ipl-logo

Arguments Against Standardized Testing

467 Words2 Pages

Standardized Testing
You are sitting in the classroom and the teacher says you have a test tomorrow, and suddenly you freeze up, sweat starts coming down your face you get that feeling of anxiety in your chest. Standardized Testing has been around for about 50 years now but recently they have became more pressure- packed and ubiquitous on teens. Many individuals feel as tho Standardized Testing such as the SATs, ACTs,Eogs, and Eocs do not measure their true intelligence it is indeed a waste of time and payment. People feel as tho these test are never based upon anything they know and that it is rigged so that they can not succeed. Standardized Testing does not measure the true intelligence of teens because the test do not have any thing that will furthermore help people in the future, it is only subject based not personality or mentally based.
THE TEST …show more content…

Meghan Magruder says “ I don't think that today’s youth should be defined by a test score. We should be defined by our actions and personalities and not by what a test or machine tells us. These test also place huge amounts of stress on students not only the test itself but because it is also timed. The scholar only gets a couple of minutes to finish each section, of course the student is going to lose sight of the test and just focus on how much time they have left causing them to forget some of the things they’ve learned. Vadik Vasil states that Standardized Testing are nothing more than a long list of trick questions and irrational thoughts, he says “This insults me, and in no way is this an adequate measure of my

Open Document