ipl-logo

Satire Essay On Animal Testing

1188 Words5 Pages

The ethics revolving around animal rights and animal testing are highly controversial. A large scale of people in the United States say that animals deserve some protection from misuse, while other Americans argue animals are worthy of the same rights as humans. However, a quarter of Americans object banning medical research, which results from animal testing. A clear majority of people if they were tied up or injected with substances into the bloodstream or inhalation and force-feeding would lean towards declining the studies. As for animals, we are their voice and give them no option but to be tested on and when finished it either results in death or sold to another laboratory. Is that humane? No, because there is no morally relevant difference …show more content…

Moore, a public lukewarm writer, released data regarding Americans views on animal rights and states “women are more likely than men to support animal rights, and Democrats more than Republicans, but there are few differences by age.” With that being specified it shows that differentiating between gender and political views it will clearly specify who is for and who is against. Stage of development (age) on the other hand shows a scarce amount of variety, which is attributable to their biological sex. Democrat or not, we are entitled to our rights just as animals should be. We have the authority and power to decide our beliefs. Americans are choosing to mute their opinions on this heated topic “Although 25% of Americans say they believe animals deserve the "exact same rights" as people to be free from harm and exploitation, many of these same people oppose proposals to limit the harm and exploitation of animals.” (Moore, 2003) It is inhumane to physically and mentally hurt an animal; they are receptive to the same amount of pain and discomfort as humans. Therefore why are they a fair component for research and testing? Humans feel that since we are the rulers of creation, that all power is in our hands to diminish animal’s lives. We the people are uttering “same rights” for animals may be an overstatement, but is

Show More
Related
880 Words | 4 Pages

Do rights only pertain to humans? Should animals have rights just like people have there own rights? These rights could be for anything from being illegal to captivate animals, to animals having the right to do what they please. Animals these days, especially farm animals are treated with such abuse. Animals should be treated with more respect, than they are now, they should have their own rights.

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

In the eyes of a utilitarian, humans and animals can be equals because

Read More
302 Words | 2 Pages

We are so lucky to have animals in the world. I mean, what better living creatures to use than rodents, rabbits, guinea pigs and hamsters for experimentation. Several popular beauty and cosmetic brands including Maybelline, Avon, Rimmel London, Covergirl and even Dove, test their products or ingredients on animals. Regardless of this having effects on their sales, companies perform this act for our safety and so that our mascaras don’t make our eyelashes fall out or our shampoos won’t make us bald. Most importantly, it’s done for proof when injured customers sue.

Read More
830 Words | 4 Pages

Animals have existed by human’s side for millions of years, however, recently, certain animals are being used to test human products. Products that are not significant compared to the pain animals such as guinea pigs, dogs, rats; and rabbit are forced to endure. Would testing that one lipstick formula or mascara be worth the agony of a living soul? For some, the answer would be yes, our own selfish needs outweigh their effects on others. Perhaps some people would even be the ones testing on these animals as long as they get paid.

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

Studies show that with all of the animal experimentation that has been done, most of them were inhumane, unreliable and had violated the Animal Welfare Act of 1966. This act ensures that animal care for research is a main priority. It is also required to have appropriate veterinary care, housing, feeding, handling, sanitation, ventilation, and sheltering. For some, animal experimentation is “supposed” to help human beings use certain products for their own benefit. What people do not realize is that these animals have rights and that their rights are being more than violated.

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

We as humans have created a world for ourselves through scientific advancements, but our morals and ethics seem to have been left in the dust. One of the most blatant examples of this is scientific testing of cosmetic products on innocent animals. To help set a scene of what happens, picture your dog or cat locked up in a small kennel only affording them space to curl up unmoving for their entire lives, only taken out to be poked and prodded with needles. Harmful chemicals are injected into their bodies so scientists can observe the reactions an animal might have to products dreamed up in their labs. Keep in mind these dangerous chemicals would cause too much harm to humans that are exposed to them.

Read More
1585 Words | 7 Pages

Yet, animal’s rights are violated when they are used in research because they are not given a choice (“Save the Animals”)”. 3. Scientists still continue animal experimentation because they believe animals have no dignity and should simply be seen as objects in order to improve the life cycle. III. Inside laboratories, animals suffer too much and are continued to be treated inhumane.

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

After researching many articles for hours ‘n’ hours all I found was fake information about how animals not being harassed, well in that I case I might as well start walking around rubbing makeup and what not on people. Anyways, animals, are like us humans, they too have DNA, so why are they tested on? Well according to professor. Charles experimenters experiment on animals because they are like us, well in that case don’t they too have feelings and pain receptors. Animal testing should be illegal, because it is done against their will – (they can’t actually speak, so technically you don’t have their consent), it is also quite inhumane to make animals slowly suffer and die for the goodness of our products.

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is when humans use animals to experiment a wide range of products from cosmetics to medication. Scientists use animals to test their new products for future human usage. Do Something is a profitless organization that motivates people to take action through national movements or projects that actually matters. Based on their website, over 100 millions animals are harmed and abused every year because of this cruelty. We strip these creatures’ freedom and lock them up in labs to allow the corporations to place a new lipstick in the market.

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

By now in` today's society we have all heard about animal testing and people who are against it such as PETA. But have we all actually thought about animal testing and what we buy every day the product could of been animal tested. Theses are the reasons animal testing is bad. As we know there are animal rights movements for example their is PETA and ASPCA which fight for animal rights.

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

Did you know that over 100 million animals are burned, paralyzed, drugged and abused every year? And only 3% of those animals survive this barbaric test we call animal testing. This is inhumane and cruel and this is why animal testing needs to be put to a stop and be illegal. It's bad/cruel and 95% of animal tested products fail in humans. It's a bad/cruel.

Read More
401 Words | 2 Pages

Animal testing is a form of animal abuse , but no one sees it that way. Animals are tested on daily, for “our sake”. So we hurt innocent animals when we can get willing humans to do the same thing they’re doing? Animal testing hurts animals, inside and out. All animals are sensitive creatures of god and don’t deserve the torture us humans put then through.

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

This sentiment also applies to vandalism, vandalism for a cause is still a crime and should be treated accordingly. Now as far as threatening human life to further a crusade towards making an animals quality of life better is where I have a strong moral objection. Humane goes for all living things, they cannot claim to be an activist for humane practices while harming another living thing, the contradiction takes away all support behind their cause. As far as the outline for the rights of animals and researchers I would have to say it is pretty simple for me. Rights are in most cases given or entitled to something through legislation.

Read More
586 Words | 3 Pages

There is much disagreement as to whether non-human animals have rights, and what is meant by animal rights. People have had a huge disagreement about that if animals not humans then should they or should they not have human rights. Growing up I have always been taught that if we have animals even if they are used for food we should treat them as if they are family. Some animals are used for food yes others are not used for food and in this paper I am going to discuss; do human beings have any obligations to animals in terms of their treatment. If it is wrong to treat animals cruelly, why is it not wrong to eat them?

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion, the overlapping ideas, regarding the equality of animals, and how humans should distinguish and defend the rights, or lack thereof, of animals, shows that no concrete, purely scientific answer exists. Instead, it is human opinion of a rather non-human focus that gnaws and drives animal’s rights controversies

Read More

More about Satire Essay On Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document