ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Research

809 Words4 Pages

Considering the external validity in terms of using rats and mice are harder to generalize to humans than say chimps I would say that it does make a difference. Ask most people and I think you would find that experimenting on rats as opposed to chimps is a long leap ethically. Although both are mammals I believe that the closer the animal’s mind comes to the human mind the more ethical concerns are raised, even though the closer correlation would make them more generalizable. I would have to say that I did not have any strong opinions on the ethical nature of animal research, so other than informative the statistic did not impact me one way or the other.

Since wearing the hide of animals is no longer a part of survival I believe it is an …show more content…

Mice and rats which make up 80-90% of animal research are not even protected under the same rights as cats and dogs, with cats and dogs having far more rights. Though their viewpoint is that they kill the animals “humanely” and argue that the experiments done on lesser animals is “inhumane.” However, there aren’t many activist protesting or going after hunters. Shooting a buck without killing it and then not being able to track it leading to a slow and painful death could be seen as humane but hunting serves to control animal population. Which also happens to be why these animal right organizations kill so many cats and dogs. What were to happen if millions of rats were released into the wild? Does a cat playing with a mouse for hours, playing with it while breaking its bones before it finally kills the mouse not inhumane? Or the mouse’s life is only of importance if it is being harmed by …show more content…

This sentiment also applies to vandalism, vandalism for a cause is still a crime and should be treated accordingly. Now as far as threatening human life to further a crusade towards making an animals quality of life better is where I have a strong moral objection. Humane goes for all living things, they cannot claim to be an activist for humane practices while harming another living thing, the contradiction takes away all support behind their cause. As far as the outline for the rights of animals and researchers I would have to say it is pretty simple for me. Rights are in most cases given or entitled to something through legislation. By following the current and proper guidelines, laws, researchers have a right to practice their research within those parameters. Humans do not have the right to harm other humans for the reasons these activists are killing or hurting researchers. The thought of moral opinion being in conflict with official legislation is not a new concept. I would suggest that they follow in the footsteps of those that have succeeded in the past such as civil rights and LGBT

Show More
Related
640 Words | 3 Pages

However, I feel they are going too far and much too extreme in order to stop farmers and researches from obtaining animals from the wild. Certain groups capture animals whether its farmers, rescuers or hunters. Because of the various groups obtaining animals, there are certain requirements and animal regulations for each group. Farmers usually obtain animals to provide food for the nation, rescuers obtain animals as a means of rescuing them from the cold environment or even from being pets in violent households and lastly, game hunters capture animals for their own personal means. Out of these three categories of people, I feel that the one that animal rights groups should target are the hunters because their hunting of animals does not help human or

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

Studies show that with all of the animal experimentation that has been done, most of them were inhumane, unreliable and had violated the Animal Welfare Act of 1966. This act ensures that animal care for research is a main priority. It is also required to have appropriate veterinary care, housing, feeding, handling, sanitation, ventilation, and sheltering. For some, animal experimentation is “supposed” to help human beings use certain products for their own benefit. What people do not realize is that these animals have rights and that their rights are being more than violated.

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

Animals should have the right to be free from unnecessary suffering and experimentation because they are innocent creatures. An argument for opposing the Animal Bill of Rights is that research will be slowed or stopped completely, resulting in the death of humans that could have been saved. The Animal Bill of Rights is not meant to stop or prevent experimentation on animals; it is meant to limit the extraneous suffering and torment animals go through in the name of development. Animals are innocent- it cannot defend itself against malevolent human intentions. The Animal Bill of Rights is meant to prevent the exploitation of animals and refute the justification that experimentation makes animal cruelty moral.

Read More
1640 Words | 7 Pages

As a society there should be a continuation of proceeding to develop new laws. Animals have rights that are not being protected or considered when they are not given the chance to live without suffering or harm. Additionally animal rights are violated when they are used as products for experimentation. Animal experimentations

Read More
1585 Words | 7 Pages

Yet, animal’s rights are violated when they are used in research because they are not given a choice (“Save the Animals”)”. 3. Scientists still continue animal experimentation because they believe animals have no dignity and should simply be seen as objects in order to improve the life cycle. III. Inside laboratories, animals suffer too much and are continued to be treated inhumane.

Read More
1188 Words | 5 Pages

Americans are choosing to mute their opinions on this heated topic “Although 25% of Americans say they believe animals deserve the "exact same rights" as people to be free from harm and exploitation, many of these same people oppose proposals to limit the harm and exploitation of animals.” (Moore, 2003) It is inhumane to physically and mentally hurt an animal; they are receptive to the same amount of pain and discomfort as humans. Therefore why are they a fair component for research and testing? Humans feel that since we are the rulers of creation, that all power is in our hands to diminish animal’s lives.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

We have a voice while they don’t so we should be the ones standing up for them and punish those heartless owners. There are many types of animal abuse but the most common ones are scientific research, abandonment, and mistreatment. Scientific research is a need in life because things that have chemicals and are used for humans must be tested before actually using it, but it doesn’t have to be on animals and companies should make their products from natural organic ingredients. Animal testing is a huge problem right now and it should be stop, because there are innocent animals that are treated badly and harmed for the safety of a human.

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

In the past few decades, humans have become more and more self-centered rather than becoming more aware of the dangers they are putting animals through. Animal right activists have been trying to put a stop to harmful animal experiments which in the end are only benefiting humans. The Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) is a well known group that for the last 36 years has been trying to establish an Animal Bill of Rights in order to protect animals’ legally. The presented Bill of Rights would protect animals from life-threatening experiments as well as provide safety to their physical and psychological necessities in order to live a healthy life. Animals should most definitely not be given a Bill of Rights in order to secure them from inhumane

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

Activists fight back on Animal Experimentation Animal experimentation is the use of an animal in scientific research. Many people don’t know that are very important aspects of animal experimentation that are uncalled for and unethical. The three main parts in animal experimentation that are unethical are all of the unsuccessful trials, the harm it does to animals, and the difference between animals and humans that make it near to impossible to replicate humans in an animal. All around animal experimentation is an unlawful, unsuccessful, and unhealthy way to test items. With all of the items you see in market that say, “Tested on animals” you would think that there was so much success with each trial.

Read More
1370 Words | 6 Pages

Every day, animals must persevere with the inhumane activity of people whether it be in laboratories or even in households. If one were to support the animal rights movement, that person is pushing for these creatures to not have to undergo the torture of servicing humans, more specifically, medical research. Animals should have freedom from the despotism of people, incarceration from the wild, and being the experiment. They should have equality with humans in the sense that these creatures are unable to confront this conflict. It is ludicrous to believe that people consider tormenting and killing such innocent souls is psychologically adequate.

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

Animal rights issues have taken a more prominent place in the national media. Through the course of evolution both the animal and the human species have evolved. As our body and mind have evolved, we have separated from each other. Scientist are faced with the reputation as evil maniacal men that are torturing, and making animals suffer. They are seen injecting diseases and drugs into animals that in the end will eventually kill the animal.

Read More
1780 Words | 8 Pages

Although some humans may take animal rights seriously, there is still great controversy between whether or not animals should even be given them. This topic is controversial because some humans recognize that animals are conscious and have morals, while others just see animals as entertainment and food. People do not have to be crazy animal lovers to recognize that certain things that are done to animals are simply wrong. Animals should be given rights because it has been proven that that they have a conscious, they cannot defend themselves as humans can, and people, whether we admit it or not, are animals too.

Read More
584 Words | 3 Pages

Should animals need a ‘’Bill of Rights’’? Animals are seen as nothing more than a childhood pet. Animals are beautiful creatures that should be protected and cherished. Through animal research and experimentations, humans are getting benefit and gains in inhumane ways; the poor animals are suffering through pain, even though they have moral statuses and rights. Animals are vulnerable, defenseless, and in man’s power.

Read More
1055 Words | 5 Pages

Animal rights is a topic that has been discussed for years. Activist are trying to prove that animals should have the same rights as humans even though many say not. There are multiple cases of animal abuse where the suspect hasn’t received a great enough punishment for what they have done to the creature. Where as if the victim was a human the person that committed the crime could have possibly received life. If animals don’t receive rights they could continue to be neglected, mistreated, and tested on.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

True animal rights proponents believe that humans do not have the right to use animals at all. Animal rights proponents wish to ban all use of animals by humans.” (Animal Welfare Council). There are organizations set up to push this belief such as PETA and ASPCA. Animal welfare activists have the opinion that

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Animal Research

Related Topics

Open Document