Psychological testing Essays

Introduction Psychological tests are immensely useful tools that are employed not only by social scientists, but also by a variety of other professionals for, among other things, the purposes of collecting data regarding specific populations in order to select target audiences, note changes, and plan development strategies (Lowenthal, 2001). This is not to say that these tests are without fault; aside from the limitations that are specific to each test, problems often arise due to the mismanagement

can be referred for psychological testing and assessments to measure the mental state of the client. These traits are measured by a person’s feelings, beliefs, and abilities that can cause mental problems for the client. These assessments allow psychologists to diagnose the client conditions, such as anxiety, depression, anger control and stress. According to this article these test measure the overall well-being and general assessment of the client personality. The psychological assessment includes

In the 1970’s a group of officers from the Los Angeles Police Department along with researchers from the Southern California Research Institute, developed a set of psychological test called the Improved Sobriety Testing. These were later renamed as the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests. These psychological divided attention tests were designed to be used by police officers on the roadside. They were intended to give an officer probable cause of driver impairment on the roadside, and to provide a

1. Introduction Testing was for a long time was seen as discriminatory and unjust in South Africa, but this perception is gradually changing (Foxcroft, 1997). Improvements in test development have led to the implementation of cross-culturally fair tests, and practitioners are pleasant aware of the advantages of sound assessment. Levy (2003) defines selection battery as a set of tests that can be used to make employee hiring decisions. The ability to determine how well a candidate is likely to perform

disorders for it affects them all. Mental disorders shouldn’t go untreated because the results could be never ending. Psychological testing should be an option to consider. Treating an illness in reasonable timing is necessary for a successful recovery, which is fundamental to a healthier life; many children suffer from mental illnesses, but parents are tentative about Psychological testing regardless of the fact that

2:1 Compare the strengths and limitations of assessments of a range of assessment methods with reference to the needs of individual learners. Workplace Observations, question and answer/professional discussions, projects/assignments, portfolios, witness statements.A good assessor will always take into account their learners needs and what particular subject they are studying for prior to confirming with learner type of assessment method to be used. Workplace observations This can evidence directly

Standardized testing refers to the administration and scoring (marking) of both theoretical and practical tests based on pre-determined standards or pre-established and reliable protocols. The scholarly body subdivides standard testing techniques into two similar, but distinct modules: criterion-referenced and the norm-referenced tests. The former module compares the student’s test scores to a pre-determined and pre-established criterion, for example, the school curriculum. The latter module compares

read for my assignment is titled Psychological Testing and American Society, and the editor’s name was Michael M. Sokal. The book had eight chapters that were established by different individuals. For example, chapter one and two was established from Sokal’s point of views as a historical and introduction context, and the chapters going forward were from other well-known authors/psychologist. The book was interesting, and provided a lot of information about testing. Prior to reading to this book,

research and consented to that research is unethical in my opinion. Without proper knowledge that they are being used for psychological drug testing, soldiers are unable to assess the costs and benefits of partaking in the study; therefore, they are unable to truly consent to the testing. Drug tests should be conducted in a controlled environment. As Szalavitz (2012) discussed, the testing conducted by the CIA from 1953 to 1964 presented this ethical dilemma. Individuals were given the drug without their

the use of animals in scientific and commercial laboratory testing. To begin with, animal experimentation subjects innocent creatures to immense physical and psychological agony through the employment of abusive, inhumane procedures. Currently, an approximate 26 million animals in the United States alone undergo trials and experiments devised to ascertain the efficiency and overall safety of products developed for human use (“animal-testing”). In a futile attempt to prevent the immoral treatment of

scientist of specimism. ( “Animal Experimentation: An Overview”, Paragraph 5) Regarding the inhumanity these test have caused is even worse when the test is successful because that means they had to go through even more animals to get that far. (“Testing on animals is poorly regulated”, Section 1, Sentence 4) Yes, many say it is helpful and it is; but it is inhumane, unfair, rude, self centered, and harsh to the animals used in experimentation. So, why

When it comes to the topic of testing the consumer products before putting them out on the market, a controversial issue has been whether animal testing is still viable or not. On one hand, many people are against animal testing and experimentation, arguing that alternatives such as computer modeling, and other scientific inventions would be as effective as animal testing. On the other hand, some argue that it’s viable, it makes products safe for us to use, and has helped discover treatments for

Animal testing should be banned It was said once by Gandhi : “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animal treated “ .In 1998 and according to the German Animal Welfare Act animal testing has been defined as the procedure of experimenting on animals in order to determine the drug dose, toxicity , and effectiveness before human precede it, this may include harming part or whole of an animal, pain, suffering, and damaging to its hereditary material. Returning

every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing.” (“About Animal”). The California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals. This statistic is only growing and has doubled in the past years. Currently, animals are mostly being used for cosmetic testing and scientific experiments. There are many benefits to testing on animals such as cures and treatments. For example, the

Animal Testing It happens every day. A patient suffering from a painful skin condition feels more comfortable with a drug that was once tested on rats. Another patient who has been given only months to live gets a reprieve through a procedure considered safe after initials experiments in pigs. Since the beginning of medical history, scientists have relied on the use of animals to test new substances and procedures to determine their safety and effectiveness. Because many medical practices that are

After reading the articles,”Why We Should Think Twice About Giving Genetic Tests to Our Kids” ,by Michael White, and “Genetic Testing for Kids:Is It a Good Idea?”, by Bonnie Rochman, parents should not give these tests to their children.If the children did take the test the result would outway the benefits, they would have anxiety, and the testing doesn’t always work. One main reason that a child should not the test is ,they could have anxiety for the rest of their lives. If a child took the genetic

Since the emergence of bio medicine, animal testing has been a focal point of controversy. Those opposed to the use of animals in scientific studies believe that it is important for humans to treat all living things with the same respect. Animal rights activists make the argument that we should not do anything to a piglet for example, that we would not want done to our own infants. In spite of these points, animal testing is a crucial part of advancing biology, medicine and the overall welfare of

Your heart crushes when you hear that number about your fur babies that are at home. Well, each year 100 million animals die from animal testing each year. If you hate so much that animals are dying on the roads by accident, why can’t we do something about animals that are dying in the hands of our people? (https://animal-testing.procon.org) Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation,

phase, but are not required to. Although many believe that this seems to be a good option as opposed to human testing, I feel that it is inhumane and unnecessary because it causes pain, suffering, and death to animals, has little scientific relevance, and cost taxpayers billions of dollars each year. Each year, millions of animals are tortured, hurt, or killed because of animal testing. These animals feel pain, isolation, deprivation, and misery. Many people believe that animals do not feel

Animal research has lead to some very groundbreaking scientific strides in the past couple years, and since we share 95% of our genes with a mouse, this testing can be very helpful to our health. Animals also suffer from the same diseases as some people, so the research is not only beneficial to humans, but animals too. This research is also the main thing veterinary science has relied on for their treatment of animals. Also, many surgical advances have been made by perfecting the procedures first