ipl-logo

Mr Adams Trial Essay

733 Words3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: Have you ever dealt with a tragic murder case like this? The overall question is whether Mr. Bennet is guilty or not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams. Mr. Bennet is not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams because there is not enough evidence to prove it. Although the prosecution claims that Mr. Bennet was guilty, a reasonable doubt exists. Even though the prosecution believes that Mr. Bennet was guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams, they were incorrect. Instead, we have reason to believe that Mr. Mack was actually the one guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams. The strongest piece of evidence in this case that points toward the fact that Mr. Bennet is not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams is that Mr. Mack was very jealous of Mr. Adams because he had bidded higher and bought the …show more content…

Bennet should not be found guilty for the murder of Mr. Adams, and Mr. Mack should be the one found guilty, is because some witnesses saw Mr. Mack hanging around Mr. Adams all evening, specifically when Mr. Adams had his coffee. The fact that Mr. Mack was hanging around Mr. Adams coffee most of the evening is really important to know. This is because Mr. Adams had been killed by rat poison in his coffee that evening. Mr. Mack claims that he had just been hanging around Mr. Adams all night because they were “friends”, even though Mr. Mack shows hatred for Mr. Adams. Most likely at some point throughout the evening when Mr. Mack was hanging around Mr. Adams, he could have easily snuck some rat poison into Mr. Adams drink. Like I said when police were interviewing Mr. Mack, he had explained that the only reason why he was hanging around Mr. Adams was because they were “friends.” This was most likely a lie because witnesses had told the police that Mr. Mack had strong hatred for Mr. Adams. This is another reason why Mr. Bennet should not be found guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams, and the one who should be found guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams is Mr.

Show More
Related

Raleigh Heck Tate Opening Statement

714 Words | 3 Pages

A second thing the defense might claim would be that Sheriff Heck Tate only meant to cause less harm to more people by claiming Bob Ewell had killed himself, without thorough investigation. The truth is, moreover, if Bob Ewell did not kill himself, then there is someone dangerous still lurking in the shadows of Maycomb County. A third thing the defense may say would be that there was no possible way to figure out who had killed Bob Ewell, due to the lack of light

Read More

Steve Is NOT Responsible For Mr. Nesbitt's Murder

349 Words | 2 Pages

Many people today get involved with the wrong people, as a result, many people are wrongly accused and incarcerated for crimes they didn’t commit. In the book MONSTER, there is a witness named Steve, who is on trial for the murder of a drugstore owner. Steve was the lookout in the robbery, however, he was not responsible for Mr. Nesbitt’s death. First of all, Steve was the lookout because he planned the robbery with James King.

Read More

Mr. Eldridge's Guilty: Case Study

443 Words | 2 Pages

In this paper I will show the evidence as to why Mr. Eldridge should be found guilty. One reason that he should be found guilty is because he had hate towards Mr. Eldridge. Another reason is he was spotted at the crime scene in the 2hr period that the murder took place. Another reason that he is guilty is because the murder weapon was found in his house with blood on it. One final reason that Mr. Eldridge is guilty is because he could have been paid by Barbra Wheeler to steal the recipe and killed Mr. Arms when he got caught.

Read More

Mr. Bennett Case Essay

567 Words | 3 Pages

Heidi Mattoon 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Mr. Bennett should be found not guilty of murder because there is reasonable doubt. Although the prosecution claims he is guilty, they are incorrect because Mr. Alfaro was pouring a cup of coffee before Mr. Adams came in, Mr. Adams had trouble with his eyesight so he could have accidentally put rat poison in instead of sugar, and Mr. Bennett touched the coffee when he went to get Mr. Adams pulse.

Read More

How Should David Eldrige Be Found Guilty

339 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever considered how people get away with things, like stealing and theft? Most have, and they still wonder just how. David Eldrige had all the right materials to murder Mr. Armes. His fingerprints were also found at the crime scene. This is why David Eldrige should be found guilty.

Read More

Mr Adams Research Paper

473 Words | 2 Pages

Mr. Bennett should not be found guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams because reasonable doubt exists. Although the prosecution claims he was guilty, they are incorrect because when he found Mr. Adams died he immediately checked for a pulse and didn't find one after checking. Mr. Bennett's fingerprints were not found on the coffee cup that was used for his coffee. The strongest piece of evidence is that Mr. Alfaro’s prints were also found on the coffee mug. The rat poison found in the cupboard was only available to exterminators.

Read More

Summary Of Walter Dean Myers 'Monster'

768 Words | 4 Pages

If you believe, as I do, that their positions, their stated characters, so taint their testimony that everything they say is well within the area of reasonable doubt.” Hence, Briggs breaks down the whole trial into which testimonies are viable. Only one was reasonable, and it was the witness testimony of Miss Henry. Miss Henry was in the store to get medicine for her granddaughter, but she picked James King out of a handful of photographs—not even fifty or a thousand pictures. Briggs inferred that she, Miss Henry, was partially coerced to pick the man looking most similar in countenance to King out of little to no photographs.

Read More

Who Is Mr Bennett Guilty?

455 Words | 2 Pages

Mr Bennett should be found not guilty of first degree murder of Mr Adams because there is not enough proven evidence to make him guilty. Even though the prosecution claims that Mr Bennett is guilty of murder, they are incorrect because the rat poison that was used to kill Mr Adams was only available to the exterminators, and Mr Adams had bad eyesight and was terrible at reading labels. He was going to put more creamer and sugar into his coffee, which was where the poison was. This evidence was proven by the police officer, Mrs Swanson.

Read More

Adam Armstrong Opening Statement

741 Words | 3 Pages

I believe the defendant's absence of sympathy for other people and unwillingness to understand and empathize with people who are different from him led to him unconsciously setting up the circumstances for his brother to be killed. I believe that this makes him a danger to others. So, jury as you make your decision on whether or not the defendant is guilty I ask that you all seriously analyze the behaviors of Adam Armstrong and realize that they are not normal and that he needs serious help. Thank

Read More

Death Of Bob Shelton In The Outsiders

350 Words | 2 Pages

My the reasons that Johnny is not guilty of murder are, Ponyboy was being drowned by the Socs and if Johnny did not stab Bob then the Socs would have killed Ponyboy. Johnny defended Ponyboy. The socs had a blade and were gonna beat Johnny up. My first claim is, Ponyboy was being drowned by the Socs and if Johnny did not stab Bob then the Socs would have killed Ponyboy. ¨They were drowning you, Pony.

Read More

Mr. Bennett's Case

471 Words | 2 Pages

Bennett not committed this crime, he shouldn’t have had any rat poison on his hands, but he did, and was the only suspect who did. This shows that it couldn’t have been Mrs. Reed since she wasn’t there and had no traces of what was used to kill Mr. Adams on her belongings or hands. Mr. Bennett is guilty since he was the only one who had rat poison on his hands while not being the exterminator. Another reason why Mr. Bennett should be found guilty is because he had means, motive, and opportunity. Mr. Adams was nagging Mr. Bennett to pay off his debt, and the only way to do that was to sell his home, which had been in his family for 5 generations, so it was surely important.

Read More

Mr Stanley Is Not Guilty Of The Trial

458 Words | 2 Pages

Dear Jury Members: Mr. Bennett should be seen as not guilty of the crime of murdering Mr. Adams because there is reasonable doubt. The prosecution claims he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but this is not true because Mr. Bennett found Mr. Adams' dead body outside, however. Mr. Bennett never went outside during the party; he also was the one to check the pulse of Mr. Adams, which would explain why he had the poison in his hand. Mr. Bennett also had gloves. He would have worn them if he had murdered Mr. Adams.

Read More

Cullen Davis Jury Essay

893 Words | 4 Pages

On November 9, 1979, they were ready to give the verdict. The courtroom was silent as the foreman stood to announce the verdict. Cullen Davis, the richest man ever to be tried for murder was found NOT GUILTY…again. Everyone was shocked. The prosecutors were flabbergasted.

Read More

Mr Bennet Should Not Be Found Guilty

343 Words | 2 Pages

Mr. Bennet should not be found guilty because there is beyond reasoning that Mr. Bennet did not kill Mr. Armes. Although the prosecution thinks he's guilty, the evidence shows that he's not. For example, one reason why he's not guilty is that it could have been the exterminator because he came over the same day Mr. Armes died and he could've put the rat poison in his coffee. The strongest piece of evidence in this case is that the spilled coffee had rat poisoning in it. Mr. Bennet should not be found guilty of the crime of Mr. Armes' death because reasonable doubt exists.

Read More

Knapp V State Summary

442 Words | 2 Pages

The fact that the story Knapp claims he heard about the victim is not true tends to disapprove Knapp’s claim that he actually heard the story, which in turn tends to disprove his claim of self-defense. Here, Knapp correctly asserted that the real issue was whether or not Knapp had heard the deputy caused the death of the old man. In spite of Knapp’s claim that the deputy has killed the old man while arresting him, Knapp could not identify the person who told him the story. Here, the prosecutor asserted that there must be someone who is not telling the truth and also the defendant could not identify the person whom he heard the story from. Even though, the prosecutor could not show what Knapp had, or had not, heard, the prosecutor showed that the deputy did not killed the old man by submitting evidence because the elderly man had actually died of senility and alcoholism.

Read More

More about Mr Adams Trial Essay

Open Document