ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of CRISPR

1553 Words7 Pages

CRISPR is an amazing technology that has opened new doors to new areas of research that were once thought to impossible. This technology is huge for areas of research including human health, agriculture and many more. There are several implications that need to be considered before this technology is available to everyone. This technology is very new and we don’t know the long-term effects of these gene alterations and there are several concerns associated with it. After watching various TED talks and reading through successful tributes about CRISPR, I conclude that it is a resource that will improve the lives of many as well and expand the knowledge of researchers and scientists. This technology is so powerful and has the potential of curing and deleting disease all together. With every new technology, especially concerning human experimentation, …show more content…

It’s difficult to know if this is an ethical practice because the person whose DNA is currently being altered can give informed consent, but future generations cannot. This is what makes editing in the germline controversial. This is also why scientists suggests that if any DNA alterations are to be made, the germline should be off limits. CRISPR has the capability of causing mutation and unwanted side effects that can occur in the germline DNA alterations. These mutations and side effects can be inherited by future generations. Another issue with this is that we lack research on what unpredictable changes could occur in the test subject’s (human’s) DNA. The majority of CRISPR’s ethical problems are largely due to the uncertainty that researchers and scientists have on all areas of CRISPR. As mentioned, CRISPR is relatively new and it’ll take a while before we can be 100% confident to employ this technology without worrying about uncertainties. And this will only come from continued research in new

Show More
Related

Why Did Most Americans Oppose US Involvement In World War I

328 Words | 2 Pages

1. Why did most Americans oppose U.S. involvement in World War I in 1914? a. Many Americans wanted to reap the economic benefits of remaining neutral, as United Sates exports and profits skyrocketed. Entering the war would prove highly expensive and could send the nation into debt. Moreover, after hearing of the terrible human costs of the war, which the population considered a European fight, most Americans were unwilling to take part in it.

Read More

Archetypes In Brave New World

959 Words | 4 Pages

As an article from Popular Science says, CRISPR is the method used “to remove genes from an early stage embryo” (Chodosh). Although there is still not a one hundred percent guarantee that the DNA or gene can be removed from all the cells, it is still a successful and promising technique. At first glance it might seem inhumane to take or manipulate genes, the article says that “…the most useful genes to edit would be those for serious genetic diseases” (Chodosh). In other words, this could save thousands of babies from being sick or disabled for the rest of their lives. However, having the ability to manipulate genes also lends the opportunity of changing DNA to create designer babies.

Read More

CRISPR And Its Impact On Society

1287 Words | 6 Pages

The other ethical controversy of CRISPR is designer babies. The technology could be used in reproductive cells. Thus, parents would be able to alter their gametes in order to create a child with traits they want their child to have. For example, parents with brown eyes who viewed blue eyes as better for their child the technology makes this possible by editing the DNA in chromosome 19. The concern of this is that humankind will lose variety.

Read More

Genetic Modification In Brave New World

1013 Words | 5 Pages

("New Developments in Human Gene Editing Face an Ethical and Regulatory Quagmire in the

Read More

Ethics Of Gene Editing Technology In Brave New World

2373 Words | 10 Pages

The first step to making this safer should be germline editing in a dish to understand how to reduce risks such as targeting the wrong gene, off-target impacts (which create new problems), and mosaicism (when all copies of the gene were not changed) (Bergman). Given how much is unknown about germline gene editing, it was a shock to the world when a news leak in 2018 revealed Dr. Jiankui He, from the Southern University of Science and Technology, used gene editing to disable CCR5 (a gene involved with the HIV infection) in early embryos. The embryos were then implanted, and twin girls were born. Dr. He’s experiment was criticized for the lack of transparency (National Academies). While most scientists do not support the experiment done by Dr. He, many do support

Read More

Summary: The Ethics Of Designer Babies

270 Words | 2 Pages

Also the technology isn’t 100% safe yet as it’s only in the experimental stage still. Therefore I don’t think we should be allowed to genetically modify our children because there’s a greater possibility of accidentally “killing” the offspring than having them as the parents mix of their own

Read More

Persuasive Essay On Designer Babies

915 Words | 4 Pages

This technique would help those children and their future generations live a healthy life. This is a huge plus for the science world, but is one of few remarkable things. As they progress, new techniques are used to get rid of diseases, one being the “Crispr-Cas9” used to snip genes very accurately. “Thanks to Crispr-Cas9, it seems likely that gene therapies – eliminating mutant genes that cause some severe, mostly very rare diseases – might finally bear fruit, if they can be shown to be safe for human use” (Ball). These techniques are tested and made sure they are safe to perform.

Read More

Human Genetic Modification

1245 Words | 5 Pages

Altering one's DNA may be seen as unnatural. Perhaps they argue that natural selection is the only way. However, the natural selection argument has flaws. In fact, Charles Darwin himself noticed severe imperfections in human nature and noted that its methods are, in fact, quite ineffectual in many ways. Moreover, curing genetic disorders and diseases, like Down Syndrome, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s, through means of waiting for natural selection would not be as effective as using genetic modification because natural selection follows no plan or design for evolution, so there is no guarantee that anything will ever be cured, and natural selection is a slow, painful, and imprecise process, so why waste time when we can expedite the process with genetic modification and help the people here today.

Read More

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

1158 Words | 5 Pages

The DNA sequence for the target region should be known prior to PCR so it is not useful for regions in which the sequence is unknown. Ethical issues Some people are of the opinion that their DNA can be acquired by others easily. Also many believe that genetic engineering is unethical as manipulating DNA is unnatural.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Designer Baby

1025 Words | 5 Pages

Humans can never fully be able to successfully modify or prevent diseases in a human because "For example, diabetes, heart disease, or certain types of cancer -- are linked to several or even many genes, can't be predicted with any certainty, and depend also on environmental factors such as diets"(Ball). The human body is complicated, every part of the body relies on another, "The human genome is 3.2 billion letters, and in the wrong place a single typo -- a dozen or so misplaced atoms -- can create misery"(Peterson). To be messing around with the nature of anything is risky because one never knows the consequences or the possibility of the negative outcomes. We should not try to change who people are born to be because there are amazing people out there born with disabilities and who would want to change a person who is unique and beautiful in their own special way. A big example is when a Crispr engineer, "Ms. Doudna once revealed she had a son with Down syndrome. '

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Crispr

1202 Words | 5 Pages

Charo and Greely also note the highly beneficial nature and life-changing nature of CRISPR as they believed that “using CRISPR to cure disease by human somatic cell genome editing would be universally applauded, to make better biofuel sources would be widely endorsed,” (Charo 11). The authors noted how CRISPR has so much power to aid humanity through “novel forms of disease prevention,” and how it is almost unethical to not develop CRISPR as it has the ability to cure diseases like malaria (Charo 12). But, Charo and Greely also realized CRISPR has many ethical risks that are associated with it like if CRISPR is “not [used] for the purposes of saving lives, preventing climate change, feeding a growing humanity, or other valuable goals,” then there are risk factors (Charo 15). Another ethical dilemma that Charo saw, is that CRISPR will “[increase] the human footprint on the world,” thus putting greater strain on the ecosystems of the Earth (Charo 15). So, for Charo and Greely, although CRISPR is a powerful new technology that can lead to an improvement in human health and abilities, there are also ethical risks like the increasing damaging to the Earth’s ecosystems or the negative misuses of

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Bringing Back Extinct Animals

866 Words | 4 Pages

CRISPR gets a species related to the species that has gone extinct and then the genetically modify it. The end result of CRISPR is a species close to what it was but not completely the same. CRISPR is also cheaper than it was before, wich is great if we want to revive multiple species. The article Bringing extinct species back from the dead could hurt—not help—conservation efforts states, “The cost of caring for a population of resurrected mammoths, for instance, should be similar to the cost of caring for the endangered Asian elephant.” Nevertheless, there are downsides to De-extinction.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Genetic Modification

915 Words | 4 Pages

Since recent technological advances have made it possible to genetically modify DNA, society should use those resources to improve the quality of human life. Using this technology would be beneficial to mankind for many reasons. It would improve physical appearance, cure diseases and/or prevent them, and heighten the level of human intelligence. Though there is always the possibility of something going wrong there is also the possibility of it going right. It is also against some peoples moral beliefs but getting a better understanding of this technology should change that.

Read More

Why Genetic Engineering Is Bad

724 Words | 3 Pages

People think that this will make the next generation perfect, this is not entirely true. If every single person in the world was perfect, technically no one would be perfect. No one would be perfect because everyone would be the same, which kills the strive for something even better, perfection. Also, scientists say that this can cure all diseases by removing a certain gene. Scientists actually could remove a gene which causes disease, but this could end up introducing a new, more powerful disease to the body.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Gene Editing

1104 Words | 5 Pages

The researchers then combine the broken gene with a healthy gene. This new healthy gene is now modified and free from the mutation it had before. Although many individuals’ ethics and morals stand in the way of gene editing, this technology affects society in many different

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of CRISPR

Related Topics

Open Document