Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reducing gun violence
The necessarity of gun control
The necessarity of gun control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reducing gun violence
The necessarity of gun control
The necessarity of gun control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
National Rifle Association is a special interest group that lobbies for the rights of gun owners and works to protect the 2nd Amendment. The House Armed Services Committee (Politicians) funds the ATF (Bureaucrats) and provides political support. The NRA works to insure that the 2nd Amendment is never breached.
Passing gun control legislation that creates a universal background check and gun database system as well as passing mental health legislation that improves the health care system’s protocols and policies for assisting people with mental health disorders and that enacts counseling programs in communities and schools will decrease the likelihood of mass shootings in schools. The United States is bitterly divided. Issues of great concern, such as the rise of mass shootings, are partisanized. Both sides of the debate will not comprise or listen to what their opponents have to say. Groups from both sides can only agree that one innocent life taken from gun violence is one too many.
Statistics show that comparable to other democratic nations the United states has a higher proportion of gun related violent incidents than those states where gun control legislation has been adopted. An example would be the case of the United Kingdom, which had approximately 2,261 Violence Against the Person (VAP) Offences involving firearms, including low velocity Air weapons in 2015/16 . If this is then compared to the United States which had, in the same period, 9,616 gun related murders and a million VAP offences that did not end in a fatality, then it can be argued that the NRA’s outdated mantra is illogical . There are many further problems with the NRA argument that can be identified in the modern era. , but the main issue would be the NRA’s reasons for the existence of the Amendment.
I agree with Kleck and feel that gun control organizations definitely have a moral obligation to be honest in their statistics and also take into consideration the opposing side. This issue reminds me on what is happening within our government where democrats and republicans do not simply want to give in to reason. They are so preoccupied with winning instead of having a pro-active approach with discussions to allow problems to be resolved which both sides approve. Instead, these gun organizations seek to cover their actual agenda by stating that they are not actually for the prohibition of guns, but instead want to regulate them.
Were you aware of the, quite frankly horrifying fact that there is an average of one mass shooting per day within the United States of America? Or that, despite the population of America being only approximately 4.2% of the world population, we, as a nation, possess nearly half of the world’s civilian-owned firearms? Firearm-related legislation is almost always controversial, and has been throughout the United States’ past, ever since the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States was ratified on 15 December 1791. The Amendment was inspired by William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, in which he stated that, to paraphrase, the right to bear arms under English law is in reference to the “natural right” of resistance and self-defense against tyranny and oppression. While this may have been considered to be a possibility during that era, there are many reasons why this is not so today.
The NRA is the National Rifle Association. They believe that everyone should be allowed to own a firearm because of our rights. Every Time congress tries to pass a gun law the NRA will do everything in their power to stop it. What the NRA does is they give money to people running for congress, but the people running have to agree with the NRA. If they don 't agree then the NRA with take all of their money out and ruin the chances of that person making it.
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. "(www.law.cornell.edu). This document was written in 1775 and ratified in 1787, and from that day the amendment still stands. So, in a constructivist point of view is there still a need for a well regulated militia in the United States or is the second amendment outdated and should be trimmed with the new fabric of America? My personal opinion on the matter is with the new age of America becoming more hostile every day, there will be always a need for a milita.
The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights is the right to bear arms, which gives American citizens a constitutional right to own and purchase guns. It states, "A well-regulated
The pros on gun control is very obvious yet not put into use because of many other opinions on it. The pros of gun control can be significant. One significance would be that gun control can dramatically drop murder rates involved by firearms and also the percentage in the total estimation by violent crimes. As a stated quote in Gun.laws.com “Out of those crimes, just over 500,000 involved the use of firearms, which is about 8% of the total estimation of violent crimes.” This information shows already how many firearms are involved in crimes and supposedly firearms are about 8% of the estimation on real serious violent crimes!
2nd Amendment Gun Control, I believe that we need to have guns. we can do about taking out shootings if you take guns away from good people then they can't defend themselves, then we can't hunt for food, and we can't have protection. we dont want to have no guns and the government to have all the power. even if they try to take the guns away they won't get most of the guns. We need to have that right to have our guns our protection to defend ourselves from robbers and the government if it goes bad.
The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the individual to keep and bear firearms. When the Second Amendment was written it was for the right to arm oneself as a personal liberty to deter undemocratic or oppressive governing bodies from forming and to repel impending invasions. Furthermore, gun advocates proclaim that guns are for the right to self-defense. Some people try to participate and uphold the law. We have seen how guns in the hands of children can cause fatal accidents and people have committed mindless crimes leading to
There is a very heated and divided debate going on in America. This debate would be over gun control and more specifically the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment protects the individual's rights to bear arms. It comes down to whether or not gun control regulations should be tightened and if they should then they would most likely interfere with an individual's right to bear arms. Many people believe there should be stricter gun laws, however it would interfere with people's existing rights.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. ", states the Second Amendment. Guns should not be illegal because it is the people who don’t follow the laws that are committing crimes with guns. Guns are a source of protection. We use these guns to keep criminals out of our homes.
Weapons are used excessively all over the world. Many people say that making gun owning legal is a bad thing concerning politics, the economy and social life in general. Making a gun owning legal is not a good idea because it leads to crimes and violence between people and specially politicians, for example for example if someone doesn’t like one of the politicians he will find it easy to kill or to attack when he owns a gun. So politics will be affected badly. Gun owning should not be legal because it will damage the economic statue in the country, with owning a gun legally and daily will make people more violent and aggressive that can commit a crime easily so the tourists for example who are the main source of the economy will get
"’Make no mistake -- they 're coming for our guns. And we freedom-loving gun lovers are totally defenseless! Other than, you know, the guns’ -Stephen Colbert” (Kurtzman 1). There are as many people who advocate for pro gun laws as the people who are opposed, which is the reason why gun control has become one of the most controversial topics as of right now. America is truly split between those who advocate for gun control and those who are opposed.