Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Limitations on animal testing
Controversy over testing on animals
Audeiences for animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Limitations on animal testing
Controversy over testing on animals
Audeiences for animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Animal Welfare Act of 1966, was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson, and it’s the only Federal law in the United States that regulated treatment and care of animals in research. Animals like rats, mice, birds and other cold-blooded animals are excluded from this law. Dogs, cats, guinea pig, and warm-blooded animals are well protected under this law. Question is why, are the laboratory experiment animals are not protected and treated well. Should we continue experimenting new drug on these animals and make our life easy on their pain or should we for better meant for our society practice and observe new drug on these animals.
Animal welfare has been a controversial subject in recent years. Nowadays, consumers are placing more attention to their consumption of animal product. The fact that there are diverse consumers with dissimilar perspectives on the meat industry makes animal welfare a complex international public policy controversy that also needs to take economical, scientific, cultural and ethical dimensions into consideration. The government can change the consumption behavior of the consumers and the production process of livestock by intervening the market using a ‘carrot’ approach so that the price system will lead the society to an efficient outcome of animal welfare. Since animal welfare is an increasing concern, numerous countries are reconsidering the way animal welfare is embedded in legislation for housing and care of animals.
Even animals protected by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) can be harmed and abused because no one knows what happens behind the doors of those labs. Animal testing should not be performed on a worldwide
The Animal Welfare Act of 1966 was supposed to have eliminated the mistreatment of animals in testing. Everyone became reassured that the animals were not being harmed or mistreated and that it was for a good cause. However, the law doesn’t protect the most commonly used animals in testing. The Animal
In the past few decades, humans have become more and more self-centered rather than becoming more aware of the dangers they are putting animals through. Animal right activists have been trying to put a stop to harmful animal experiments which in the end are only benefiting humans. The Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) is a well known group that for the last 36 years has been trying to establish an Animal Bill of Rights in order to protect animals’ legally. The presented Bill of Rights would protect animals from life-threatening experiments as well as provide safety to their physical and psychological necessities in order to live a healthy life. Animals should most definitely not be given a Bill of Rights in order to secure them from inhumane
In recent years, there has been a growing awareness and interest about animal welfare in food production. A nationwide Survey had confirmed consumers recognized that farm animals were being treated poorly in factory farms. The majority of the public desired strict laws concerning the treatment of animals to be passed.
According to animal welfare charity One Kind there are more than 1000 species of mammals, birds, invertebrates, reptiles and amphibians, and hundreds of fish species, are involved in the pet trade. (Reptiles as Pets, 2017) Some exotics are sourced unethically and this can cause harm to the species and habitats in the wild. There are ways that are classed as ethical and cause minimal damage to the eco system and the exotic animals. I think the most ethical ways are, Captive born/hatched because the animal would not know any different from the environment it has grew up in and it would not miss its natural habitat in the wild which will lessen the stereotypical behaviours caused by a new environment, and it does not affect the population or effect the eco system, also the animal does not have to go through the stress of being transported from its native country to the country of sale as this has a high mortality rate for exotics.
This is a big crime in many states. According to the article, it states that “When labs do not provide water for gerbils, when they don’t keep careful watch over newborn puppies, and they don’t provide safe cages for monkeys they are breaking the law.” If the people that are doing animal testing are breaking the law, then why haven’t the police shut them down yet. People get pulled over for going 3 mph over the speed limit yet the police can’t put an end to animal abuse. Its sad that people just sit around and do nothing about it.
The Animal Welfare Act was signed into law by President Lyndon B Johnson on August 24, 1966. This act to this day, is the only federal law placed in the United States that regulates the treatment of animals for testing and observing. The AWA only requires the minimum standards of care and treatment for certain animals. (AWA) The original law that was passed in 1966 states that dogs, cats, birds, mice, rats, and many other animals were intended to be used for purposes of research or experimentation.
“This law excludes roughly 95 percent of the animals tested upon—such as rats, mice, birds, fish, and reptiles—and provides only minimal protections for the rest. Labs are not required to report non-AWA protected animals.” (Animal Legal Defense Fund, 2022).This won't protect animals in animal testing if it's not protecting all animals tested on. It would inevitably be ineffective. They won't know what's really happening to all the animals in these experiments if they don't get reports on all of the
Arguments- In the moral case for protecting human rights Tommy the chimpanzee deserves to be granted legal rights because he is a legal person. In civil law, a person counts as an entity in one’s own right. This means that corporations and the objects can be counted as a person. Who is to say that chimpanzees are not legal homo-sapiens?
We as the affirmative define animal welfare as the right to test on animals as long as the animal is being treated well. Meaning the animal has the right to a clean environment food and water as well as proper health care for the animal making animal testing
The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) is the central law that oversees the humane care, control, treatment, and transportation of animals used in laboratories (PETA, 2004). It is known as a law that controls the condition of animals used in experiments, but the legality of these tests is not enforced by most of the famous countries. Both the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the Food and Drug Administration does not require any particular product test because there is no law that requires animal testing for cosmetics and household products. Though the regulation is not forcing any companies to use animals as their tools in doing experiment or cosmetics testing, there are few countries and people that support animal testing for the efficiency and the benefit that other types of testing do not
Unfortunately, even with the protection from the AWA can (and are still) being abused and tortured. Many industries are using animals for the experiments to “better or create a safer product” for human
Legislation prohibiting cruelty against animals originated in the English Parliament in 1822, and variations of this type of legislation proliferated over the next century, particularly in countries formerly under English colonial rule. A number of countries continue to have laws on prevention of cruelty to animals that date from early to mid-20th century, before the significant development and internationalization of the animal welfare movement. Animal cruelty legislation prohibits the most extreme, deliberate or willful forms of mistreatment of animals, imposing criminal sanctions for certain acts that constitute "cruelty to animals". This is in contrast to animal welfare legislation, which assumes that some conditions are unavoidable collateral