Should College Athletes Get Paid Research Paper

College Athletes Should Get Paid The average college athlete works 43.3 hours per week for their sport, which is the equivalent to a full-time job. The definition of pay according to Oxford Languages is to give someone money that is due for work done. College athletics generate huge amounts of revenue for universities. The NCAA restricts any college athlete from getting paid for anything other than a scholarship and/or housing. Although there is opposition, paying college athletes is beneficial because colleges gain revenue from athletes to compensate the athletes, and athletes work hard to play a sport but do not get compensated for their work. To begin, colleges gain enough money from athletes to pay them. Initially, universities gain tons

Also, college athletes gain things like elite coaching and a place where they can show off their talent (Gale in Context Online Collection 2). On the contrary, if an athlete made the sports team, then they would not necessarily need coaching because they have what it takes, and a chance at a professional level is not guaranteed. So athletes need to be compensated to have a better chance in the future. Furthermore, “The NCAA, which had called on him to veto the bill, argued that it would destroy the distinction between amateurs and pros” (Associated Press 2). On the other hand, college athletes may as well be pros because they put in the work and effort while making sacrifices that a pro might need to make. Plus, when someone uses the word amateur it means someone who is not a top player and just plays, a pro is when they are great at it and that is what college athletes are. Obviously, paying college athletes is an advantage. Overall, although there is opposition, paying college athletes is beneficial because athletes work hard to play sports for their college but do not get compensated, and colleges gain enough income from sports to pay