ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Bringing Back Extinction Species

743 Words3 Pages

“Should we bring extinct species back from the dead?” (David Shultz “Should we bring extinct species back from the dead,” 2018) I agree with this amazing idea to bring back extinct species. Many animals that went extinct were major “keystones” in their environments and affected many other species. By bringing back certain species we could slow down global warming. However, some argue that some species cannot adapt to the environment and would seriously affect the ecosystem but that’s not the case. Scientists are seriously thinking of bringing back extinct species for more than just fun and games. They are mainly thinking of bringing back species like the woolly mammoth and the passenger pigeon. The woolly mammoth lived in the arctic …show more content…

This could repopulate the area, encouraging the revival of ancient grasslands, which could slow the rate of melting permafrost and, therefore, reduce carbon emissions” (Sencer “Should we Bring Back Extinct species,” 2018) By doing this it would help slow down global warming. This would help the populations health and climate for future generations. By bringing back certain extinct species we could figure out how certain animals function and how they are built. We could also collect research and find out what kind of ecosystems they lived in. Which could lead scientists to find out why those animals went extinct. But some are against this amazing idea. They may argue that “De-extinct species would be alien and potentially invasive; their habitats and food sources have changed, so their roles in these changed ecosystems could be too.” (Breanna Draxler “5 Reasons to Bring Back Extinct Animals (And 5 Reasons Not To),” 2018) However that isn’t true, by bringing back certain extinct species it could benefit ecosystems. If new species are brought into the environment

Show More
Related
574 Words | 3 Pages

For say, if the famous Woolly Mammoths were brought back, "Their return to the north would bring back carbon-fixing grass and reduce greenhouse-gas-releasing tundra” (Point para 3). Woolly Mammoths would help make the world a better, healthier place for people to live in for humans. They would also make the

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

PROS: It is an awesome approach to acquire back equalization in the local ecosystem: Since wolves were killed in the Yellowstone National Park, the populaces of elks and deer climbed drastically throughout the years. The negative impact was felt when the region was overpopulated by crowds of elks which munched on the glades with a specific end goal to survive. Because of overgrazing, timberlands were exposed and vegetation was eaten up. With the recuperation program, there will adjust again since these wolves are predators of elks and bringing them back will diminish overpopulation.

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

I’m sure you all are curious as to what could possibly happen if many of these species were to become extinct. As I’ve discovered through the World Wildlife Fund, ecosystems supply both nature and people with food, health, and fresh water. A handful of species help serve as indicators, provide nutrients, and maintain a healthy ecosystem. Being an indicator means that some animals can provide information to us so that we may determine if there are problems with our current environment. For instance, polar bears and frogs have the ability to help control such problems like climate change, disease outbreak, and pollution.

Read More
432 Words | 2 Pages

In paragraph 1 of Why we should back extinct animals the author says,” Bringing back theses animals will change the environment.” This is true because our world is going through of a lot of changing and this is affecting us as humans. The author also claims in paragraph 2 that,” Bringing animals back will regend plants faster and stop them and other animals not to die out so fast.”

Read More
1098 Words | 5 Pages

Imagine a world where dinosaurs exist again… a Jurassic World. Should scientists bring back extinct species, like that of the dinosaurs? De-extinction is no longer a thing of science fiction; scientists have been trying to clone a Wooly Mammoth since the summer of 2011. Sadly scientists have said that the actual dinosaurs, like that of a T-Rex, have been dead for too long and therefore cannot be brought back. De-

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, by inserting a new species into a changed environment, it would not simply return to its former role. Although some argue that damaged or jeopardized ecosystems could be restored with the help of certain extinct species, it is nearly impossible to accurately predict the impacts of re-introducing a species. The chances for a negative outcome or a worsening of the ecosystem is highly probable, which should make scientists contemplate the potential ramifications before moving forward with plans to reintroduce extinct

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

De-Extinction Do you think that bringing back extinct species would be a good idea, well I don’t. In my opinion I do not think that scientists should bring back Woolly Mammoths for many reasons. Some of those reasons would be, if God made Woolly Mammoths extinct then he did it for a reason. One more reason is that we don’t have anywhere to put the Woolly Mammoths.

Read More
646 Words | 3 Pages

You’ll get a better habitat, more carbon sequestration, better landscapes and so

Read More
2055 Words | 9 Pages

Did you know that 100-1000 species of organisms go extinct on average every year? Many species of animals and even plants are going extinct due to habitat loss and poaching. The Endangered Species Act was created to help those species, but people often say it is misused, and others believe that it can actually help endangered species gain back population. While the Endangered Species Act has been misused in a lot of ways, it should be maintained because species are becoming endangered for many reasons, such as hunting and poaching, and it was created to help people understand the extinction issue and set rules to help protect the endangered species. Species are becoming endangered for many reasons, such as hunting and poaching.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

For example, science says that they can’t get enough DNA from dinosaurs to be able to bring them back because they only have fossils. Wooly mammoths may be easier because their bodies have been frozen in ice making it easier to take the DNA and put it in elephants. This process can bring animals back that can affect our ecosystems in a very big way. They can also alter the ways of life in those ecosystems. But it could also repopulate areas that low in numbers, a very good thing.

Read More
78 Words | 1 Pages

Having a child might affect my education in a big way. Because for starters I might have to drop out of school to be able to get a job to take care of it. Also I more than likely would not be able to go to college, because I might not have enough time to fit everything in. Because if I did not have a child I would have plenty of time to study and go to school.

Read More
145 Words | 1 Pages

Since you have been pregnant before, there is no reason to expect that you should not be able to conceive spontaneously after going off the Depo Provera. The fact that you terminated your pregnancies does not have any long term effects on your ability to conceive, and Depo, once it is out of your system, does not have any bearing on your fertility or ability to have a healthy child. Certainly there is no reason to delay trying to get pregnant if that is what you and your partner desire. However, sometimes it can take 6 months to even a year after stopping Depo for your ovulation to return consistently, so if you do not conceive easily right away, there is no reason to be concerned.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

In the article 5 Reasons to Bring Back Extinct Animals and 5 Reasons Not to, the author Breanna Draxler explains, “De-extinct species would be alien and potienally invasive; their habits and food sources have changed. So their in these changed ecosystems could be too” (2013). This means that if extinct species comes back, it would have new food sources and habits to adapt to. In the article De-Extinction Probably Not Worth It by Sarah Zielinski it states, “Then they would have to successfully re-introduce the species to the planet, taking care to find a place where the new-again species wouldn’t harm other animals and where the animal would be safe from whatever drove them extinct in the first place” (2017). This explains that if a species were to come back to the world scientists would have to re-introduce them to their habitats, their food sources, and other animals around them.

Read More
1675 Words | 7 Pages

Not only serious, but cruel and unnecessary. Every day, the number of animal casualties continue to escalate while the remaining population dwindles down to extinction. It's easy to dismiss this since we don't directly rely on some of these organisms. However, all aspects of the environment are connected in one way or another. An extinction of one species could threaten many other populations.

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

A lot of people think that zoos are good because they help repopulate, but no one thought that the only reason why we need to repopulate some species, was because of poaching and hunting. If people never had poaching and hunting, most animals are capable out there in the wild. On the other hand, Zoos have research programs that help expand our knowledge about animals, especially the endangered species. The information gained by these programs can help protect and treat the species in the wild, as well as determine what effects if any climate change may have on the regions needed for the species to flourish. Many zoos also have breeding programs for all kinds of species, endangered or not, and learn even more about the species during the breeding, and rearing process.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Bringing Back Extinction Species

Related Topics

Open Document