Although Leah Libresco is in favor of stopping people from dying of guns, she does not feel that standardized gun control is the right answer; therefore, the best way to deal with sensitive issues is by taking a personal approach to them. One gun control proposition is to ban silencers. Libresco does not feel that this is the right approach, and she uses a simile to prove her point; “An AR-15 with a silencer is about as loud as a jackhammer” (Libresco n.pag.). Comparing a silenced weapon to a jackhammer proves not only that silencers don’t truly silence a gun, but it also aids in Libresco’s attempt to prove that wide gun control is unwise. Jackhammers are cumbersome, unwieldy tools, just as mainstream gun control proposals are cumbersome and
They discuss how different rules and regulations make it difficult for the Second Amendment to remain significant. They also address gun-neutral laws and whether the Second Amendment is applicable to events like assault or disturbing the peace. I found their stance interesting and useful for my paper. This
One of the strongest arguments those that are against gun control have is the 2nd Amendment, which reads, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Though it seems that it is specifically stated that an individual’s right to own guns is protected by this amendment, those for gun control interpret this from a different angle. They believe that the Constitutional Amendment was aimed at militias, not the common people, and therefore individuals do not have undeniable rights to gun ownership. Those that believe that gun control would be a crime are firm believers that the Founding Fathers understood the need for citizens to own guns to protect themselves against government intrusion. Lawrence Hunter, Chairman of Revolution PAC, stated, “The Founders understood that the right to own and bear laws is as fundamental and as essential to maintaining liberty as are the rights of free speech, a free press, freedom of religion and the other protections
The 2nd Amendment of the American Constitution has been a part of American history since 1791. It protects the people’s right to possess weapons for their own protection. Gun-related violence has been occurring over the past centuries, but it is incomparable to what society is currently facing today. “When it comes to gun
Gun control has been a hot debate for many years now because of all the violence. Many government officials, citizens, and lobbyist have been debating over gun control for over a century and still there has not been an answer to the current debate. With the rise in gun violence people believe that gun control will take the Constitutional right away from U.S. citizens. Changing any of the gun laws will not stop gun violence; it will only take away the second amendment right.
Despite what most pro gun control Americans think, gun control doesn’t lower crime, it actually raises it. With this said, when we look at right-to-carry states, which are states that make it easier to carry and buy guns, we see that, “The violent crime rate is 24% lower than the rest of the U.S., the murder rate that is 28% lower, and the robbery rate that is 50% lower” (Agresti & Smith, 2015). Two states that prove this are Florida and Texas. “On October 1, 1987, Florida pass a right to carry law which allows citizens to easily get and carry guns in public” (Agresti & Smith, 2015). Ever since the Florida right-to-carry law was enacted, the Florida murder rate has averaged 36% lower than it was before the law took effect (see Appendix D for
Children about as young as 4-5 know exactly where their parents keep firearms. About 35 percent of these children admitted to already using these weapons. Gun violence has been around since the existence of guns. The government has put some laws on guns in the past, but it seems people still refuse to follow them. The United States does not need stricter gun control because it will not be effective and will only cause more issues.
There are many different current events surrounding gun control, such as criminals people being able to own guns. Gun control should not be a topic up for discussion because the Constitution protects the rights of all citizens to own guns within reason. Gun control right now is set to where people that are criminals can not own guns, you have to register all guns purchased, and there is a minimum number set for number of rounds you can have in the clip at a time. The government needs to keep gun control at what it is right now because if they change it, it is imposing on the second amendment if they try to prevent people from owning guns, and does not deter criminals or prevent mass shootings.
The Second Amendment of the United States constitution reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The right of all Americans to bear arms is a right the Founding Fathers held to equal importance as the constitution itself. (The Guardian, 2017). The idea of gun control laws directly violates this constitutional right. The NRA believes that gun control should not be under consideration.
Gun Control A country without violence would be a great place. Gun violence is the number 1 cause of casualties in the USA, but it’s the person behind the trigger who does the damage. Guns are weapons, but not all weapons are used for harm. I believe gun violence is an issue, but won’t be controlled by stricter gun laws.
Do any of you believe gun control will help or make problems worst? There have been many mass shootings happening all over the world and Obama wants gun control. Gun control is laws that control how guns are sold, used and who can own them. Stricter gun control laws do not infringe the people’s right to bear arms.
The Second Amendment guarantees law-abiding Americans the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. But over time, gun control laws have placed limits on that freedom. Some politicians and gun control proponents argue that these laws are necessary — even at the cost of infringing upon a fundamental American right. But the fact is, gun control doesn’t work the way advocates argue it does. What is Gun Control?
Guns; Made to Protect not to Harm If guns kill people, then pencils misspell words, cars make people drive drunk, and spoons make people gain weight. The 2nd Amendment under the Constitution states, ¨The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed¨ ( qtd. In Burgan 38). Today the decision of whether to infringe on the right to bear arms is a heavily debated topic.
One of the main arguments against gun control is that it violates the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, which guarantees the right to bear arms. This right was intended to protect the individual's right to defend themselves against tyranny, as well as the ability to participate in the common defense of the nation. In a 2008 Supreme Court decision, District of Columbia v. Heller, the court held that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual's right to own a firearm for self-defense within their home. This decision affirmed that the Second Amendment is an individual right, and not just a collective right to maintain a militia. (District of
For people that supports guns and don't want stricter laws, this amendment means that people have the right to own guns. This is one of the most used and most common argument for people against gun control. The thing about the Second Amendment is that what it says is correct, but it is unfair to some people. When people use this as an argument, they don't realize the other side of the amendment. Look at it this way, the people who go by this amendment will go on and carry guns, because they have the right to, but the other people who don't want to have guns or be in their presence will feel even more scared.
