Everyone has their opinion, but is everyone well-informed about what they are choosing to believe in? I have always known animal agriculture to have both positive and negative impacts, and the ways the industries are conducted also have both rights and wrongs within them. I’ve learned that a lot of the contemporary issues should, in theory, rely on one, simple, question: “Do the positives outweigh the negatives?” But those that have ideas about animal agriculture that go beyond this idealistic question have a difficult time seeing the big picture. Throughout attending this class, I have had beliefs about animal agriculture that have both continued and developed, as well as change drastically. I have always had hesitations about what negative impacts GMOs may bring in the future. Are we sure that there will be no impact on humans from consuming GMOs now or in our future generations? I did not believe this had been studied well enough to prove that it will do no harm. As I learned more about this, I found that GMOs may be very important for one day feeding the increasingly hungry third world. My belief now is that even though GMOs may help feed the …show more content…
Better for the people, and most importantly for the environment. My understanding of this idea has been modified after attending ANSC 101, showing me that there is no evidence to support that organically raised animals are better than conventional in terms of human health and the environment. There are no clear health benefits of organic farming versus conventional farming. Also, there is some information that actually shows organic farming has a more adverse effect on the environment than conventional farming, producing 50% more greenhouse gases than conventionally raised cattle. For these reasons my ideas and opinions on organic farming have changed drastically, leading me to believe that organic is really no better than conventional, and may even be