The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

528 Words3 Pages

Take a look in the mirror. Does a rabbit look like you or me? Does a mouse look like you and me? How about a dog or cat; do they look like us? No, they do not. Animal Experimentation is not required in moving forward in human medical science in modern society. Because humans respond so differently than other animals, using other animals to test on is unreliable at best, and fatally dangerous at worst, for humans. Which brings up the question, should animals be used for medical/cosmetic reasons/testing? With the data in this paper I hope to show why it should be done for and finished. First, let me ask the question. Do the animals have the same DNA make up as humans, for what the research is testing. And the answer is no, although dogs (84%), mice (90%), and monkeys (approximately 93%) share a large amount of DNA. But never the less, it is not the same make up. And secondly, …show more content…

Acute Toxicity Tests, in which the animal is forced into receiving extremely high doses of perfume like products via force-feeding, forced inhalation, and/or absorption through the skin. The animals in these test may succumb to awful symptoms such as severe abdominal pain, diarrhea, convulsions, seizures, paralysis, and bleeding from the nose, mouth, and genitals before they ultimately die or are “put down”. You may be thinking, are there any laws or acts to protect these little cuties? And yes, The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) is the only U.S. federal law that covers animals in research. The law sets minimal standards for housing, feeding, handling, veterinary care, and for some species like chimps, their psychological well-being. While it is impossible to determine the precise number of animals in U.S. laboratories, since government statistics do not currently include the species named above, conservative estimates indicate that U.S. labs use over 25 million animals