ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

982 Words4 Pages

The practice of incorporating animals as an aid to medical science and human understanding is a practice that has been sustained throughout centuries, but it was not until Charles Darwin's theory of evolution that triggered the belief that animals can be used as models for the biological benefits for humans. Venturing into animal experimentation may be beneficial towards the flourishing of the medical field and potentially humanity itself, though it contains several ethical and medical flaws in which it can only be momentarily supervised with certain inadequate restrictions. Animal-rights activists differ from “animal welfarists” because they are entirely opposed to the usage of animals (sometimes mice) for experimentation …show more content…

This lack of explicitness may provoke the safety of both humans and animals, and inferring a drug will be successful on humans because of its progress in animals is a bit skeptical. In fact, most drugs that prospered on animals do not function for humans and it furthermore makes it apparent these animals were abused for no satisfactory reason. Neglecting possible cures and treatments because of failed animal experiments is another flaw that contradicts the whole point of conducting the research in the first place. Possible cures for diseases may operate within humans but scientist’s stern views causes them to resort to ignorance that can look upon those opportunistic inferences. Limiting possible cures based on animal research is not thinking innovatively, which can forcibly direct research strictly on animals in the future which can also negatively affect other types of research that may in reality result in success, but are scorned for not using similar subjects and practices. Conducting explicit and strict research on only animals and not making an effort to find more precise alternatives is simply narrow-minded. Discovering more accurate alternatives will advance the time it takes to achieve the goals of conducted …show more content…

The NIH alone spends 14 billion dollars annually on animal research, rather than spending that money on public health. Breakthrough technology has already created more efficient and cheaper alternatives. These alternatives consist of mechanisms like "organs on a chip" and artificial human tissues which are exponentially more reliable due to its much closer resemblance to human structure and physiology. These human skin cells and artificial human organisms make it a possibility to conduct research based on human genetics, meanwhile not trying to compare an entire diverse species of animal results with complex human anatomy. These artificial organs makes it beneficial to test potential drug candidates that may provide crucial information on its safety measures (Wyss Institute). Moreover, acquiring these alternatives eliminates the reason to test on animals for humanity's sake because there is now an advanced and harmless way to conduct research on rigid medical science. Humanity now has the opportunity to engage into a new innovative way to conduct research on reliable subjects that may emphasize treatments more rapidly than the time consuming animal testing. This new concept can even benefit the animals as compensation for their crucial contributions to the medical

Show More
Related
465 Words | 2 Pages

There is much controversy over whether or not animals should be used to test new procedures and medications. I personally believe that animal testing is crucial to scientific development. Every life lost is a tragedy but as seen in the story, Flowers for Algernon, by Daniel Keys, it will help us determine what will happen to a human test subjects without human losses. In this essay I will support my belief that animal research is important to human survival and is worth the risk. Animal research has played a vital part in nearly every medical breakthrough over the last decade.

Read More
1132 Words | 5 Pages

Scientist have been overstepping boundaries in many parts of the scientific world, one of these being animal testing. Animal testing is when scientist test on animals and inject them or mutate their genes for a human gain, typically with no gain for the animal. The National Library of Medicine posted an article on the flaws and harms of animal experimentation, these flaws can be put in these, “...three major conditions undermine this confidence and explain why animal experimentation, regardless of the disease category studied, fails to reliably inform human health: (1) the effects of the laboratory environment and other variables on study outcomes, (2) disparities between animal models of disease and human diseases, and (3) species differences in physiology and genetics.” The first condition being the influence of laboratory procedures and environments on experimental results. The conditions in these experiments show that, “animals in laboratories are involuntarily placed in artificial environments, usually in windowless rooms, for the duration of their lives.

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

Following this further, medicines are continuously being tested on animals to help with the treatments of strokes, diabetes, Parkinson’s, hepatitis C, birth defects and many more. Although The American for Medical Process organization agrees with most of society that animal testing is cruel, they also believe that there is no better way to further our medicines to one day find a

Read More
2243 Words | 9 Pages

Bioscience and technology have been advancing in development, contributing to a better quality of life for people. Before distributing a new medicine, though, scientists have to use many tests to evaluate whether the new medicine is good or not and how it affects human health, along with any other side effects that might occur. Consequently, animals are science’s top testing samples for such experiments. In this way, there are two controversial arguments coming from the use of animals for testing. On one hand, there is support for these practices, while others totally disagree with these experiments.

Read More
1787 Words | 8 Pages

Some reasons for animal use may be considered necessary, such as food or labor. Even animal testing before such innovations such as synthetic skin, computer models, or in vitro models - cells grown in Petri dishes or in test tubes - may be seen as unavoidable (“Ratting” 1). However, after these scientific advances, animal experimentation and animal research are not as necessary as before. In vitro tests are often more cost-efficient and time-efficient than animals tests (“Limitations” 2). With these alternatives, scientific knowledge can advance faster and more affordably than before.

Read More
1381 Words | 6 Pages

Human Medical Testing on Animals: A Real Cruelty Problem Many people of the modern day take pills and medication that are proven to work that cure everything from colds to eye problems; however, many people neglect and overlook the process of verification of the drug. Any drug that is meant for the consumption of humans, are first thoroughly examined and tested on a wide span of animals ranging from rats to monkeys. The sad truth is, the animals that are put through this process are usually treated both poorly and eventually die. On average, according to an article titled Speaking of Research: US Statistics, around 26 million animals are used per year for the advancement of human medical technology.

Read More
1520 Words | 7 Pages

Everyday humans experiment new medical theories on animals to try and change the world. Although we cannot stop our testing on animals, we can make it better for the animals. Stephen R. Latham stated, “Even proponents of medical research on animals can see obvious ways in which the regulatory structure could be changed to benefit animals”. We should make it safer for the animals and care for them in a better way. They still are a living life form and should be treated like their life matters to.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Many medical breakthroughs involving animal research may still have been made without the use of animals, because there is no evidence to prove that animal research was the key component to finding these breakthroughs. Furthermore, in the article Animal Testing is Unnecessary it states, “the reason that animals have been test subjects for so long is that scientists believed their genetic makeup to be similar enough to humans. However. This is true” (Delzer 29). One of the biggest reasons that scientists test on animals is because they believed they were similar, as well as being just as complex as human biology but, that turned out to be

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

With human research, there will be no doubt about the safety of the drugs. Clinical research could be greatly expanded if funding for animal studies was redirected to clinical (human) research done by physicians. Using humans as test subjects would produce completely accurate results, and others can feel safe knowing that those products will not harm

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

Ray Creek, a board -certified doctor, explains how the use of these animals can hinder medical research. "The simplest explanation

Read More
1173 Words | 5 Pages

Thus, that is why many researchers use a mouse or chimpanzee as they share more than ninety percent of their DNA with humans. According to the Americans for Medical Progress, they lastly explain in the following that: “Animal-based research is extremely expensive and it requires a tremendous investment in well-trained people and special facilities. It is also heavily regulated: an institution must spend a significant amount of time and money to ensure that all applicable regulations and guidelines are met. Conducting animal-based research is not something that institutions undertake without a great deal of deliberation and preparation” (Americans

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

All animal species differ from one another biologically making the results difficult to interpret (“Using”). Results can also be easily manipulated too. News stories often leave out important information to make studies seem better than they really are. The public does not realize just how often experiments fail because no one wants to publish that information. Some universities even embellish their findings to make themselves look better.

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

PETA, an animal rights donor organization, has introduced alternative ways to test drugs. “Harvard’s Wyss Institute has created ‘organs-on-chips’ that contain human cells grown in a state-of-the-art system to mimic the structure and function of human organs and organ systems.” This technology can really influence the animal testing world because it is not time consuming, does not cost a lot of money, works efficiently, and is not cruel to the environment. Some scientists say we simply do not yet understand the complexities of the body well enough to be able to design suitable non-animal alternatives. Actually, we do know a lot about the human body because this new micro chip actually works.

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

For hundreds of years, human beings insist on finding means to create possibility for progresses in the scientific and medical field. In order to meet the expectation of people to develop skills for the bright future in researches, teaching, testing, safety evaluation and achievement evaluation in the field of life science, human beings start to use animals for experiments. Even though some people argue that sacrificing the innocent animals for experiments is merciless, animal experiments for human use should be kept based on the positive effects of animal experiments, which include the indispensible achievements in medical science, the advantage of animals’ simple body structures and the enacted laws to protect experimental animals. To begin

Read More
922 Words | 4 Pages

Aylin Doğaner 21363593 Section 1 INTRODUCTION Hey everyone. Today we are going to talk about why animals shouldn’t be used for research. First I’ll make the introduction. Then Gökçen will explain why animal experimentation is cruel and inhumane,Deniz will mention alternative testing technologies that can replace the need for animals,Sevim will point out the differences between animals and human beings and invalidity of animal research,.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document