NASA is a rich powerful association that focuses on space and any movements that happen outside the world. It is true that NASA contributes to some extent on how far technology has gone. Contributions being the signal smartphones receive from space satellites. However, the economy is not totally healthy unless "the economy were growing at a healthy rate, say 4 percent per year" (Roff 4). This percentage is near far what the U.S. economy is increasing yearly. Therefore, the government should reduce funds for NASA for the better of our country. The U.S government is to consider reducing NASA funds to spare money to pay off the countries’ debt, give way to private companies, and help reduce country related problems
The United States right now
…show more content…
A renowned private company that has rippled many responses by the space community has been Space created by Elon Musk, the owner of Tesla. Private companies have arrived to revolutionize the space race and can facilitate NASA's life as working together comes to be a great exhibition to travel to space without having to ask the government for money, in return that can benefit the common people. With that being said, NASA is not in need of funds because collars are always a great way to progress, NASA… has come to rely on Space and other companies for transport to the space station as its funding has tightened”(Musanaga 5). NASA relying in private companies can result in positive effect as no money can be spared or wasted and private companies can help gain funds outside of the government. Reducing NASA funds by 3-4 billion dollars a year can help impact private collaborations as working together can become a new memo to …show more content…
and instead is focusing on what happens if the world collapses and humanity is forced to leave. Humanity is not going anywhere any time soon and the government should focus on in country problems. The truth is that NASA wastes money just like a v8 truck wastes gas, quickly and rapidly, as a “278 Million package which blasted off the Vandenberg air force base on Tuesday and promptly crashed into the Pacific”(De Groot 3). This kinds of failures end up affecting the average worker who makes around 30k a year because once the money is gone, there is no going back. In the U.S poverty is problem as “769 million people lived on less than $1.90 a day in 2013; they are the world’s poorest. Of these, 3.2 million live in the United States” (Deaton 4). Furthermore, 3.2 million people living in poor conditions is a disgrace to a country like the United States because NASA is burning money like fuel in inefficient launches that will land in the pacific for no reason. It only takes a few millions to take out someone out of poverty, and by reducing NASA funds, some of the money can go to charity companies that will help the