ipl-logo

Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

889 Words4 Pages

This study examined how animal testing is cruel, inhumane, and harmful to animals. Experimenting or testing on animals is not only wasteful and unethical, but it is proven to be bad science too (PETA, 2017). The study also proves how many of the animals are dying because of animal testing and there are other alternatives in addition to animal testing. Many of the studies have discovered that animals are no different than humans are. Studies show company demands for animal testing free products are increasing. “If scientists start using alternatives like computer models, or biochemical/cell based systems the animal testing deaths will decrease” (NIH, 2016). If animal testing products start to decrease, the increase for animal testing free products will not be as high as it is now. Many scientists believe that animal testing is a huge contribution to society, but it is often inhumane …show more content…

“94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials” (Procon, 2004). Trials show how humans and animals react the same way. “Based on the traditional assumption that animals respond the same way that humans do when exposed to certain products, unknown numbers of animals, mostly rabbits, mice, and rats, are subject to tests that assess the safety of cosmetic, personal care, household products, chemicals, medical devices, and their component ingredients” (AAVS, 2017). With humans and animals being exposed to certain products, animals are only being wasted, knowing the reaction will be same on the animal as it is on a human. “The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings” (Procon, 2004). Since animals and humans are so alike, they are not good to be tested or experimented on because they react the same exact way. Testing on animals is just like testing on

Show More
Related
800 Words | 4 Pages

The Humane Society International stated, “Some animal tests take months or years to conduct and analyze (e.g., 4-5 years, in the case of rodent cancer studies), at a cost of hundreds of thousands—and sometimes millions—of dollars per substance examined (e.g., $2 to $4 million per two-species lifetime cancer study).” The New England Anti-Vivisection Society also stated, “The traditional testing of chemicals using animals can take up to five years per substance and cost millions of dollars, while non-animal alternatives can test hundreds of chemicals in a week for a fraction of the cost.” Scientists waste millions of dollars on animal studies that are not relevant to humans. There are alternative, cheaper methods that can benefit human research more than animal testing can and further the advancement of science and medicine in months instead of years. By using animals for research, scientists are putting America’s money and animals at

Read More
725 Words | 3 Pages

Over 100 million animals are used as test subjects in the world, with approximately 26 million of them in the United States. Sadly, a majority of the time the products that are being tested on animals are not even effective once human trials begin. Consumers might object that if the products were tested to be safe on animals then they would be safe for humans. Yet, 92% of the times the products actually work in animal trials they are later deemed too dangerous or uneffective for people. Which means that most of the animals used in scientific testing are being abused for no apparent reason.

Read More
625 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing costs a large amount of money, as the animals must be fed, housed and treated with various kinds of drugs. Based on the National Institutes of Health (NIH)’s 2014 budget in the United States, more than $12 billion was spent to support animal experiments. Five hundred thousand and 1.7 million dollar were used to experiment on dogs and monkeys, respectively. However, non-animal testing is generally more reliable, less costly and more humane than animal-based tests. Technology and innovation have taken medical research way pass the point where animal testing is the only alternative.

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Over 100 million animals are tested on every year. Animal testing for human benefit is inhumane and must be stopped. Whether they are being crippled, burned, poisoned, and abused it is still happening in U.S. labs everywhere. Animal testing is an unjust way of finding cures for illness and beauty products. These creatures have no say, and can not do anything about what they are going through.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

Alone in the United States, a calculated seventy million animals are murdered for “scientific benefit” in the hands of household products, government agencies, cosmetics companies, scientific centers, and educational institutions. Although it may appear to be beneficial to test on animals it is actually hurting the innocent animals population in large numbers, and at a rapid pace. Innocent animals are being harmed and killed for the benefit of a human's safety. Most people claim animal testing is the correct choice while others oppose it, as it is improper and unlawful. Although some people think the good outweighs the negative, the harm being caused to these animals cannot be undone.

Read More
248 Words | 1 Pages

We shouldn’t test products on animals because it’s cruel, it can affect the environment, and affects humans. Did you know that every year over a hundred million animals of all kinds are killed? We shouldn’t test on animals because it’s cruel. Animals are being shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, and addicted to drugs and much more without painkillers.

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

There are over 26 million animals being used for scientific and commercial testing each year in the United States. Animals are being used for developing medical treatments, checking the safety of a product, and seeing the toxicity of medication before human use. Animal testing has contributed to many life saving medications, however animal testing is inhumane and cruel. Animals used in testing are put in experiments where there is force feeding, food and water deprivation, the infliction of wounds, physical restraint, decapitation, and many other inhumane acts. Alternative testing methods now exist that can replace the use of animals being used for scientific and commercial testing.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

One of the main arguments used by activists are that results from animal testing is not successful in clinical trials with humans. While it is physically impossible to replicate a human organ or disease with an animal, you can get an extremely good representation. This will get you accurate results that will provide much more success to the testing compared to something that isn’t a close depiction – like a computer. Animal research continuing shows that even though the price is extremely high, there is no “replacement” method that comes close to the precision from use of animals. The second fact is that animal research alternatives MUST be used whenever possible.

Read More
1787 Words | 8 Pages

A decrease in animal testing will not only help animals, but it will help science. Although some say that scientific experimentation is not a cruel endeavor (using reasons such as proper handling, maintaining the health of the animal, and the replication of the animals’ natural environments being taught to students in order to preserve uncontaminated results), animals still die by the millions unnecessarily each year (“Ratting” 2). Ending all animal testing immediately is highly irrational and improbable. There is already a gradual decrease in animal experimentation, but humanity has to decrease animal testing at a higher rate, removing all unnecessary forms of experimentation by using alternatives, and eventually,

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

There are other ways we could experiment, like computer models. However, there are many benefits from using animals, because animals give us real life results (Chang, 2). Computer models can help us but not in a way the hands on animal testing helps us. We gain hand on knowledge and experiments with animals that benefit humans and animals (Chang, 2). What animal research protesters don’t know is that there are over 350 human disease that have an animal counterpart.

Read More
554 Words | 3 Pages

Animal experimentation is unreliable, as animals are very different from humans, and it is highly abusive. Animals have been scientific test subjects since ancient times of Rome and Greeks. Animal testing has proved to be inhumane, unreliable, harmful to humans, and deadly to all. Animal testing is very ineffective because of the lack of similarities animals share with humans. “Animal data is so unreliable, that for decades, the tobacco industry used it to prove that nicotine is not harmful.

Read More
1259 Words | 6 Pages

According to Humane Society International, the definition of animal testing is “the procedure performed on living animals for purposes of research.” These procedures can be used to analyze the effects of medicine, check the safety of products used daily by humans, or build an understanding of biology and disease. When one reviews all of the scientific research regarding animal cruelty, it is clear to see that the negative aspects of animal testing far outway the benefits that could come from it. This is proven through explanation of the historical context of this issue, statistics involving it, and alternatives that could be used in an effort to end animal testing. Before one can begin to argue the point that testing negatively affects animals,

Read More
1449 Words | 6 Pages

Each year, more than 100 million animals are killed or experimented on by scientists. Experimenting on animals not only affects the animal, but humans as well. While testing is important for finding cures for many different diseases, the amount of living organisms killed during experiments is avoidable. Animal testing is a world-wide issue, and serious measures must be placed by removing all animals from a laboratory setting and banning testing throughout the United States. Using animals to test the safety of products is used throughout the whole world.

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year. Animal testing is a cruel and inhumane way to obtain research and knowledge. Animals can be very different from humans leaving researchers with poor test results. Animal experimentation is no longer necessary for research because of the abundance of solutions and alternatives to solve this issue and keep animals away from harm. For years, many people have been trying to control the amount of animal experimentation that's going on in society and its finally starting to pay off.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

Without animal testing, not only would people with diseases suffer, but the entire world could suffer, proving the presented point that the benefits of animal testing outweigh the drawbacks. Although opponents argue that the drawbacks of animal testing outweigh the benefits because animal testing is cruel, in actuality, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks because it saves human lives and is an affordable

Read More

More about Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document