ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws

744 Words3 Pages

People are smart and will find a way to get around the law if one is created to ban guns. People have done this with the topic of drugs; since drugs are illegal, people have resorted to get high off of new legal substances like sharpies. Using this as an example of what people do to get around the law will help prove that if guns are banned, people would create a new way of harming someone. This new harmful invention could potentially become worse that using a gun ever was. These examples go back to how the guns don’t decide if they want to kill a person, they don’t have a brain; it is the people behind the gun pulling the trigger deciding that they want to commit an illegal and harmful act upon another human being or living animal (Larry Greenemeier). …show more content…

Making the ownership of guns illegal actually promotes the formation of illegal gun gangs and trading. Usually, from my experience, when a certain minor action or object is prohibited or illegal, it makes a group of people want to do or obtain that action or object more than they would have if it was legal. As a personal example, while I was in Greece last summer visiting my family, I noticed the difference in how the teenagers and young adults acted in comparison to in America. Driving in Greece is prohibited to everyone under the age of 18. The people I have met there have told me that they think this age is too old. As a result, I would see many underage drivers, mostly boys driving mopeds, as young as 13 or 14 years old. Those people wanted to do something that was prohibited and illegal until they were the age of 18. In America, I personally have not seen this problem occurring as bad as I saw it in Greece. We are allowed to receive our permit when we are 15 years old and 9 months. This is a reasonable age, and the people that I know are fine with this age. If we accept and are ok with the law then, from my experience, I have found that people seem to not want to break it. On the contrary, based on personal experiences, the people who were not ok with the law constantly felt the need to break it. My prediction is that, in the future, the

Show More
Related
226 Words | 1 Pages

In San Diego cali. school there was a shooting with a 15 year old who killed 2 people and injured 13. Some say that he was smiling when he pulled the trigger. this event and many others have lead to the demand for stricter gun laws. however, gun laws punish honest citizens.

Read More
421 Words | 2 Pages

Therefore, if that argument does not make sense Ivins, she would naturally support the banning of guns because “[g]uns do kill” (215). By outright banning guns, this may result in the creation of a black market for guns. Since guns would be illegal, more people would resort to underhanded methods of obtaining firearms. This is similar to what happened when there was a prohibition of the sale, transportation, and manufacturing of alcohol across the nation. During this prohibition, places became dangerous because gangs were at war as a result of trying to remain in control of alcohol smuggling operations.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

In 1987, the bill that would soon become a law and make buying guns safer was introduced in congress. This bill was named after James Brady hints the name, “Brady Bill.” James Brady was the White House Press Secretary at the time. He was permanently disabled after receiving a gunshot wound to his forehead in 1981, in the attempted Ronald Reagan assassination. This bill required licensed firearms importers, manufactures, or dealers to wait five days before selling a handgun to another person not licensed under federal law.

Read More
850 Words | 4 Pages

Guns do not need stricter rules and regulations or bans, it is mainly social problems that is the cause of these controversial mass shootings and guns are just a tool to make things easier. Anti Gun lobbyists has been using the media and recent tragedies to amplify their message,

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

The biggest issue of banning guns is not only this trivial aspect which I just mentioned, is the entire smuggling network there would be evolving guns. The police also state that robbers would create a huge black market selling people, drugs, and many other objects to eventually buy guns. After all this chaos is established, the government wouldn’t be able to do anything to avoid guns, as they will be all illegal, crime rate percentages would leap, and America's developed nation would slowly lose its

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

Over the years the United States has seen an increase in gun violence crimes across the country, but no change in gun laws. However, citizens believe that establishing gun laws would be taking away their legal rights of acquiring and possessing firearms. The original legal right of possessing firearms is stated in the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. However, installing gun laws will not diminish a citizen’s legal right, but simply help the issue. The establishing of gun laws will help protect citizens and create a safer community.

Read More
1700 Words | 7 Pages

In the past, the major gun control legislations that have been put into effect have not stopped people from obtaining firearms (Gun Control.) There have also been cases in the past where cities have attempted to ban handguns. After the ban was put into effect, murder rates tended to rise instead of drop, unlike what most people might assume. Crime rates and violence also skyrocketed after the bans were put into effect. Another problem with taking guns away, or banning them, is that the government cannot expect everyone to abide by the laws.

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

Making guns illegal to own will turn out the same as making drugs illegal. Most people will follow the law put there’s always going to be a black market, and there’s always going to be law breakers. People are going to break the law, that is a known fact and the banning of guns is only going to solve part of the

Read More
1398 Words | 6 Pages

To many people are killing themselves with guns. A Little more than half of suicides are done with guns. Making it harder for someone who is not mentally stable to own a gun or someone who will inflict pain on themselves to get a gun. The amount of money that is spent on gun related accidents can decrease if the gun laws were enforced. In theory if the numbers of gun violence drop, taxpayers will be paying less in taxes.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Gun laws give too much power to the government and way less from the people, which will lead to government corruption. And, stated by ClearPictureOnline.com,”Guns don 't kill people, people do. We need to concentrate on the values and morals of our citizens and at the role the media plays in glorifying violence and the lack of respect for law.” (Shootout: Do We Need More Gun Control Regulations?) What people don 't understand is that they are taking away their own freedoms with Gun Control.

Read More
422 Words | 2 Pages

If it is illegal to own a gun, a criminal will not follow the law and he will have a gun. But regular citizens won’t, meaning that the criminal will be more drawn to steal or harm someone. Making guns illegal will only increase the crime rates in America, not decrease them.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

Guns are a cost-benefit ratio along with everything else in this world. Guns don’t fire by themselves, so why do we need to outlaw guns when the gun doesn’t pull its own trigger? Instead, we need to work with the people using them. Gun laws are to keep people that aren’t supposed to have guns from getting guns and they are also in place to protect the people who have guns and give them the right to bear arms. Studies show that gun ownership has increased incredibly while at the same time crime has decreased to historic lows The second amendment says people have the right to bear arms and they can’t be taken away.

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

Gun laws simply penalize and restrict honest citizens while criminals continue to find ways and loopholes to arm themselves. Gun laws currently established serve their purpose rather poorly as criminals unceasingly buy guns even after they are said to be forbidden. History serves as a clear example of how guns protect the rights and liberties of individuals as it was private guns that aided colonists in fighting the British and gaining America’s

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

First and foremost, banning guns will not stop criminals from obtaining and committing crimes with them. Furthermore, guns don’t kill people; people kill people. Lastly, guns prevent the government from becoming tyrannical and oppressive. At first, one may think that banning guns would be a superb solution to the growing problem of gun violence.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws

Related Topics

Open Document