ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

1202 Words5 Pages

Many people have their own views on animal testing in laboratory research. In this essay there will be three main topics that will be the focus of this paper. The first topic will be on people that are for animal testing because they believe that animal testing is a necessity for humans and the way they live now. Another point of view that many have on this topic is that animals should not be used at all for any kinds of animal testing form cosmetics to vaccines. The last and final view that many people have on this topic is that animals should only and only be used on research that will help humanity such as for vaccines or new medications that will help strengthen the population.
What caused the issue? People saying that the way animals are being tested in laboratories is inhumane and wrong, while other people say that it is a necessity that has helped to expand the medical world into …show more content…

Meanwhile other people don’t lean into any side of the argument and could care less about the issue. What prompted past and present interest in it? I am interested in this topic because when I am an adult I am planning to become a veterinarian and animals have always interested me. To know that animals were being used in laboratories for research hooked my attention because I was not sure if I supported this act or was against it. Who is interested in the issue and why? The people that would be interested in animal testing would be vegetarians, doctors of some sorts, and veterinarians, and most importantly the general public. Many people believe that animal testing should be used because it has helped to enlarge the advances in medical discoveries’. One of the main claims for people who advocate this position is that “Antibiotics, insulin, vaccines for polio and cervical cancer, organ transplantation, HIV treatments, heart-bypass surgery - it reads like an A to Z of medical progress” (Blakemore). Their reason for this is that “Where there are reliable

Show More
Related
1188 Words | 5 Pages

The ethics revolving around animal rights and animal testing are highly controversial. A large scale of people in the United States say that animals deserve some protection from misuse, while other Americans argue animals are worthy of the same rights as humans. However, a quarter of Americans object banning medical research, which results from animal testing. A clear majority of people if they were tied up or injected with substances into the bloodstream or inhalation and force-feeding would lean towards declining the studies. As for animals, we are their voice and give them no option but to be tested on and when finished it either results in death or sold to another laboratory.

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

Since the emergence of bio medicine, animal testing has been a focal point of controversy. Those opposed to the use of animals in scientific studies believe that it is important for humans to treat all living things with the same respect. Animal rights activists make the argument that we should not do anything to a piglet for example, that we would not want done to our own infants. In spite of these points, animal testing is a crucial part of advancing biology, medicine and the overall welfare of human life. It is justified for scientists to have a more invasive form of research ethics towards animals as opposed to humans as the benefits far outweigh the consequences.

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

Although there are many benefits and advancements that come with animal testing, there are downsides to all the procedures that are performed. There are individuals that are not in favor of animal experimentation but still support the testing for medical purposes. Over the prior years, the practice of using animals for medical and cosmetic research has been severely criticised (Hajar 42). Going back to the article, “Animals and Medical Testing,” Hajar notes that those opposed to practices believe that the benefits that humans get with the procedures performed do not favor the harm to animals (Hajar 42). Even though testing on animals is useful for our well-being, the animals that are being tested on can be harmed in the process.

Read More
1348 Words | 6 Pages

But despite the so-called benefits it brings, there is no doubt that the issue is heavily surrounded by controversy, thus highlighting the obvious malice associated with it. There are pros and cons to everything. Yet, in cases such as this one, I believe not that animal testing should be completely abolished, but that it should be severely be cut down to be used only for scientific discovery and medical cures. Testing animals for commercial reasons highlight not only the blatant immorality of it, but the indefectible alternatives that can replace it, and the important technicalities that are not covered or resolved by animal testing procedures; however, under necessary conditions animal testing should be permitted when absolutely crucial for the medical and scientific

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing gets overlooked in today’s society, nobody realizes the negative effects of it. The public also doesn’t know what goes on behind their backs during the processes of scientific research. Vets may claim that the animal testing is being done for scientific research but ninety percent of the animals that are tested in the US labs are not included in the official statistics of animal testing (“11 Facts about Animal Testing”). It wouldn’t be a problem if the testing wasn’t affecting the animals but is has became cruel and inhumane to them in many ways. Animals used in experimenting are normally forced inhalation, forced feeding, and prolonged periods of physical restraint (“Should Animals be Tested for Scientific or Commercial Testing?”) .

Read More
1138 Words | 5 Pages

Animal testing has always interested me. I always knew without medical experiments conducted on animals none of our medical breakthroughs would have been made possible. However subjecting animals to pain and suffering creates a moral dilemma. In my research, I found that strict policies are put in place both federal and state. Also funding for animal based research is often difficult to obtain, and once it is, their experiments are heavily regulated.

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

“There is compelling justification for using animals in laboratory research: Science using animals cures diseases and mitigates the suffering of human beings, among other animals” (Webb). The debates that take place about this controversial topic will remain as there are both pros and cons to killing animals according to some people. One person may find their own animals more imperative than most people. “Johnson feels that the IACUC and other regulatory structures work, helping researchers navigate the ethics of animal research” (Webb). In these two quotes, Webb explains the two controversial topics of animal rights.

Read More
658 Words | 3 Pages

Although animals have no rights like humans, Cohen states that it is the moral responsibility of humans to ensure that biomedical research is done humanely and to minimize pain and suffering of animals being used for the greater good of humanity (688). Since “1966, the Federal Animal Wellness Act have been regulating animal experimentation” and researchers must have an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) which ensures humane treatment of animals used in research (“Animal Testing”). When comparing “the number of animals used in research it is but the tiniest fraction of the total used to satisfy assorted human appetites” that includes hunting as a sport; killing animals for the sake of killing is wrong and should be addressed (Cohen 695). Animals that sacrifice their lives during biomedical research die for the greater good of

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

The issue with animal testing is that it is cruel and diabolical, drugs that pass animal tests are not positively safe, and there is alternative testing that can replace the need for animals. Furthermore this essay will explain why animals have the right not to be used as experiments. Animal testing is immensely cruel and barbarous. Some people disagree and state that animal testing has contributed too many life-saving treatment and cures. While this may be true, it still doesn’t change the fact that numerous

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

Animals are an important part of our life, they provide us with food, clothing, companionship, and our healthy lives. Animals, for many centuries have been subject to the tests of man, but now there is a debate of whether animals should be used for these tests or not. Animals should be used for testing because they can be used in ways humans cannot, they themselves are the cures to some diseases, also animals as well as humans benefit from these tests. People who argue that animals should not be tested have their reasons. They say that animal testing is cruel and inhumane, animals do not provide results that correctly depict human results, and they say that animal tests are more expensive than modern alternative methods.

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

Researchers estimated over 26 million animals were used for scientific tests and commercial testing subject every year in the United States. Over the years animals were used to be tested on medical treatments, products for human uses, health care, and etc. The practice of researching on living animals has started since 500 BC. Opponents of this act say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, there are other methods available to replace the cruel act of experimenting on living animals, and that the human bodies and animal’s bodies are totally two different features and the research often yields irrelevant results. The federal Animal Welfare or AWA passed the animal testing act in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.

Read More
922 Words | 4 Pages

Aylin Doğaner 21363593 Section 1 INTRODUCTION Hey everyone. Today we are going to talk about why animals shouldn’t be used for research. First I’ll make the introduction. Then Gökçen will explain why animal experimentation is cruel and inhumane,Deniz will mention alternative testing technologies that can replace the need for animals,Sevim will point out the differences between animals and human beings and invalidity of animal research,.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is not ok for so many reasons. The first I have to say is about the hardship and pain to the animals. Animals feel pain along with humans, so why do we test on them? What if a bunch of giant animals took you from your natural home, nearly starved you, then tested on you with weird equipment in someplace strange? Yeah, pretty awful.

Read More
1185 Words | 5 Pages

One of the most widely discussed issues is the argument over animal testing. Millions of animals at this moment are locked in cold cages of laboratories to be tested on. About 26.9 million animals each year are sacrificed and tested on under the name of medical research. All kinds of animals are needed for medical research such as amphibians, reptiles, birds, rats, mice, etc. Supporters say animal testing is beneficial for medical research and also a key discovery to all sorts of new cures and medicines.

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

Imagine an enraged animal rights activist charging toward a scientist in a white lab coat, desperate to free the little mice that are being used as test subjects. Although comical, this scene may be quite accurate when describing the passion that animal lovers have when it comes to the touchy subject of animal testing. For centuries, animal testing has been used in the medical research field, however many are now beginning to question whether it is ethical. Millions of animals are killed per year due to animal testing, so is this practice worth banning? Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document