ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

795 Words4 Pages

Imagine that you are locked inside a small room without any control of your life. You are told on what to eat, how you spend your time, and when to reproduce. You are told to try new experiments on yourself or when you are going to die. Using animals in research to test products or medicine is a topic brought to the public’s attention. While some may think that animals should have their own right to live, others do not care for the suffering and pain the animals go through to get a result for a test. Animals shouldn’t be used for researching the safety of products or medicine.
The pain and suffering that animals experience when locked up to take tests for medicine is not worth the possible benefits for humans. Animals feel and express pain the same way humans do; by screaming and …show more content…

In a public opinion on the morality of medical testing on animals in May 2006 shows that 61% of the public believes it is morally acceptable, 7% believes it depends on the situation, and only 32% think that is is morally wrong. (Public Opinion on Mortality) The fact is that we already do test new drugs on people. No matter how many animal tests are undertaken, someone will always be the first human to be tested on. Because animal tests are so unreliable, they make those human trials all the more risky. (Animal Testing par. 6) Sheila Silcock, a research consultant for the RSPCA, states: "Animals may themselves be the beneficiaries of animal experiments. But the value we place on the quality of their lives is determined by their perceived value to humans". While animal testing may produce positive results, the same product or drug may not have similar result, causing different side effects for different species. Making human’s lives better should not be a justification for harming and torturing animals. We should see animals with the same value we have for other human

Show More
Related
1585 Words | 7 Pages

Yet, animal’s rights are violated when they are used in research because they are not given a choice (“Save the Animals”)”. 3. Scientists still continue animal experimentation because they believe animals have no dignity and should simply be seen as objects in order to improve the life cycle. III. Inside laboratories, animals suffer too much and are continued to be treated inhumane.

Read More
1188 Words | 5 Pages

The ethics revolving around animal rights and animal testing are highly controversial. A large scale of people in the United States say that animals deserve some protection from misuse, while other Americans argue animals are worthy of the same rights as humans. However, a quarter of Americans object banning medical research, which results from animal testing. A clear majority of people if they were tied up or injected with substances into the bloodstream or inhalation and force-feeding would lean towards declining the studies. As for animals, we are their voice and give them no option but to be tested on and when finished it either results in death or sold to another laboratory.

Read More
1475 Words | 6 Pages

Animal testing is a extremely controversial topic due to the fact that it deals with many issues such as morality. Animal testing is aimed to help the advancement of wellness and health of people but at the same time harms other creatures. People who are in favor of animal experimenting usually support the scientific research and medical progress part of the issue, while others find it to be inhumane. But, in this debate there are also people who fall in the middle. They care about animals and don’t like the part of hurting them, but know that due to this type of testing there have been and continue to be many important advancements for the human race.

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

The only thing is, we already do tests on people. No matter how many tests they use on animals, there will always be that first person to take the drug. The people who sign up to take the drug in clinical trials are testing for side effects in humans. The side effects can be just as dangerous as making a drug and not testing it first before giving it to someone. Scientists even argue that even if they quit testing on animals they would still have to use a living organism to test the side effects.

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

The ethics debate surrounding medical research that utilizes animal testing is a divisive topic, which is not mediated by the current perception of animal testing. The idea that animals are mistreated and neglected in laboratory facilities is an antiquated perception which is not reflective of the current, highly regulated practice in modern medical research. Medical research on animals should not be forbidden by law because it is already highly regulated for the protection of animals, there are currently no adequate alternatives, and the practice has been essential to the development of numerous life-saving treatments. Medical research on animals is a highly regulated practice. The Animal Welfare Act not only sets guidelines on how animals can be procured, but also their housing conditions, and stipulates regular veterinary examinations for all test subjects (USDA).

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

For many years, animal research has been performed on all types of animals in order to find drug development, cosmetic manufacturing, household products, food additives, pesticides, medical and scientific cures. Animals undergo many cruel and unethical tests without pain medicine, in order to achieve these findings. There are very negligible laws put into place to protect certain animals, while others are not protected at all. The purpose of this paper is to educate the readers on the pain and suffering an animal goes through while being tested, in order to benefit human society. I hope my research will persuade the reader to help stop animal research by speaking out on behalf of the animal and joining a support group that will fight against animal cruelty and fight for stricter laws that protects the animal.

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

Testing on animals Testing on animals for human gain has been going on for centuries, and the process is not any more caring now than it was 100 years ago. Animals are treated poorly, and then more often than not they are destroyed. There are more humane ways for this testing to be done, and it needs to be implemented immediately. “How can painfully and artificially inducing human diseases in other species with a different genetic make-up to our own possibly advance the cause of modern medicine?” (Howe) New studies have been performed proving that mice are more genetically different from humans than we once thought.

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

“We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.” (Immanuel Kant) Animals, ranging from the horse fly to the mouse, are used in laboratory experiments and scientific research all over the world and are often subject to poor treatment. They are critically used for research to learn more about the human body without harming the human being itself. Although many people might argue testing on animals puts them at risk, how many human and animal lives have actually been protected as a result of animal testing? Animals should continue to be used in scientific experiments to not only lower human suffering but also animal suffering [1].

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

People against animal testing say that their is an alternative to animal testing, and according Dolgin, alternatives are coming alive in the U.S. In the UK there has been, “broad push to develop alternative means for assessing the potential hazards of drugs” (Dolgin). Backing this source of information up, that their is really a push towards a change, another article states the same thing saying that the UK government, “cut the number of animals used in scientific research...” (“Animal Testing”). The reason that people want to get rid of animal testing is to “refine and reduce” the number of animals used during testing erging, scientist to find different ways to test on animals (“Animal Testing”).

Read More
550 Words | 3 Pages

90% of drugs fail during human trials, even though there were promising results in animal testing. Using animals for testing to see if it’s safe for humans gives little data useful for analysis. Studies have shown that drug tests on monkeys are just as useless as those used on other species in showing how human will react to the drug even though it is the closest animal that resembles humans. All animals should be protected from inhumane testing of products that benefit humans because their is alternative testing methods now exist that can take the place of animals, The cells and structure of animals is different from humans because of this they are poor test subjects, when animals are used for testing afterwards they are almost always killed.

Read More
757 Words | 4 Pages

These tests are rewarding to society but “the pain and suffering that experimental animals are subjects to is not worth any possible benefit to humans”(Source 1, paragraph 3). Testing on animals can be

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

Despite the surprising numbers, the only one law that regulates animal researches is Animal Welfare Act. But how ludicrous this law is that cannot restrict the types of experiments scientists perform. Not only is animal testing have unreasonably loose law enforcement, the abuses faced by the animals in the experiment procedures are also unimaginably cruel and horrified. The animals are confined and isolated in a barren cage with all rights being deprived. Breathing in toxic fumes, implanting electrodes to the brain, repeatedly breeding, exposing to radiation and testing various drugs to infecting diseases are just a few items on the list that they have to face.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

In this article, it stated that research agencies had ordered UK scientists to improve the way they use animals in experiments. Too often poorly designed projects – to test new medicines for strokes, cancer, and other conditions – have produced meaningless results and wasted animals’ lives. Is it really worth blinding a monkey to have new eyeliner? It is incredibly cruel that these animals are left in cages for the rest of their lives and are only let out when they are being tested and sometimes they are put down after they have been testing on or put back into their cages. It is unethical.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Mahatma Gandhi once stated, “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” In today’s world, animals are being used to control scientific variables in experiments including drug testing, the creation of cosmetics, and treatments for diseases. Animal testing can be beneficial in the aspect that it has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. However, on the other hand, animal testing can be seen as cruel and inhumane because of the way animals are treated. Animal testing is more complicated in the aspect that it is not just simply putting the end product on the animals, but torturing the defenseless animals with relentless experiments causing an unknown amount of pain.

Read More
1411 Words | 6 Pages

review of relevant ethical issues, including the choice of ethical theory A significant aspect to consider when discussing the issue of animal experimentation focuses on people’s views of animals. Mostly everyone would agree that animals are entitled to respect, which is why it is unethical to mistreat pets or aimlessly hurts animals. The question is, how much respect are they owed and what rights, if any, do they have? How much should they be allowed to suffer in research?

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document