If NASA’s budget increased, we could discover more planets. Earth isn’t going to last us forever. We should invest in discovering and studying new planets and galaxies so the human race can strive and prosper forever, even if that means not living on Earth
We need to understand that investment on space exploration is not necessarily a bad thing. There are bound to be some casualties, but as educated individuals we must look at the bigger picture. We need to understand the value of NASA and its missions before shunning it down. The future of NASA’s projects lies in the hands of the government Privatization can be considered as a solution to the funding problem as entrepreneurs provide the necessary funds and ideas and thus, reducing the burden on taxpayers. NASA has definitely made the world a better place to live and cutting down of funds will only suppress any form of discovery and advancement.
"That's one small step for a man, and one giant leap for mankind. " These famous words by Neil L. Armstrong still ring true, but not in the way presented. After the end of WWII, a new conflict began between the Soviet Union and America, which later became known as the Cold War. Tensions between the two countries, who both were attempting to prove their systems of government were best, led to wars in Korea, a competitive arms race, extreme espionage, and issues such as the Cuban Missile Crisis. As the "war" dragged on, the eyes of the countries turned to space as the new frontier, with both countries determined to prove their dominance by accomplishing the most things in space.
The sending of men to the moon with a safe return to Earth showed the world that America was a notable contender in the Space Race. According to Khan Academy, “The “space race” was a Cold War competition between the United States and the Soviet Union to develop aerospace capabilities, including artificial satellites, unmanned space probes, and human spaceflight.” The United States government formed the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, or NASA, in 1958 to be the primary research agency to experiment with and analyze space and the exploration of it. Although the Soviet Union had some early on successes in the Space Race, the Americans did not give up. In May of 1961, Alan Shepard became the first American pilot in space.
If the US did not compete so blindly and ever so narrow-mindedly distort their greed for power with the question of mankind’s future in space, I believe that a portion, if not all, of its NASA funds would be much more beneficial in the research field of disease cures and the ongoing battles against poverty and world hunger, issues that dawn on our planet right
NASA Funding This year, the federal government is spending 19.5 billion dollars on The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Roff). NASA was established in 1958 and has led most of the US space exploration efforts including the Apollo Moon Lading missions, the International Space Station, and many more (Hourihan and Parks 19). Some people and other opposing government- supported organizations would say that NASA is a waste of money.
Humanity has been fascinated with space for thousands of years but is it worth it? The first people on the moon was Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin in 1969. We have not gone back to the moon for more than 40 years. NASA only gets about 0.48 percent of the federal budget (ballotpedia.org). After examining space exploration it is clear that we need to spend money on it because it improves the economy, advances technology, and forges diplomatic relationships.
We, the U.S. citizens, are wasting money on launching rockets into space that have a high chance of failure. While most of NASAs’ projects are very safe and often succeed, the risk of failure is astronomical. According to Popular Science “Over a span of twenty years, NASA has spent over $20,000,000,000 (20 billion) on cancelled projects.” They have also wasted, “$46,000,000,000 (46 billion) on canceled weapon programs as well.” With this amount of money wasted on failed projects and weapon programs, imagine what construction projects we could have done.
Attention Congressman Burgess, Our nation is the greatest in the world, yet we have our flaws. In order to fix the defects of the United States, I believe our current laws on the economy, foreign policy, and criminal behaviour must be revised. This letter will cover a specific issue in each of the aforementioned categories. I believe that the government needs to increase the budget for space programs like NASA and SpaceX. Looking around, you will find countless inventions.
Some could say that spending that amount of money on something that could go wrong at any moment is a poor use of funds, just like the Challenger space shuttle explosion that occurred on January 28th, 1986, killing seven crew members. This is the main argument of many who do not agree with space exploration, and it might be the only one required to fight against the daring venture. The issue at hand is whether or not valued time and resources should be used to explore the depths of space, or if those resources would be better used for our planet and the people who live here. This is a problem that people should care about since either way, a large amount of money will be spent, problems will be solved, and even technological advancements could be made. All of these things are for the betterment of mankind.
Careers in the space exploration field such as astronauts and aeronautical engineers intrigue young boys with around 15% of them wanting to follow in that career, (Elmer). The results of this survey sponsored by LinkedIn, proves how space exploration intrigues younger men; however, what about the young girls? In this same LinkedIn survey, only around 2% of girls wanted to follow a career in this same industry. Government funding enthusiasts support the funding by describing how it inspires young minds to become scientists and explorers, (Etzioni), but private sector enthusiasts developed another standpoint. To inspire both boys and girls, the private sector believes seeing a woman rise to the rank of CEO, head engineer, or some other important title, will result in a larger intrigue from the female population, (Markovich).
Colonizing Mars Mars is often voted by people as being the most likely place for humans to colonize after we are done with Earth. This is often said because of Mars’s similar size to Earth and similar climate. However, Mars might not be the best place to go when we decide to make our first extra-terrestrial home. Whether you believe we should colonize another planet or not, evidence proves that moving to Venus is both logical and cost effective. There is much more promise in visiting Venus and much more we can learn.
Mars Debate Essay Is it a really good idea to live to live in Mars? Who would even live in a dry and dangerous desert? There really is nothing despite the fact that there’s water beneath Mars, but it might not have anything of use. There is also the weather which can kill people. First off, we shouldn’t really go to Mars.
We learned to monitor orbiting astronauts- pioneering telemedicine & leading to unprecedented improvements in patient monitoring”(Fowler, 1). Funding for space exploration could help physicians go into space, test materials, bring them back (if promising), and use them on patients. Also adding to that, “ We would be a much more healthy planet and society, if we stopped warring with each other and wasting precious minerals that we have on this Earth -on- war, we would have more resources to spend on more important things such as daily
Throughout the 20th century, our views of space have changed. We started thinking about space, with the same way we started thinking about Pythagoras’s theory of how the world is round. Curiosity and rivalry have ignited the space race, but rivalry between United States and Soviet Union has boosted the development of the space race. The Cold War was ongoing so neither of country wanted to lose to each other. Also, this race determined which country was more advanced compared to another.
