More handpicked essays just for you.
Traits of autocratic leadership style
Advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership
Autocratic leadership theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There are three basic leadership styles, they consist of: authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-faire. Leaders who utilize the authoritarian style of leadership give orders, are involved in most if not all decisions, and expect absolute adherence to their directives. Conversely, leaders who favor the laissez-faire style of leadership allow subordinates almost absolute freedom, giving little to no direction. Somewhere in the middle of these two styles, is the democratic style. Democratic leaders gather a consensus from their subordinates or constituents considering their opinions on an issue, before making a final decision on the issue.
The way in which a leader selects their style of leadership is predominantly motivated by their underlying priorities and motives concerning the position at hand. These priorities are linked to the goals that the leader themselves wishes to accomplish in their position, but are often influenced by a variety of factors that are derived from two main concerns, the overall well-being of the institution under the leader’s administration and the approval of the people within that institution. The relationship between public approval and the well-being of the institution is often dichotomous in nature, which results in the leader having to make decisions that gravitate towards one side of the spectrum. This conflict between what is good for the institution
Although there are three leadership styles, only two of them should be performed in the work force. A combination between autocratic and democratic could make a good leader/manager. One should know how to pull back and when to direct without questions. Laissez-faire shouldn’t even be an option of a leadership quality for a long term. This most likely will end in confusion or someone taking over in command.
The four main leadership styles are autocratic, democratic, laissez- faire, and paternalistic. Autocratic is referred to as an authoritarian or “all-powerful”
Even though this style of leadership may be considered archaic, it still offers many benefits to current teams and their goal-achieving processes. The major pros of the autocratic leadership style, as stated by Joseph (n.d.) are: - Quick decision-making processes. Since the leader is the only one who makes decisions through this style of leadership, there is no waste of time. The leader is the sole responsible for the decision made and therefore it can be made quickly in order to keep up with the competition or prevent problems. - There is close oversight of subordinates.
Coercive- The coercive leadership style was first mentioned by Daniel Goleman in conjunction with the six leadership styles defined in his theory of Emotional Intelligence. The Coercive Leader is the person rules by fear, coercive leader demands immediate compliance. The coercive leadership is most useful in the time of crisis like in a company turnaround or a takeover attempt. The coercive style can also help control a problem teammate when everything else has failed.
If people aren't optimistic, they're not going to make the sacrifices and do the work required to turn things around. It's a remarkably humble leadership style. To understand the leadership analysis at Ford, we will have to first understand the various types of leadership styles. 1. Autocratic Leadership: The autocratic leadership style allows managers to make decisions alone without the input of others.
Leadership Analysis Introduction One of the popular definitions of a leader is, "The only definition of a leader is someone who has followers." ( ) A more comprehensive definition that highlights striking features of a leader is, "A simple definition of leadership is that leadership is the art of motivating a group of people to act towards achieving a common goal.” ( ) A closer scrutiny of the characteristics of an influential leader would many ways assist one, in recognizing those attributes in an attempt to assimilate the best in others.
moreover, if a manager gets positive results from his leadership style he will be preferring to use that style in the future. Regardless of Leadership style certain types of leadership behavior can have a positive effect on an individual or group. Firstly, a leader must be dependable. If he possesses this behavior a team member will be more confident and trust him to do what they decide. Integrity is important behavioral trait which a leader should follow.
Mosadeghard (2003) had pointed out different styles of leadership. These styles are: autocratic, bureaucratic, laissez-faire, charismatic, democratic, participative, situational, transactional, and transformational leadership. Aioanei (2006) explained that in autocratic leadership style, organization is highly centralized. Leaders are more concerned with the tasks to be performed rather than developing relations. In this type of leadership employees are less involved and most of the decisions are made by the management.
(Cherry, 2016) Autocratic leaders normally settle on decisions in view of their thoughts, ideas and judgments and rarely acknowledge guidance or advice from followers. Autocratic leadership includes absolute, authoritarian control over a gathering. primary characteristics of autocratic leadership include, practically no contribution from members, group leaders manage all the work method, strategies and procedures, group members are infrequently trusted with choices or important assignments or tasks and lastly leaders settle on the choices and decisions. Autocratic leadership can be advantageous at times but there are additionally many occasions where this style can be problematic.
(Brown 1988: 28). Behaviour within a group: - After collecting experimental evidence, Lewin concluded that groups with a democratic setup were likely to perform better than ones with autocratic
This style of leadership can be advantageous in highly regulated lines of business, and it can be an efficient management style in companies that don 't require much creativity or innovation from employees. Bureaucratic leadership is one of the most prevalent forms of management today. Weber 's Ideal Bureaucracy is characterized by the following: ~Hierarchical Organization ~Delineated Lines Of Authority With Fixed Areas Of Activity ~Action
Bass and Avolio (1993) pointed out that leadership style is based on behavior areas from laissez-fair (no leadership) to participative (take inputs from subordinate but ultimate decision making with the leader) through transactional leadership (which depends on reward system and punishments) to transformational leadership (which is based on inspiration and behavioral charisma) and ultimately Autocratic leadership (absolute power on decision making). The researcher selected above approach since it has been developed recently and efficiently demonstrated through research findings. The various components are further elaborated below; 1. Laissez-fair Style Laissez-fair leaders are characterized as an avoidant leader who may uninvolved with their subordinates. As per Mondy and Premeaux (1995), these leaders let group members to make all decisions.
Teamwork in the workplace gives the company and employees the ability to become more familiar with each other and learn how to work together. Teamwork is also essential to the success of an organisation and to the development of each employee. Understanding teamwork will assist in developing company's policies with regards to teamwork in the workplace. ● Responsibility and Delegation. Teams that work well together have an understanding of each other's strengths and weaknesses.
