ipl-logo

Should College Athletes Get Paid Research Paper

1030 Words5 Pages

College Athletes Should Get Paid The average college athlete works 43.3 hours per week for their sport, which is the equivalent to a full-time job. The definition of pay according to Oxford Languages is to give someone money that is due for work done. College athletics generate huge amounts of revenue for universities. The NCAA restricts any college athlete from getting paid for anything other than a scholarship and/or housing. Although there is opposition, paying college athletes is beneficial because colleges gain revenue from athletes to compensate the athletes, and athletes work hard to play a sport but do not get compensated for their work. To begin, colleges gain enough money from athletes to pay them. Initially, universities gain tons …show more content…

Also, college athletes gain things like elite coaching and a place where they can show off their talent (Gale in Context Online Collection 2). On the contrary, if an athlete made the sports team, then they would not necessarily need coaching because they have what it takes, and a chance at a professional level is not guaranteed. So athletes need to be compensated to have a better chance in the future. Furthermore, “The NCAA, which had called on him to veto the bill, argued that it would destroy the distinction between amateurs and pros” (Associated Press 2). On the other hand, college athletes may as well be pros because they put in the work and effort while making sacrifices that a pro might need to make. Plus, when someone uses the word amateur it means someone who is not a top player and just plays, a pro is when they are great at it and that is what college athletes are. Obviously, paying college athletes is an advantage. Overall, although there is opposition, paying college athletes is beneficial because athletes work hard to play sports for their college but do not get compensated, and colleges gain enough income from sports to pay

Show More
Related
103 Words | 1 Pages

College schools provide for student athletes enough. They pay for everything provided for the the students whether it’s scholarships or playing in the school games. Through it all it really doesn’t matter if they (the athletes) get paid for, it’s the opportunity that the coaches and university give them to play on the

Read More
2997 Words | 12 Pages

Building on the financial disparities, another significant issue with paying athletes is because it takes away from the main priority of college. Paying college athletes undermines the primary purpose of higher education: academics. Colleges are institutions of learning first, and sports should come as a complement to this educational mission. An article that supports this is “Should College Athletes Be Paid,” which was published under Junior Scholastic, where they state: College sports provide hundreds of thousands of student athletes the opportunity to play the sports they love while getting the education and skills they need to succeed after college.

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

Athletes put in so much time and effort and generate huge amounts of money that it is only right to grant them pay. When playing college sports there's usually no time in between to have a job because the athletes are either practicing, exercising or at school. According to CNN, players devote 14 hours a day to football related activity. It consists from 8:30 AM to 10:30 PM ( CNNMoney) . In the offseason the athletes practice

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

Argument: ‘It is not their job to play sports; it is an extracurricular activity that is pursued while pursuing a higher education.’ from Anderson. So why should college athletes be paid, since they are based on their reputation. College student-athletes are given a rare opportunity. For example before you go to college you will get scouted from the university during high school.

Read More
1373 Words | 6 Pages

Athletes generate revenue, but consequently they rarely see the money. Colleges and the NCAA bring forth a tremendous amount of money, and claim that it goes back for the sake of the athletes, but none of which has yet to be seen as beneficial. The fact that these college athletes go to college to receive an education is sometimes the only excuse some people will ever

Read More
1046 Words | 5 Pages

Not all colleges have a lot of resources, but NIL money from athletes can benefit the colleges in these ways. Athletes are getting this money from companies wanting to advertise the players to gain money while giving athletes money. Colleges benefit when colleges get an amount of this money and when they are getting money from people going there like scholarships, apparel, etc. This shows how beneficial and opportunity-positive college athletes being paid can be because it benefits schools in ways that are more than

Read More
920 Words | 4 Pages

According to Smith, "Paying college athletes would fundamentally change college sports and undermine the principles of amateurism and fair competition that they are built upon. "(Smith) He argues that college athletes are already receiving valuable benefits and paying them would create an unfair advantage for certain programs and lead to a decline in the quality of college sports. " The NCAA is already facing issues with competitive balance between schools, and paying players would only exacerbate those issues,"(Smith) he adds. Additionally, the article points out that "paying college athletes would raise questions about how much they should be paid, and whether or not they should be taxed.

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

If college athletes got paid the care for their education would decrease. The thought “I am still getting paid so I can skip class” will occur in their heads. This would make them employees. So then the purpose of college, to get an education, would be defeated.

Read More
1829 Words | 8 Pages

There is no reason to pay college athletes because they are students first and academics should be one’s first priority, they already receive their fair share in extras, many of the athletes receive financial help through athletic scholarships, and the NCAA is an amateur enterprise and no amateur athlete in any sport is paid. The main reason colleges exist is to allow people the chance to get an education and earn a degree. Student-athletes are no exception to this. Just as other students are involved in clubs or groups, athletes play sports. Those students are students first

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

But with most of the athletes that are playing at the highest level of college sports, their education is being almost entirely paid for. These athletes should be trying to set up a life after their respective athletic careers are over. The student athlete gets to enjoy the gift of a near free of cost education, using their athletic talents to pay for their education, and the perks that go along with

Read More
1358 Words | 6 Pages

Firstly, college athletes work just as hard as the pros. College athletes have to play hard every time they are on the court because they are playing for a chance to enter in the pro leagues. Professional athletes play the same game as college players so why should they get paid and college players should not. College athletes also spend a lot of time on training and travel time for their sport plus they also have to focus on graduating. This takes up almost they whole schedule and leaves little time for a job, in which paying athletes for playing is a great way to help with that.

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

College athletes have gained an increase in popularity over the years. The result of this is a huge increase in revenue by the NCAA and universities. The increase in revenue has sparked a debate on whether College athletes should be paid beyond their scholarships. Well, have you ever worked a full-time job? How about working a full-time job and not being compensated for the work you put, the money you make for the company, and the risks you take while doing it?

Read More
1233 Words | 5 Pages

People have debated the century long question about if college athletes should be paid, and in recent years the question has become more and more prominent. The short answer is no, and the evidence that supports that argument is plentiful. Although there are many people who do support the counterargument that college athletes should be paid due to their such tight schedules. There is an argument for both sides of the issue regarding college athletics compensation, but only one side stands higher than the other. That side supports that college athletes should not be getting paid while they attend college just because they play their sport on the side.

Read More
1344 Words | 6 Pages

Should College Athletes be Paid? Being a fulltime student in college is hard enough but being a college athlete can be closely related to having a fulltime job. I know this because I am a college athlete. The issue is that college athletes are considered student-athletes that means they are amutur athletes and school comes first so therefore since they are not considered professional they can not be paid.

Read More
986 Words | 4 Pages

Paid There is a long on-going debate on whether college athletes should be paid. There have been many articles, essays, papers, and debates about the issue. I think that college athletes should be paid because as athletes they won’t have enough time in their sports season to get a normal job. Scholarships aren’t as secure and beneficial to the students as they used to be.

Read More

More about Should College Athletes Get Paid Research Paper

Open Document