Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

494 Words2 Pages

”The question is not, can they reason? nor, can they talk? but, can they suffer?” Many people mostly who are with animal testing assume that animals could not feel pain, so they do not suffer when experiments are performed on them. However, animals have central nervous systems just like humans which make them feel multiple variations of emotions such as fear, sadness, and pain. So, even if they cannot complain or scream during and after laboratory tests, they still feel pain. Moreover, sometimes animals are killed after the experiment if they had not died during it. Just in the United States more than 100 million of animals are killed yearly for research purposes (1). It is a huge number that in the end will lead to the extinction of animals. Thus, animal testing must be banned. …show more content…

This previous claim is not completely true because 90% of experiments on animals show positive outcomes, which means that the meant substance is safe for human usage, while it is not (2). For example, thalidomide which is known as the most failed example of animal tests in the 1960s and 1950s (3). A thalidomide medication caused many tragedies worldwide after its utilization as a treatment of morning illness in pregnancy (3). More than 10,000 infants were born with underdevelopment of their limbs, heart-breaking disorders and some others miscarried or were stillborn (3). Although the tests of thalidomide on different kinds of animals such as dogs, armadillos, pigs and various rodents were successful, the drug was harmful to human beings