ipl-logo

The Continual Debate Of Origin Creation Vs. The Big Bang

954 Words4 Pages

Why are people so quick to deny the idea that the origin of the world came from a divine creator? Society reverts quickly to the idea that the world was created by complete happenchance. The continual debate of the origin creation vs the Big Bang (Evolution) contradicts the teachings that the world has a creator; therefore, not formed from essentially a “Big Bang”. The debate has now come to a power struggle between Christians and “Reasoners” or scientists. Neither side wants to budge or give in to avoid losing power or the “edge” in the debate. Citizens either have two views of the origin of the universe. The first being that a divine creator (God) created all of the universe and everything in it. The second being the belief that the world …show more content…

They are biased to the idea of a creator, and they have the right to be. The evidence is on their side. The people that back up the second idea are mostly atheists or do not want anything to do with Christianity. These people believe that the universe was created by chance and science (Jackson 1). The Big Bang says that all of the matter in the universe was packed into a tiny space no larger than a dot on a page. Where did all of the matter come from? What caused it to stay in one dot? Where did the gravity come from to hold it together? These questions have been avoided by Evolutionists time and time again. The answer is simple, there was not any of the matter. You simply do not come up with something from nothing. This is highly impossible (“Big Bang and The Bible” 1). In an environment without any friction one would have this spinning dot going so fast that it would later have to explode.The matter and planets would all have to spin in the same direction as the dot that it exploded from. This is the conservation of angular momentum. How do you explain some planets spinning and rotating in different directions? Even those planets have moons that spin and rotate in the …show more content…

The random undirected descent of the creation of the world is the the main backup of the debate (“What The Bible Says 1). Some evolutionists say that the creationist view is not worth the time to study and test. They say it is “not worthy” enough (2). The Big Bang teaches that the universe was randomly made 80-100 Billion years ago. It also says that in 80-100 Billion years the Earth and Solar System will be compressed once again. By this we would be compressed together again into a tiny dot like once before (The Big Bang and The Bible 2). Overall the theory teaches nothing is planned. Everything is random and wholly materialistic. The whole belief is that it is all by science and reasoning (Wieland

Show More
Related
1118 Words | 5 Pages

Causing an anti-evolution movement to sweep across the nation as many religious groups to speak out against the teaching of evolution being re added. In the 1960’s they came up with a theory and introduced it nationally as “creation science”. “The theory of creation science claimed that the universe and life in it came about suddenly and from nothing”(Childs). Those that tended to agree with this theory consisted of religious citizens who believed the theory of darwin contained insufficient information. They argued that earth and life were recent creations, humans and apes come from different ancestors, and that earth's geology was initiated by sudden, violent events .(Hanson)The result of having different mindsets evidently show the barrier that these teachings have on the United States.

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

Too much matter in space would make everything too heavy, and the universe would collapse. On the other hand, not enough matter in the universe would make everything too light, and it would “fly apart”. (Lisle, 2010) An explosion like the Big Bang would not have created the perfect balance we have today, in fact, it would have destroyed it. The Scriptural problems with this hypothesis should be self -evident.

Read More
214 Words | 1 Pages

The ten points that Michael Shermer presents and wants people to know when encountering a claim are the sources’ reliability of the claim, sources making similar claims, sources’ validity, how the claim works with how the world works, counterarguments, the evidence’s importance, the logic behind the claim, solid evidence, claim having logic and evidence to explain the old phenomenons, and last, but not least, personal beliefs influencing the claim. Creation science breaks at least three of these points. One of the points that creation science breaks is that personal beliefs are driving the claim. Religion contributes tremendously to creation science. Because there is religion is involved with creationism, there is bias to it, and people who

Read More
239 Words | 1 Pages

Where do atheism and Christianity agree and disagree on views of the origin of the universe? Natural Selection - There is sufficient evidence in nature that living organism can adapt and change within their species according to their environmental demands. The Beginning Point of the Universe - Christians can agree upon is that the universe had a finite, singular, beginning point in which some call it the Big Bang.

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

There have been endless debates concerning the Story of Creation. Genesis 1 provides us with the story that God created the universe in six days, and on the seventh day he rested, which the Catholic Church believed for many years. However, there are so many scientific theories, like the Big Bang Theory and the theory of organic evolution, that prove the Earth was created through scientific means. The Big Bang Theory states that 13.77 billion years ago, the universe was a tiny particle that suddenly expanded by an explosion and formed the world we know today.

Read More
1332 Words | 6 Pages

Subsequently, amid this period, the universe was adequately misty. Once the universe had arrived at 300,000 years of age, particles could structure, and electrons were presently bound to a core. When this happened, photons could move about uninhibitedly. This "first light" is the CMB, and its presence is exceptionally solid evidence that the Big Bang

Read More
201 Words | 1 Pages

Cosmogony is an account of how the world came into being. Christians believe that God created the universe in his divine wisdom. The world was created within six literal days and that on the seventh day God rested from his creation work and called it Sabbath. Creation was not spontaneous or arbitrary but purposeful. Everything that God created was good and morally upright.

Read More
86 Words | 1 Pages

Instant Creationists believe that the duration of an act of creation to be much shorter than six literal human days. The main argument behind is that the days of creation could not be related to human time since God is timeless. Some instant creationists believe that the act of creation had happened parallel in an instant and there is no actual perceivable time gaps between the events while others consider the process to be completed sequentially in less than literal six human days as in genesis.

Read More
1007 Words | 5 Pages

Supporting a Creationist Worldview with Science Scientific evidence is consistent with the belief that the physical universe was designed by God. After researching this topic, I was interested to find just how much supportive evidence there is for creation and its beliefs. There is a misconception that the Bible is old, dated, and couldn’t have enough solid evidence to support the idea that a God of ancient times could have spoken the world as we know it into existence. One would think that modern science and research would be able to yield a much more sensible, concrete formula for the origin of life, and certainly one that makes more sense than an invisible God in heaven forming it from nothing. This is however, as I mentioned previously, a misconception

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

It is natural for us as individual to promote creationist. It would be no need for criticism if we knew the facts to be valid. Evolutionary is indeed the cornerstone of all modern biology. Evolutionary on the other hand is as if creationist can be several

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

And God gave them his blessing and said to them,” - Genesis 1:27-28. Nevertheless, there are also these people who don’t believe that man existed because of God’s creation, what they think is that, man started from animals (specifically primates) then eventually evolved through time. Because of these beliefs, the dispute began and until now, still exists. Creationism vs. Evolution – The Beginning of the Battle Strictly speaking, creationism is based on a literal reading of the Bible’s Book of Genesis, which states the creation of everything including human being in a span of six days.

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

On the other hand, Creationist believe that a higher power above everything created the world and everything in it within some days. Authors, Stephen Jay Gould and David P Barash, who wrote these new york times articles; Evolution as fact and theory and God, Darwin and My College Biology Class respectively illustrated on the challenges and conflicts evolution and fundamentalist religion. The

Read More
1191 Words | 5 Pages

There are many views on creation and theologians have even gotten into heated debates over this topic. With so many views out there, it is hard, almost impossible to pick a view to firmly believe in a world with so many debates over this one topic. It is very strange that this topic is so heated and littered in controversy when salvation does not depend on it. Although, some people act like it is a dogmatic belief in Christianity, that is not the case.

Read More
1484 Words | 6 Pages

The Creation and Evolution Debate The Creation and evolution debate has drawn tremendous amounts of attention since Charles Darwin created the theory of evolution in 1844. The argument has risen up major conflicts throughout the years and there are many rigid followers on each side. The reason for this is that this debate challenges the philosophical opinions of each person. In this essay evidence will be presented from both sides, forming the conclusion that evolution is flawed and cannot be scientifically correct.

Read More
1249 Words | 5 Pages

Creationists believe the earth was created by an intelligent being, God, over 6,000 years ago. Science found its origin in Europe by men who believed in the universe being designed in an orderly fashion and created by God. Scientists such as Galileo, Newton, Bacon and Kepler believed in a recently created earth. For science now to deny the creationist's point of view is to deny scientific history. Since no one witnessed the creation (except God), scientists' study of the formation of the universe are based on assumptions and theories.

Read More

More about The Continual Debate Of Origin Creation Vs. The Big Bang

Open Document