Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

The practice of incorporating animals as an aid to medical science and human understanding is a practice that has been sustained throughout centuries, but it was not until Charles Darwin's theory of evolution that triggered the belief that animals can be used as models for the biological benefits for humans. Venturing into animal experimentation may be beneficial towards the flourishing of the medical field and potentially humanity itself, though it contains several ethical and medical flaws in which it can only be momentarily supervised with certain inadequate restrictions. Animal-rights activists differ from “animal welfarists” because they are entirely opposed to the usage of animals (sometimes mice) for experimentation

This lack of explicitness may provoke the safety of both humans and animals, and inferring a drug will be successful on humans because of its progress in animals is a bit skeptical. In fact, most drugs that prospered on animals do not function for humans and it furthermore makes it apparent these animals were abused for no satisfactory reason. Neglecting possible cures and treatments because of failed animal experiments is another flaw that contradicts the whole point of conducting the research in the first place. Possible cures for diseases may operate within humans but scientist’s stern views causes them to resort to ignorance that can look upon those opportunistic inferences. Limiting possible cures based on animal research is not thinking innovatively, which can forcibly direct research strictly on animals in the future which can also negatively affect other types of research that may in reality result in success, but are scorned for not using similar subjects and practices. Conducting explicit and strict research on only animals and not making an effort to find more precise alternatives is simply narrow-minded. Discovering more accurate alternatives will advance the time it takes to achieve the goals of conducted

The NIH alone spends 14 billion dollars annually on animal research, rather than spending that money on public health. Breakthrough technology has already created more efficient and cheaper alternatives. These alternatives consist of mechanisms like "organs on a chip" and artificial human tissues which are exponentially more reliable due to its much closer resemblance to human structure and physiology. These human skin cells and artificial human organisms make it a possibility to conduct research based on human genetics, meanwhile not trying to compare an entire diverse species of animal results with complex human anatomy. These artificial organs makes it beneficial to test potential drug candidates that may provide crucial information on its safety measures (Wyss Institute). Moreover, acquiring these alternatives eliminates the reason to test on animals for humanity's sake because there is now an advanced and harmless way to conduct research on rigid medical science. Humanity now has the opportunity to engage into a new innovative way to conduct research on reliable subjects that may emphasize treatments more rapidly than the time consuming animal testing. This new concept can even benefit the animals as compensation for their crucial contributions to the medical