Should college athletes be able to get paid to play
History of athletes NCAA treatment
Is it true that top-recruited highly talented NCAA student-athletes go to bed hungry on some nights? Not surprisingly; yes. Even the most popular, top-recruited athletes lay to rest on an empty stomach after putting their bodies on the line every day for their schools. Do they deserve more than what they're getting? Athletes that bring in revenue for their school based on their talents should rightfully receive a cut of the money made at the end of each semester along with some type of commission from their university. Many disagree with the previous statement due to the fact that most of the top athletes already have free tuition; however, this does not account for the majority of athletes who
…show more content…
In an ESPN article, Rovell said that if college athletes were to be classified as employees, that the IRS might be able to make the argument that scholarships are really payment for services and is now considering to be taxable income. College professors have made the argument that if college athletes receive wages instead of scholarships that the athletes would be worse off because they are waiving their right to a tax-exempt education.
After examining the tax code none of these fallacies abide by it. Tax laws state that in order for the IRS to compute one’s taxable liability they must first elaborate on one’s gross income. Section 117 of the IRC excludes qualified scholarships as gross income. Qualified scholarships are anything that is meant to further the educating and training of the individual who is the recipient. History suggest that subsequent work for a university in exchange for free education are qualified scholarships, in other words saying that scholarships are more similar to contracts than a gift.
Research