ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Non-Proliferation

1696 Words7 Pages

Introduction
The nuclear non-proliferation treaty (Known as the NPT) was introduced in 1968, according to the UN1to “Prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology”, while promoting the peaceful uses of nuclear knowledge. Although the treaty was introduced in 1968, it only came into action in 1970. To this day, 191 states are part of the treaty. This extended essay will be evaluating how effective this non-proliferation treaty is in the prevention of the spread of nuclear arms, while still maintaining the spreading of peaceful nuclear energy. This essay will therefore delve into the different viewpoints, and factors, which determine how effective the treaty is.

Sections of the treaty
A summary of NPT‘s sections2 are:
Article I: Any member of the treaty must not transfer any nuclear weapons, or other nuclear explosive devices, or control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly. While not assisting, encouraging or inducing any non-nuclear-weapon state to manufacture or otherwise acquire said devices
Article II: Each non-nuclear weapon state in the party must not receive the transfer from any party of …show more content…

This can be seen as still being the case today – as some believe the only method for encouragement is to demonstrate the disbarment. This is a well-known fact, as the START agreement between the US and Russia (The states with the largest stockpiles) means they aim to their stockpile to just …. By 2020, in an attempt to encourage states to encourage non-proliferation. Despite this, others argue this is simply ineffective, as although the nuclear arsenal is being reduced, new nuclear weapons are being built. The new nuclear weapons being more advanced, and some becoming miniature – thus enabling nuclear states to use them in the battlefield without having as large impact on enemy territory. This weapons replacement programme is known as

Show More
Related

Comparing Leadership And Economic Policies Of Presidents Reagan And Franklin Roosevelt

1118 Words | 5 Pages

The Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) of 1991 was between the United States and the Soviet Union. START largest arms control treaty there had ever been. It was to reduce missiles and other short and long range arms. Nuclear arms reduced dramatically during this treaty and lasted until 2009. The first START worked well and continued after 2009 through START II.

Read More

Summary Of From The Grass Roots To The Summit

1481 Words | 6 Pages

The US heavy-handedly pressured them to refrain from nuclear exports, specifically in the German-Brazilian deal. The US’ loud voice instilled the pact set forth in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1968. Until 1974 most nations had approached nuclear weapons and civilian uses of nuclear energy separately. Both sides in outlining their grievances towards each other often used article 4. “All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.”

Read More

Cold War Dbq

1298 Words | 6 Pages

Also the way that President John F. Kennedy was able to make a treaty, Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty on July 25, 1963. between the U.S and USSR to make sure both sides aren’t testing nuclear weapons in open air or in the

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Russell-Einstein Manifesto

1094 Words | 5 Pages

This is a powerful argument, as it appeals to the emotions of the reader by suggesting a devastating and irreversible outcome if nuclear weapons are not abolished. They warn, “Shall we put an end to the human race, or shall mankind renounce war?” This statement is a stark reminder of the potential consequences of our actions and the need to work together to prevent such a catastrophic event. The authors argue that the use of nuclear weapons would result in the destruction of civilization as we know it. They claim that the only way to prevent a nuclear war is to eliminate nuclear weapons altogether.

Read More

Should The United States Abolish Nuclear Weapons Dbq Essay

688 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the years of 1945 and 1991, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were involved in what is today is identified as the Cold War. During this dark time many lived in fear due to the newest weapon that would be used in war, nuclear weapons. These weapons caused fear throughout the whole world because of their capability to kill thousands with just one. Today many debate over the abolition of nuclear weapons in the United States. Some argue that the U.S. should abolish nuclear weapons, while others say nuclear weapons should not be abolished in the United States.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Atoms For Peace

887 Words | 4 Pages

Before his election to the presidency, Dwight Eisenhower sought to contain the atom’s destructive power (). Yet, in his first speech at the United Nations as President of the United States, Eisenhower argued for the normalization of the international proliferation of nuclear technology (Office of the President, 1953). The motivation behind his now famous “Atoms for Peace” speech illuminates an interesting contradiction between the obvious American nonproliferation objectives and the president’s political calculation. The key to understanding this contradiction is to separate Eisenhower’s contemporary political motivations from the consequences of the president’s choice to pursue international proliferation of peaceful nuclear technology.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Lowther And Mcmahon

199 Words | 1 Pages

Blake Mcmahon and Adam Lowther look back to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, describe the destruction the bombing had caused, and acknowledge people’s concern regarding the danger of nuclear weapons. They counter the assumption of nuclear danger by asserting that if a country launch nuclear weapons it will spark deadly response from other nations. The nuclear characteristic of deterrent, they argued, is exemplified in the Cold War, in which the United States and the Soviet Union hindered themselves from the brink of war due to the horrific possibility of a nuclear war. Mcmahon and Lowther claim that nuclear weapons are still essential deterrents for the United States against countries that are developing nuclear weapons

Read More

The Effects Of Photography And Film On WWII

1429 Words | 6 Pages

The atrocities during the war (the Holocaust and atomic bombings) precipitated a worldwide dialogue concerning international cooperation and safeguarding human rights. Subsequently, one pivotal solution emerged in 1945 by establishing the United Nations to prevent future wars while engendering concordance amongst states. These events highlighted that nuclear weaponry's destructive capability significantly influenced views on arms control policies, compelling public advocacy for disarming efforts (Dower par. 17). The bombings also acted as a caution against the likelihood of disastrous destruction in the event of future confrontations. They aided in encouraging international efforts to inhibit the dispersion of nuclear weapons.

Read More

Martin Luther King Jr Research Paper

485 Words | 2 Pages

One of Michael King Sr. and Alberta Williams King’s child was Martin Luther King Jr on January 15, 1929. His usual name was Michael King Jr. He had an older sister, Willie Christine, and a younger brother, Alfred Daniel Williams King. They grew up in a secure and loving environment. Their father fought against racial prejudice because he considered racism and segregation to be an insult to God’s will.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Non-Proliferation

163 Words | 1 Pages

Both superpowers recognized that the first requirement of an effective deterrent was that it should survive or "ride out" a surprise "counterforce" targeted attack without being decimated. This led to use of three different types of delivery systems (bombers, missiles, and submarines) to assure that a second-strike capability existed able to cause massive destruction to the attacking nation. Moreover, By Non-proliferation of 1968, it is composed of international initiatives to prevent proliferation WMDs. Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty was a contract signed in 1968 by several major promises of cooperation in the nuclear and non- nuclear weapon states stemming the spread of nuclear technology .

Read More

What Is Military's Unbalanced Power

543 Words | 3 Pages

This plan stops conflicts, and promotes the idea of unnecessary nuclear

Read More

Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

888 Words | 4 Pages

Yet, certainly no individual would halt this technology if he/she knew other countries were producing it. This ever growing fear of vulnerability to other countries is what confines the United States and the world to nuclear weaponry. Uncertain of other countries’ intents and missile arsenals, the United States believes that having these weapons protects its citizens from death. This sustained fear is a major contributor as to why nuclear weaponry remains so

Read More

Nuclear Deterrence Essay

685 Words | 3 Pages

III - The Origin of Nuclear Deterrence Presidents, Secretaries of Defense, Generals and scholars alike have studied and debated deterrence theory extensively since the birth of the atomic bomb. From 1945 until 1949, the U.S. was the only country to possess nuclear weapons, but the Soviet Union was significantly stronger from a conventional weaponry and force structure standpoint. In 1949, the Soviets detonated their first nuclear device. This was the first evolution in deterrence as it made the battlefield more evenly matched. It was the beginning of what would be later termed as “a stable balance of power” and it also presented “the threat that leaves something to chance” for both sides as stated in Thomas Schelling’s book Arms and Influence.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Iran's Nuclear Weapon

748 Words | 3 Pages

Soon after, Iran signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, stating it

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Banning The Atomic Bomb

862 Words | 4 Pages

Proliferation groups are trying to get the US to lead the way and destroying and disarming their atomic bombs in hopes that other countries will follow. Forster proposes these ideas in his own words. "The goal of the treaty is to "prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament."(Forster). The US cannot just say disarm your weapons and not do the same themselves. The US needs to take charge and start things themselves.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Non-Proliferation

Related Topics

Open Document