ipl-logo

Corporate Social Responsibility: Profit-Oriented Or Socially Responsible?

3408 Words14 Pages

Profit-Oriented or Socially Responsible? 2 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plays a crucial role in organizations and societies. Traditionally, CSR is a management concept that has been implemented by most of the listed companies around the world. CSR is implemented by companies to be responsible for the company’s consequences on the environment and social welfare in their business operations and interactions with their stakeholders (Unido, n.d). In the other words, CSR is a program that benefits both society and business that do not provide immediate financial benefit to the company but environmental change and positive social (Investopedia, …show more content…

From Milton Friedman’s view, maximizing profit is the only focus of any business corporation, so long as it does not violate the state’s laws and the fundamental rules of society. Most firms are disposed to agree the above statement, thinking that business as a whole should not perform social responsibility at a cost of shareholders ('Shareholder value or social responsibility?', 2007). However, the case of ‘Brent Spar’ revealed the failure of corporate social responsibilities, showed that complying with the legislative requirements is insufficient from the view of the …show more content…

Trying to ignore the social responsibilities might stain an organization’s image and reputation. Thus, performing social responsibility is not simply a choice; it is a need of any corporation. In the twenty-first century, businesses are in the bottlenecks where globalization, science and technology advancement and integrated knowledge are taking place in today’s society (Chan, n.d.). To gain a foothold in this economy, image and reputation play an important role to differentiate a company from one another. With good reputation, it helps firms to create competitive advantage in the business environment. Thus, instead of focus on short-term profit maximizing or costs saving, firms should be stakeholder-oriented. A firm which is stakeholder-oriented focuses on the need of their stakeholder such as employees, customers, society and others who have a direct economic link to the firm (Habil, n.d.). Businesses that are socially responsible will avoid actions that may cause detrimental to stakeholders. They have greater concern on stakeholder well –being. A firm that decided to ignore the social issues may results in a loss of strategic opportunities ('Shareholder value or social responsiblity?', 2007). Involved in CSR activities are proven to create good image and reputation for a company. In the long run, it helps a company to increase shareholders’ value and achieve sustainable business

Show More
Related
1495 Words | 6 Pages

In this paper, I am going to discuss and explain my opinions on why company Q is or is not socially responsible. Company Q recently closed a couple of stores in high crime areas. Company Q also started offering very limited health conscious and organic products. The local food bank has contacted Company Q requesting day old food for donations. Company Q has declined the donation request due to possible fraud by its employees and has started throwing the food away.

Read More
382 Words | 2 Pages

In the article Accountants Save the World by Peter Bakker, one of his casual claims is that “to address current economic crises in a systematic way, we must begin to demand a return on social and natural capital as well. ”1 As a result, Bakker felt that shareholders would not recognize a company's' social accomplishments if it is not captured in financial reports. However, it could be that shareholders do not put social capital into financial statements because they believe that the only social responsibility of business is profits, like Milton Friedman. Therefore, demanding a return on social and natural capital would be ineffective if the majority of shareholders agree with Friedman's view.

Read More
126 Words | 1 Pages

The concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is now ubiquitous in corporate values, even as part of company Mission, over the past few decades, and the definition of CSR has also improved over the years. Generally, companies or organizations’ CSR activities are motivated by value orientation, self-focus motivation, and stakeholder drove (as cited in Jong & Meer, 201/.7). However, there is an intricate link between the ultimate goal of the enterprise, the maximization of interests, and the CSR activity. Is CSR activity a market strategy or corporate social responsibility, or both?

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

Target Corporation needs to buy more local and diverse product from an environmentally friendly company and create a standard that adds value to the local communities and environment. In addition, Target Corporation should source products from diverse international community, minority organization, and women run organizations. Target Corporation must diversify its retail products to add more goods that are sporting, a bakery, and household's items as well educational services using partner organizations. Target Corporation needs to identify new third-party strategic alliances through which it delivers goods at the doorsteps, selecting with a non-perishable item and eventually perishable items depending on the locations. Target Corporation

Read More
1640 Words | 7 Pages

CSR is a concept of practice. The CSR information and documentation has also criticism in present year (AASB 2015). The studies has documented that a rise in the demand for the information related to CSR activities of the company. The studies have shown numerous methods for the discloser of CSR activities of the company (ACCC 2015).

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

Introduction Economic dogma states that the main objective of publicly traded firms is profit maximization. In modern times, most companies have been conducting business with that objective in mind. In the process of maximizing profits, irrefutable damage has been inflicted to the environment and also to human capital. Rimanoczy (2015) referring to the maximization of profits expressed, "Focusing on the bottom line as the ultimate priority has had an impact on rising unemployment, social crises, environmental challenges, health impacts, to name a few " (para. 4). Different scholars have proposed several methods to integrate the needs for profits with corporate social responsibility; in this context, John Elkington developed a new approach to measure corporate sustainability denominated the Triple Bottom Line.

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

Additionally, there is growing public awareness and demand for social responsibility, sustainability, and transparency in business operations. Companies that prioritize social and environmental impact, ethical practices, and stakeholder engagement can gain a competitive advantage and enhance their reputation. All these factors contribute to an environment of constant change and uncertainty, which requires businesses to be agile, innovative, and adaptable. Companies must be willing to adopt new technologies and business models, embrace social and environmental values, and respond to shifting market

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

Creating a strong business and building a better world are not conflicting goals they are both essential ingredients for long-term success - Bill Ford. In recent years, customers and employees have demanded corporate social responsibility (CSR) ethics, inclusion and diversity, reflecting that businesses should do more than meet the basic requirements for ethical corporate activities. Modern businesses are increasingly employing these concepts to encourage change for good and make a significant contribution to the world as they begin to acknowledge their environmental and social impact.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

One term that people discuss is corporate social responsibility, especially because many people are starting to recognize that companies can deeply influence our society in many different ways. During this learning journey, we will be discussing companies whose social responsibility actions I admire the most. Furthermore, we will also be discussing which companies I do not trust. Last but not least, I will be stating whether I would like to work in the corporate social responsibility

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

Defined this way, quite a few people are impacted by CSR. The breadth of stakeholders is vast—it includes the company’s shareholders, employees, customers and business partners. They will all be affected by corporate social responsibility defined as operational excellence” (p.1). Traditionally, competitive advantages, are ways for business to stand apart from other competitors. Successful businesses, must be able to deliver a product to a target audience.

Read More
568 Words | 3 Pages

Milton Friedman’s quote on “there is one and only one social responsibility of business---to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits” can actually be seen in different perspectives. Company can also be socially responsible by contributing towards the community through what they do best: excelling in economic terms (Brusseau, 2012). When corporations are making profits, most of it gets sent back into the economy and everyone benefits. Jobs are created, and those that already exist get some added security. More successful corporations mean the increase of the country’s economy, which in turn lead to a social benefit for the society that offers better living conditions.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Since our company established, our company business philosophy: customer-centric, integrity in business world, social responsibility. In order to make the company grow up faster, our company has introduced new decisions every year. Our main social stakeholders include: customer, employees, suppliers and communities. These stakeholders are directly affected by the operations of our company as well as the environment. 3.1 Customer

Read More
1817 Words | 8 Pages

Any firm’s objective is to obtain profits so that it could survive in the market as well as attain maximum shares in the long run. It is up to the firms to decide whether to obtain these profits ethically or by breaking the rules/immorally. As it is written by Friedman in one of his books that “every coin has two sides” (Friedman, 1962:22), which means that a firm could either cause any harm or would it cause any good to the economy while pertaining profits. Even the topic of the essay written by Friedman is trying to tell us that in a free economy all the firms should do is to follow their corporate social responsibility, and never give up to make profits, but is should do so by following the rules of the game or by acting ethically. Corporate Social Responsibility means that how a company addresses and manages its environmental, social, corporate governance and economic impacts and also how such impacts may affect the company’s stakeholders (Noked, 2013).

Read More
412 Words | 2 Pages

According to Sãrãţeanu, the general arguments from an external perspective, lead to the need of using Social Responsibility within the Nonprofit sector, it is important to also examine an argument which makes social responsibility (and, consequently, social reporting) essential for an organizations credibility. Following behind creditability, Reputation is an incentive for the adoption of voluntary Social Responsibility standards based upon the idea of realistic duties towards all stakeholders. This practice would support the idea of a nonprofit organizations not implementing opportunistic behavior, of actions always consistent with the mission, of policies and decisions involving various categories of stakeholders; and would hence increase the reputational capital of the Nonprofit Organization. Even considering all Nonprofit organizations as working for the social system they are part of (without taking into account corruption, or dysfunctions, or mission displacement,

Read More
1155 Words | 5 Pages

Davis (as cited by Khalidah, Zulkufly, & Lau, 2014) defined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as “… the firm’s consideration of, and response to, issues beyond the narrow economic, technical, and legal requirements of the firm. It is the firm’s obligation to evaluate in its decision-making processes the effects of its decisions on the external social system in a manner that will accomplish social benefits along with the traditional economic gains, which the firm seeks. It means that social responsibility begins where the law ends. A firm is not being socially responsible if it merely complies with the minimum requirements of the law, because this is what any good citizen would do.” A firm will not survive without the support of both the stakeholders and shareholders, thus the CSR proposes the indication which stats that a firm can never exist In a vacuum (Khalidah et.

Read More

More about Corporate Social Responsibility: Profit-Oriented Or Socially Responsible?

Open Document