ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Soda Ban

733 Words3 Pages

¨A lot of times we have a good idea of where we want to go, but a really bad idea of how to get there. Its well established by now that we don't think very clearly when it comes to choose the best means to attain our ends¨(Conly). The most drinks da ban is a ban put in place by Mayor Bloomberg that restricts( the ones over sixteen ounces.) Only convenient stores can sell drinks over sixteen ounces. So as a whole society we need to go for the best choices. Although drinking soda can be fun, it's good for people to limit their soda they can purchase. If a person limits their amount of soda they intake, they will get excelling healthier, restrict the cognitive bias, and sugar in soda will stop being addicting. The first reason to support the claim that the soda ban should be put in place for excelling health is ¨[Soda´s] bad for you, especially in large quantities” according to Karin Klein(Klein). This shows that the soda ban should be put in place because people would have to think about the soda they would be drinking and buying. Not to mention there are many …show more content…

The opposing side is incorrect because sugar is addicting. The elected official that does take a stand will stop soda so that it will be less of an annoying bad habit for people. This illustrates that the soda ban should be stopped and would stop people from drinking soda so they don't get addicted. This also means that the person's sugar levels won't go through the roof. A piece of evidence that supports this is that ¨ The crucial point is that in some situations it's just difficult for us to take in information and choose accordingly¨ (Conly). What she is trying to say is that people have the option to drink the soda of their choice or other drinks. There are other beverages that people offer. People just can't make the best decision for them so the soda ban should be put in

Show More
Related
343 Words | 2 Pages

The New York State Court of Appeals ultimately made the right decision to block Bloomberg’s “soda ban”. There are some things that you can’t do, and there are some things that you aren’t allowed to do. The New York City Board of Health exceeded its regulatory authority by adopting the “Sugary Drinks Portion cap Rule”. “...The New York City Board of Health, in adopting

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

One reason why I'm against the ban is the government shouldn't be the ones making decisions for us. For example, in "Ban the Ban" by SidneyAnne Stone, she stated that "People might think it is not important because it is just soda but it is so much more than that—it is about freedom and the

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

Should soda really be considered as hazardous or toxic as people make it seem? In the texts “Three Cheers for the Nanny State”, “Ban the Ban”, and “Sodas a Problem But…”, it all shows evidence on how the soda ban is good or how it is bad. Also they talk about how it is harmful but is it really that harmful to where there is a need to ban it. Although some people may think the soda ban is a great idea there are numerous downsides to it such as only eliminating certain sizes, more harmful things to worry about, and that fact that there is no purpose behind the ban. The soda ban is a bad idea because it only eliminates certain sizes over 16oz.

Read More
587 Words | 3 Pages

This displays the idea of the “slippery slope” mentioned in the same article. The evidence proves that the soda ban should not have even been considered in the first place because nothing is wrong with a company selling legal drinks to consumers. Others argue that the soda ban is helpful, because it encourages a healthier lifestyle. The soda ban would decrease obesity and

Read More
684 Words | 3 Pages

“That’s what life is all about, isn’t it? Choices, informed decisions... what I do not respect is having my civil liberties stripped away.” , stated by Karin Klein in the short article, Ban the Ban!. One of the many values of the American life, is freedom, but to have options of what you can drink, to be taken away from you isn’t honestly moral.

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

The government should not regulate personal choices like it did with the New York City soda ban because it violates the U.S. Constitution and what it stands for. The soda ban is causing people to not make their own choice on what they want to buy. One reason the soda ban is bad is because it has stripped the rights of the citizens that live in New York. I say this because the soda ban has removed the rights of the citizens that America has given them. The ninth amendment allows U.S citizens the right to privacy and freedom of choice.

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

To begin with, the soda ban would benefit the public because soda is the reason why numerous of people are unhealthy. According to

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

Choice. It is one of the basic human rights everyone should have. However, sometimes the ability to make your own choice is hindered. When New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg proposed a law to ban large-sized sugary drinks, the city was splintered. Some people believed it was the right thing to do while others disagreed.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

Furthermore, Cigarettes affect more than one person. The Soda Ban is something we shouldn't be worried about if we have another problem possibly killing someone faster and quickly. Despite the mentions of it reducing health issues, the ban still does not deserve to be put in place since there are other severe problems that should be discussed

Read More
307 Words | 2 Pages

people will still eat what they want if there was a ban or not. people will still go to the store and buy large sodas from the grocery store. Others may disagree with me because the ban of large size sodas will help obesity. people think sodas have a lot of sugar for it not be food. Others think that causes people to be obese quicker.

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

They can argue that a ban on sugary drinks could help improve health problems such as obesity. Although it may seem reasonable like a reasonable solution, it can actually have negative effects on people. What good is a law when it can’t solve the issue it was made for. Therefore, the soda ban should not be put in place due to how it doesn’t solve the health problems it was made for. In the Washington times article by Samantha Gross, Joy Dubost, a nutritionist who works for the National Restaurant Association, explains what problems that limiting soda can cause.

Read More
711 Words | 3 Pages

A 20 oz bottle has 17 teaspoons or 65 grams of sugar or high fructose corn syrup, strongly associated with diabetes and many other diseases. The soda is so addictive and its really good. People should do what they want and not be controlled by the ban and let the problems be on themselves. Yes it can be addictive but you have to know where you stand with an addiction. Caffeine is the world's most popular psychoactive drug and it's reported that more than 80% of Americans have it in some form every day.

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

The soda ban is a defective idea in itself because of the loopholes in the plan. As Karin Klien talks about the problem in her article “Sodas a Problem but…”, “Convenience stores such as 7-Eleven are overseen by State and would be exempt , but a Burger King across the street would be restricted” (Klien, 288). In addition, there isn’t a need for this soda ban because it makes no sense for a customer at a fast food restaurant (like Subway) to walk across the street and go to a 7-eleven, which is a state-ran store that has drinks that are over 16oz., and even over 64oz. People could even go to a grocery store and buy a 2-liter bottle of the sugary drink because it isn’t run by the city. Another way the soda ban contradicts itself is because of how you’d get the same amount of sugar if you were to drink a drink from a smoothie

Read More
469 Words | 2 Pages

However, the ban was only on drinks like soda, not milkshakes, and not in all locations, either. The counterarguments to the ban included that it infringed on people’s liberties and that it actually was not efficient. According to one poll, people bought more soda when offered smaller portions than when buying larger portion. Additionally, 60% of New Yorkers opposed the

Read More
593 Words | 3 Pages

Each year, billions of gallons of soda are sold in the United States alone.” Soda must be allowed to middle schoolers during school hours. Soda should be allowed because kids need more of a choice at school and soda is not the cause of all the bad stuff. Soda must be allowed at middle school because kids need more of a choice at school. At many schools the only things to drink are milk, water, and a few other juices you have to pay extra for.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Soda Ban

Related Topics

Open Document