ipl-logo

Essay On Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

485 Words2 Pages

Imagine you’re a high school senior who is one of the top recruits in the country, you have two offers on the table. One from a university that guarantees a high compensation, the other from a university that doesn't have a wealthy athletic department. Now imagine that they are both equal on the athletic field, It would be hard for you to chose the offer from the university that doesn't have a wealthy athletic department. This is what will happen to colleges if we pay college athletes, it will wash away traditions, that we hold very dear. For example “the camaraderie of game day, the tailgating, the atmosphere of a stadium packed with nearly 100,000 fans and the pride of cheering for a university team -- are at stake.” - NCAA President Mark Emmert. Paying college athlete would mean losing what most college sports fan love, the high level of competition.

Another question you have to ask is were is the money going to come from, as most colleges already lose money on sports. Then if you have to pay the athletes It will make colleges go into bidding wars with each other, you will see less competition and smaller colleges will have to cut out “unnecessary sports”. The NCAA released data showing that only 14 programs are turning a profit, under Title IX colleges can not just pay male basketball players and not female ones as well. …show more content…

because it's college sports, with college athletes,” The NCAA will have to get rid of its amateur model, that was made by the founding fathers who said it was the best model for their academic mission. The key word their is academic.Horace Mitchell says “Collegiate sports is not a career or profession. It is the students' vehicle to a higher education degree.” If the NCAA pays collegiate athletes is this still true? Sports is a small part of the college experience, college is about obtaining a higher education. Fr. John Jenkins says “Our relationship to these young people is to educate them, to help them

Show More
Related
893 Words | 4 Pages

In their journal “The Case of Paying College Athletes”, John Siegfried and Allen Sanderson point out many discrepancies in NCAA policies, but do not support monetary payment. They argue: “College athletes are in fact currently paid, in the sense that the majority receive grants-in-aid that cover most – although not all – of their college expenses.” (Pg. 127). After this statement, the authors detail the demanding payments varying depending on each college

Read More
2095 Words | 9 Pages

Jackson explains that there just is not a fair way for every single college to divide up payments for every single football and basketball player, because then the better athletes on the team will be asking for more while the bench players will think it’s unfair. “Changing our mindset doesn’t solve the problem or lessen the intensity of the debate….But a small reality check in thought as least would give us a new starting point to change the discussion” (Jackson 1). Jackson isn’t trying to argue, he is here to get it into the people’s heads that it just is not possible to pay collegiate athletes. The system of payment to an athlete is an obstacle that the NCAA will have to overcome before they start to divvy out profits from the schools to the

Read More
1107 Words | 5 Pages

The NCAA puts its money where its mission is, equipping student-athletes to succeed on the playing field, in the classroom, and throughout life. They aren’t trying to make it so their athletes can live from an income from their sport during college. They are trying to prepare them for the future and help them succeed. In the article “Should NCAA rules be changed to allow intercollegiate athletes to be paid a salary for participating in sports?” (Handy)

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

College sports are a major part of American culture. College athletes devote hours upon hours a week to their sports training, but unfortunately, sports can take up a lot of time and distract from other important activities. This can harm academics, as athletes have to balance sports and academics, especially at a college. Participating in sports is almost like working a part-time job and having to balance school too which can be difficult to do, and focus may be rendered on one task and not both. Furthermore, athletes will be on scholarships too, which is why college athletes should not be paid.

Read More
1895 Words | 8 Pages

They reason that paying college athletes would make a mockery of their education, meaning the athletes would only focus on sports and not on schoolwork. Academic work, however, is already secondary for most collegiate athletes (Gregory). In addition, one should think twice about even considering these athletes to be amateurs. Generally, players and coaches in amateur sports are unpaid or the coach is paid modestly. With college coaches’ paychecks amounting to over a million dollars in some cases, it is obvious that this “modest pay” does not apply to college athletics.

Read More
1339 Words | 6 Pages

Jack Evans S. Blount Assignment 4 - Argumentative Research Paper – Final Draft May 4, 2023 Should college athletes be paid? American intercollegiate athletics are deeply engrained into the college culture and are beloved by students and spectators alike. Collegiate national championships are just a few examples of athletic events that draw in thousands of spectators, millions of televised viewers and over a billion dollars annually for universities across the country. The business of collegiate athletics is enormous.

Read More
1453 Words | 6 Pages

Rodney D. Fort explains that: Many people have an aversion to paying college athletes for their services, but an examination of various principles of economics show that paying athletes makes sense and would make the college sports system more efficient in the way it distributes money. Players would receive more of the revenues they produce while pay would be cut for administrators and other employees in the athletic departments. (Fort 10) Many sports followers wonder where the money would come from if athletes would get paid. They think college athletic departments barely break even but their is some confusion. Fort stated, “Universities allow athletic departments to keep all excess revenues on an updated basis during any given budget period.

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

While the NCAA constantly affirms its commitment to its root values, it is simultaneously brokering deals with national networks to show live football games to millions of people”(Listland). If college athletes were to get paid, it would only make the sport more competitive. College athletes should be getting paid because they would work harder, they would have money for necessities, and they would not have to worry about getting a job. There is already a significant financial agreement to student athletes, the Ohio State athletic director Gene Smith said that he has always promoted cost of attendance because there is a specific part of their student athlete population that [does] not have enough money to spend. The fairness of the attendance, guilt and wariness over more courtroom fights.

Read More
1124 Words | 5 Pages

While this is true, most college athletes try their best to get to the professional level, not all college athletes make it to the next level. Those that know that their chances in playing professionally are not high might not be inclined to always put forth maximum effort. A little extra incentive in the form of compensation would encourage maximum effort from all athletes all the time. Paying these athletes can only increase the effort, and therefore competition, in their respective

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

Paying college athletes would not be beneficial at all for the players, programs, and schools. College athletics is one of the most exciting sport spectacles in the country. According to businessinsider.com, 231 NCAA division 1 schools brought in 9.15 billion dollars in revenue in 2015. It is obvious that college sports are extremely popular. But they are not popular because of the handful of stars in the whole NCAA.

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

NCAA data, however, indicated that only 20 of the 126 football bowl subdivisions universities earned an operating surplus on intercollegiate athletics in 2013 (Fulks 2014, p. 13) only a portion of those profits made it to the academic side of the schools. The problem isn’t whether college athletes should be paid, mostly all of the athletes receive grants or some type of aid that covers almost every college expense while at the institution. The NCAA policy compensates athletes for such thinks as room, broad, tuition, books and other fees. (“The Case for Paying College Athletes.”) its is likely that paying college athletes would shift the power from schools that made lower income with there sports teams, to more high-power schools such as Duke university or Alabama. This in fact would shift the dynamic of college institutions from the many that are out there with teams and probably make them equal to the number of professional teams (NBA 32 teams)

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

College is a great place for students to gain knowledge but most importantly athletes play the game love and have so much passion for it, while the people behind the scenes are filling their pockets with greed. These athletes sweat day and night to be the best as whole an individually, to be on top and what every other athlete wants a chance to win a National Championship. In the student’s eyes they see a championship. The mind of a business person all they see is a money making opportunity. Paying college athletes would solve the issue along down the road when they become a pro and sign for a five year fifty million dollar contract that somebody will not come knocking on their door because they were making under the table money in college.

Read More
1827 Words | 8 Pages

The NCAA is a nonprofit organization. Students are not professionals which most people need to know. Paying college athletes to play would ruin college sports. Another thing is there is not a fair way to pay college athletes. Paying students athletes will cause cuts elsewhere in the athletic department.

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

A current contentious issue it the dilemma of whether or not to pay student-athletes. On one side of the argument are those who believe that a fiscal compensation of more than a basic living expenses scholarship would corrupt college athletics. On the other side it the believe that athletes who generate millions of dollars should be fairly compensated for their talents and risk their bodies take. What is just as interesting as these opposing sides is the way the movement is slowly occurring. Since the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) was established in 1906 is has held firm on the rule that all participants must keep their armature status.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

A growing debate in the National Collegiate Athletic Association is whether or not student athletes should be paid. The controversy began in 2011 after three hundred coaches and athletes signed a petition to pay college-level athletes, and since then other athletes have made several more arguments. The NCAA has rightfully denied all of the requests, saying they include too much. To pay student athletes could be hugely expensive for colleges, especially because they would not only pay for each athlete’s degree and equipment, but also provide a salary and give bonuses revenue for tournaments. Moreover, college athletes should not be paid because there is not enough money, it takes away a student’s focus from schoolwork, and not every athlete is guaranteed a professional career after graduating; however it is argued that it they are already paid in a way.

Read More

More about Essay On Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Related Topics

Open Document