¨A lot of times we have a good idea of where we want to go, but a really bad idea of how to get there. Its well established by now that we don't think very clearly when it comes to choose the best means to attain our ends¨(Conly). The most drinks da ban is a ban put in place by Mayor Bloomberg that restricts( the ones over sixteen ounces.) Only convenient stores can sell drinks over sixteen ounces. So as a whole society we need to go for the best choices. Although drinking soda can be fun, it's good for people to limit their soda they can purchase. If a person limits their amount of soda they intake, they will get excelling healthier, restrict the cognitive bias, and sugar in soda will stop being addicting. The first reason to support the claim that the soda ban should be put in place for excelling health is ¨[Soda´s] bad for you, especially in large quantities” according to Karin Klein(Klein). This shows that the soda ban should be put in place because people would have to think about the soda they would be drinking and buying. Not to mention there are many …show more content…
The opposing side is incorrect because sugar is addicting. The elected official that does take a stand will stop soda so that it will be less of an annoying bad habit for people. This illustrates that the soda ban should be stopped and would stop people from drinking soda so they don't get addicted. This also means that the person's sugar levels won't go through the roof. A piece of evidence that supports this is that ¨ The crucial point is that in some situations it's just difficult for us to take in information and choose accordingly¨ (Conly). What she is trying to say is that people have the option to drink the soda of their choice or other drinks. There are other beverages that people offer. People just can't make the best decision for them so the soda ban should be put in