getting Paid? Here Are Some Pros and Cons” by Malcolm Lemmons, athlete, author, and entrepreneur, informs the reader on the NCAA and how they do not pay their players. That has been a very controversial topic over the years on if they should get paid.

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

In 2011-2012 alone the NCAA made $871.6 million (Slobodzian). The money that is being raked in by the NCAA is made because of student-athlete’s untiring work. Surprisingly, the student-athletes don’t receive any of that money because they have to sign a contract that states that they can’t take any compensation while they play collegiate sports. It has been a heated debate for years and neither side is willing to budge on their stance. Student-athletes in college should be compensated because they make the school a plethora of money and playing a sport is like a full-time job.

Read More
442 Words | 2 Pages

College athletes do not receive monetary compensation, pinpointing the lack of acknowledgements and uphill battle of practices, workouts, and showcasing their talents in seasonal and regular games. Accompanying all this, the predominate reasons for the NCAA compensation towards athletes is to maintain amateur status, to help student athletes to complete their college career, moreover to comprise the integrity of an athlete hard work on and off the field. Take a second to reflect, on what these college athletes have accomplished over the years for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), the

Read More
914 Words | 4 Pages

College sports is a huge industry and makes hundreds of millions of dollars a year. The revenue is insane and the people bringing in all the money aren't even being payed. The athletes performing is what is bringing in all of the money, some say that the scholarship that most of the best players in the country have is good compensation but others think not. I believe college athletes should be paid because of all the time and effort the athletes put in. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) makes about 900 million dollars just from the NCAA tournament more formally known as “March Madness”.

Read More
1233 Words | 5 Pages

People have debated the century long question about if college athletes should be paid, and in recent years the question has become more and more prominent. The short answer is no, and the evidence that supports that argument is plentiful. Although there are many people who do support the counterargument that college athletes should be paid due to their such tight schedules. There is an argument for both sides of the issue regarding college athletics compensation, but only one side stands higher than the other. That side supports that college athletes should not be getting paid while they attend college just because they play their sport on the side.

Read More
1180 Words | 5 Pages

Paying College Athletes College athletes work year round preparing to participate in contests that entertain viewers and earn the NCAA and many universities money. Some believe that universities make financial gains at the expense of the athletes; however, many of these athletes at large universities playing the more popular sports like football and basketball are on full scholarship and receive countless free benefits. This has led to the question: Should college athletes be paid? For years, there have been many differing ideas and opinions on this controversial subject. The nature of the problem is that universities bring in millions of dollars in revenue related to athletics, yet the athletes who put in countless hours practicing their

Read More
1320 Words | 6 Pages

Another author supports, “Student-athletes are amateurs who choose to participate in intercollegiate athletics as part of their educational experience, thus maintaining a distinction between student-athletes who participate in the collegiate model and professional athletes who might be students as well” (Karaim). College sports is just like high school and youth sports, just at a higher level. No high school or youth athletes are getting paid, they are focusing on school work and sports is an extra activity that the students choose to do in their free time. It is the same thing in college, students are pursuing a degree and are by choice participating in their sports. The sports are not their

Read More
1526 Words | 7 Pages

There has been a growing argument in recent years, of whether or not college athletes should receive payment from their schools. Though people from both sides of the argument have valid points to make, it is obvious that not paying college athletes is more beneficial to the athletes as well as the universities. The benefits that college athletes currently receive are better than the alternative of treating sports as a job in order to receive a salary. The positive side of receiving an athletic scholarship over a yearly salary is much greater than the other way around.

Read More
1708 Words | 7 Pages

The question whether to pay college athletes has been a debatable topic over the past few years. College athletes devote many hours to not only their sport but to their academics. Just imagine yourself being a college athlete, taking your game to the next level. Devoting your hard work and dedication to the sport you love. The question that arises from many people is: Why aren't these college athletes getting paid for doing the same thing that professional athletes do?

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

A topic that is debatable ubiquitously across the country is whether college athletes should be paid or not. Is it fair that college athletes must win championships, be held accountable for their academics, attend practice regularly, and continue to maintain a set grade point average without being paid? Yes, being an athlete and a student is a difficult task. Athletes are expected to hold a high reputation and for themselves and the college. In any case, college athletes should be given benefits but not salaries.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

There is so much time focused on their sports it’s hard for college athletes to be strong students as well. I would like to explore both sides of this argument, those who believe college athletes should be paid, as well as those who believe these athletes shouldn’t be paid. At the moment I am unsure of what side I will take, but I believe this is a highly debated topic with strong opinions for both sides. This question is problematic because it would change college athletics completely.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.

Read More

More about Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay

Related Topics

Open Document