Comparison Between Roll Red Roll And The Hunting Ground

Abstract This paper investigates the growing epidemic of campus rape cases through the viewpoints of anthropology, psychology, and sociology, as portrayed in the documentaries “Roll Red Roll” and “The Hunting Ground.” With the use of key theories and concepts from social sciences, including learning theory, psychoanalytic theory, Max Weber, conflict theory, cyclical theory of change, and social paradigm shift, the paper explores the intricacies of the crimes rendered and the societal responses to them. By examining the various factors which contribute to the widespread issue, this research paper aims to provide an analytical understanding of the issue and its implications for individuals and society. Good

Sexual assault is a widespread

In accordance with the Marxist theory, the conflict theory explores how conflict extends beyond the rich and the poor. The issue arises between those with authority, referred to as the "command class," and those without, recognized as the "obey class." Likewise, it also aligns with the common patterns displayed by society’s response to the widespread issue of sexual assault. In the “Hunting Ground” documentary, it reveals the prevalence of rape culture on college campuses, with over 16% of college women falling victim to rape. Consequently, 45% of campuses report zero cases of sexual assault, disregarding the severity of the issue. Additionally, less than 8% of male college students are responsible for over 90% of rapes, yet punishments for perpetrators remain lenient, often resulting in inexpensive fines (ex. $25 - $75 or short suspensions. In relation to that, less than 4% of college students are athletes, yet they account for 19% of campus rapes, highlighting the systemic issues within sports organizations. The lack of accountability or drive to gain justice for victims proves how rape culture has been tolerated or excused by institutional organizations. According to the “Hunting Ground,” 88% of women assaulted on campus do not report, giving one more reason to prove that institutions excuse these cases of rape in a drive to protect their own reputation (Dick, 2015). Conflict theory becomes applicable when examining how certain institutions respond to cases of campus rape. In such instances, the institutions and perpetrators represent the command class, whereas the victims fall under the category of the obey class. The colleges hold the power to dismiss the actions of the perpetrators, giving them the opportunity to continue in practicing the sexually driven behaviors. Victims are commonly shamed, while the perpetrators are excused and sided