Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American juvenile justice
Analysis of Juvenile sentencing
Youth justice system discretion in the system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Using juvenile drug court as an alternative to incarceration to decrease the rapidly increasing number of young offenders is a policy that includes various key concepts that one must understand. To start, juvenile drug courts are mostly voluntary. While some juvenile drug courts are mandated, this aspect has not motivated a vast majority of these courts to follow suit. Therefore, these programs are designed to keep youth from using any type of substance. These juveniles are obviously involved in this type of program due to their substance use/abuse issues.
The Juvenile Justice system is the investigation, supervision, adjudication, carement, and confinement of the youth who are at or below the state’s juvenile court jurisdiction, while the adult criminal justice system is those who are above the age. Using the textbook, Crime Justice: A Brief Introduction 11th Edition, and slides 5-6 in the chapter 13 PowerPoint, multitudes of differences were found between the different systems. In the juvenile justice system, there is more prominence found in the child’s best interest, rather than with the legal issues in guilt and innocence as found on page 411. In the Adult court system though, it is mostly/completely focused on the criminality aspect and legal issues. In the juvenile justice system, there
Every year, thousands of adolescent children are arrested for commiting crimes. Every year, the courts must decide how to deal with these children. Juvenile courts use a variety of methods when dealing with juvenile delinquents. The two main techniques that the courts use are harsher methods focused on scaring adolescents out of further crime, and more compassionate methods focused on positive reinforcement.
Which lays out a clear goal and set of guiding principles to help courts determine the right juvenile sentence. The goal of youth sentences is to hold young people responsible by enforcing penalties that have real repercussions for them, encourage their rehabilitation, and help them reintegrate into society. In this way, youth sentences help to ensure the public's long-term safety. The requirement that a punishment be proportionate to the gravity of the crime and the young person's level of accountability is a fundamental tenet of juvenile sentencing. In other words, the punishment must reflect the severity of the crime, the maturity of the juvenile offender, and the circumstances surrounding the crime.
Discuss and describe the process in which juvenile cases can be transferred to adult courts. Transfers, waivers, and certifications are all a formal procedures of moving a juvenile to adult court for trial instead of allowing them to remain in juvenile court. By moving a juvenile to adult court, it is then possible for harsher punishments to be imposed, for just deserts and severe punishments for violent offenders, fairness in administering punishments suitable because of one’s actions, a deterrent to decrease juvenile violence, less leniency compared to the juvenile court system, and a way for juveniles to accept responsibility for their actions. The process of transferring juvenile cases to adult courts is done through several different
The Juvenile Justice System is something that is often overlooked but there are so many things wrong with it. The things I know about the Juvenile Justice is that when a minor begin to commit crimes they have to deal with the juvenile system which is associated with lawyers, judges, police officers and probation officer. They court hearing and deal with the crimes that the juvenile has done. Most systems place the minors in juvenile centers or detentions but other gets trial as adults. Two articles found on the Florida Southwestern College Library database discussed the Juvenile Justice System, how to make it better and the child trial as adult problem.
In both systems, the juniors and adults have the right to an attorney. They also have the right to confront or challenge, and cross-examine the witnesses presented in court, and the right against self-incrimination. Both systems also present individuals with the privilege to notice of the accusation or charge presented against them and finally, the prosecution party in both teams should prove beyond
We live in a society today, juvenile justice is a concern for law enforcement. One thing us whether or not to try teen criminals in adult courts and sentence them to adult prisons. In virtually all states there are juvenile justice systems where teens are tried and put into juvenile facilities. The main focus of these facilities is to rehabilitate juveniles, not just punish and imprison them. The problem is that some teens are still being tried in adult courts and sentenced to adult prisons.
The Juvenile Justice System is different in a way that most systems cannot compete with because they look to better help the minor by placing the minor in the most reasonable and best situation for himher. In some situations today, minors are to be tried in a criminal court if the offense is serious enough. Juvenile delinquency refers to a
Method Participants Participants in this study were selected via volunteers from the Longview Teen Court System (LTCS) and the Gregg County Texas Juvenile Detention Center (GCJDC), the parent, legal guardian, or otherwise of each participant yet to reach his 18th birthday, and volunteers from the Billy Moore Correctional Center (BMCC). The LTCS and GCJDC are located in Gregg County, Longview, Texas; a major hub city for East Texas with an estimated population of 80,000 as of 2015. The LTCS is a non-profit organization which advocates for adolescents charged with Class C Misdemeanor offenses or less the opportunity to circumvent the Longview Municipal Court judicial system. Although it is presided over by a real Judge, if adolescents successfully
The third suggestion would be fixing the Juvenile court system. There had been many unfair cases among youth offenders for over the last 50 years. Cases where youth offenders end up being charged as an adult, being charged for the crimes they have done and their sentencing. According to the Model for change article on Juvenile indigent defense, “Young people in trouble with the law have a right to legal counsel, but they frequently don’t get the timely or adequate representation they need” (“Reform Areas”). Other than the unfair charges for youth, when it comes for youth having the right to counsel and accept plea offers, they will not fully understand their actions.
Providing the offenders with guidance and rehabilitation techniques they are less likely to re-offend. The benefits of Youth Court are that the program doesn’t just help the offenders, it also aids the numerous volunteers that give their time to the program. It provides the volunteers experience and knowledge of how court hearings progress and the jobs involved. It can help them try out something new, and see if they want to further a career in that field.
Juvenile court is “a court of law responsible for the trial or legal supervision of children under a specified age”. In the United States, anyone under the age of eighteen is considered a juvenile, but, depending on the severity of the crime, anyone above the age of fourteen can be tried as an adult, or in criminal court. Juvenile Justice is “the area of criminal law applicable to persons not old enough to be held responsible for criminal acts”. The last term that I will explain is the term “delinquent”. By this term, I mean “(typically of a young person or that person's behavior) showing or characterized by a tendency to commit crime, particularly minor
While many may think the juvenile offender is incapable of fully understanding their actions or the consequences which arise as a result thereof and as such, should be treated with kid-gloves, I would tend to disagree. A look at the crimes committed by juveniles here in the city of Memphis in recent years reflects the inadequacy of the juvenile court system and its ability adequately deterand / or rehabilitate the offenders which come through its doors. As the instances of violent juvenile mob attacks or altercations seem to have increased, the idea that the offenders are not fully aware of their actions and as such should be given a slap on the wrist, effectively giving them free reign to commit other acts of criminal behavior and set out to intimidate the public once again is preposterous.
The type of sentencing should be based on the minor’s charges and previous criminal activities. However, the ultimate goal should be to make them better citizens. Furthermore, community programs will help the juvenile for long-term behavior improvement. Carry each other’s burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ (Galatians 6:2). It is the