Scottish Parliament Essays

Independence There is a debate in Scotland about whether or not to be independent or to stay with the United Kingdom. There are two opposing positions in this ongoing debate. In 2011, the Scottish National Party won a majority in the Scottish parliament. They are the ones who support independence. The Scottish National Party wanted to hold a referendum to vote on independence. Scotland’s First Minister Alex Salmond supports the idea of Scotland being independent because he believes that Scotland

The Route to the Scottish Independence Referendum
 September 18, 2014 Scotland is an independent state until the time before 1 May 1707; there is no United Kingdom at that time before the establishment of The Acts of Union: The Acts joined the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland into a single, United Kingdom named “Great Britain”. But, on September 18, 2014 Scotland has arranged the day of Independence Referendum. It is another important day for World, Europe, United Kingdom and especially

key factors in determining this divide. In recent years there has been tangible effort from the Scottish government to narrow the gap, demonstrated in improved equality on the back of legislation and initiatives.

TOPIC: SHOULD SCOTLAND BE AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRY? INTRODUCTION The release of Scottish opportunity completed one common contention yet began new request with respect to the devolution of power in the UK. Is there any inspiration driving why Scotland should cut the age-long union with the UK and transform into a free country? By investigating some antagonistic impact of the autonomy, his paper attempts to review the completions of distinctive schools of considerations and partners, in order to

European states, the integration carries three institutional challenges towards the states. First, democratic legitimacy and sovereignty of European states are constrained due to political integration. As parliamentary sovereignty of a national parliament is contested by transfer of powers and the European Court of Justice (ECJ), its parliamentary supremacy diminishes. Second, a national government faces constant challenges from conflicting interests between the European Union (EU) and national governments

meaning it was very possible she would die childless. That possibility meant that it was very imperative to secure who would succeed Queen Anne. However, both Scotland and England wanted to decide who would succeed Queen Anne. In 1701 the English Parliament passed the Act of Succession, which stated that both Scotland and England would be passed to the protestant line to Sophia of Hanover, if Queen Anne died childless. However, Scotland was not very happy with that, and they retorted by passing the

Currently the mass emigration of Syrian Muslims continues this legacy that was started in the late 18th century. One of the great mass migrations that Canada witnessed was during the late 18th century, when Catholic Scottish Highlanders emigrated to Prince Edward Island. These Scottish Highlanders left their ancestral highland homes out of desperation, fear of cultural elimination by the English and for new opportunities to maintain their cultural identity. But why did the Scots believe emigrating

Martin Luther King discusses many philosophical principles in the “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” that relates with Aquinas discussion about law. Most of Martin Luther King’s philosophical ideas have to deal with natural law. According to Aquinas natural law is promulgated by reason and also rational participation in the eternal law. But in “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” we can see how human law is connected to natural law always. The two philosophical principles I find most interesting that Martin

When looking at the current state of Senate in Canada today, many provincial governments are unhappy with their position in parliament and how their voices are being heard in the federal government. Senate reform has been a popular topic for over 60 years, with minimal changes toward how Senate has been run since the Constitution amendment in 1982. Originally, the Senate was to be a platform where regional representation was shown at the national level, and at its creation was credited with three

What are some differences and similarities between the house of representatives and the senate? The founding government established the United States to have a Bicameral congress for many reasons. The first reason was that they wanted to reinforce the idea of checks and balances. That is, they wanted to ensure that neither the House of Representatives nor the Senate was able to gain too much power over the other. Another reason that congress is Bicameral is because the founding government wanted

Recommendation Given these points, this paper recommends that the Senate has to be reformed through constitutional amendments as the issues in Canada’s legislative branch of government have been undermining Canada’s democracy. In fact, the Senate currently operates as an ineffective and undemocratic chamber that costs millions in taxpayer’s money. The Senate has to undergo changes to reduce the term length of Senators as well as getting Senators elected rather than appointed. After the Supreme Court’s

proposals to Parliament without getting constitutional amendments. His first proposal never became law due to being refused by the then liberal dominated Senate while his second proposal Bill C-7, the Senate Reform Act, was also refused due to needing a constitutional amendment to implement it. (The Canadian Encyclopedia, Senate) The Senate Reform Act would have limited terms to nine years and allowed provincial elections for senators. In 2014 the Supreme Court of Canada made it clear that parliament could

Nancy Zhou Social 11A Mr. B September, 17th, 2017 Q: Should Canada keep, change or abolish the senate? The Reason Canada Need to Change the Senate Canada should change the Senate because the senate is useless, undemocratic and costly today. However, the principle of Senate is a good idea, so it is still needed and important. The Senate is a legislative body of the government, which has the almost the same power as the House of Common. If Canada abolishes it means that Canada won't have a place with

corruption the good work of the Senate been ignored. This has caused calls for reform to be brought back into the Canadian spot light. This paper will look at how the Canadian Senate should not be reformed. Intent at confederation, its role in parliament and its role as a final check and balance are all reasons the status-quo of the Canadian

Multiculturalism and its Relationship to Canada’s National Identity Though multiculturalism has been shown to be a wise policy economically and politically, the effects of multiculturalism has unintentionally complicated the Canadian national identity. Though multiculturalism is a significant part of the national identity of Canada, it has brought the population further away from national unity as the country struggles to maintain equality among and respect for all cultures. To derive a national

in how Canada is how it is. It is important that we do not take out a role in our government that has been going on for years, the possibility of taking something out and having our government not stable because of removing a crucial part in our parliament. Many people do not see appoint in having a Senate, since in their eyes it is useless. But, “the Senate is a distinctive and essential component of the Canadian constitutional order.” iv

In his book, William Shakespeare, Terry Eagleton offers a controversial insight to the role of the Witches in Macbeth. Eagleton views the Witches as the heroines of the drama for exposing the truth about the hierarchal social order describing it as, the pious self-deception of a society based on routine oppression and incessant warfare (Eagleton 1986:2). This essay will explore the implications of Eagleton’s insights, showing that even though they are controversial and original, they can very well

In efforts to better the Canadian senate Prime Minister Justin Trudeau publically stated that he plans to reform the senate. While critics of this part of parliament state that it is a system that needs to be abolished arguing that it is deepy partisan, laced in scandal with a lack of accountability and legitimacy. Justin trudeaus reforms call to make the public trustworthy of this institution; resolving some of this issues above.It is my position that the senate is a valuable institution for Canada

The Senate is a chamber of "sober second thought" in which its members review the legislation that has passed through three readings in the House of Commons. They review most of the bills with a lens that explanations for their regional constituents, particularly those who may not have figured into the debate of the MPs who represent most their constituents, and evaluate how each new law or policy would affect the Canadian people (Dodek, 2015, 39). But this legislative body has long been criticized

advocate ways to improve the Senate in today’s society. 1. The senate should better represent Canada’s diverse population. Canada is known for its multicultural comradeship and diversity but this fact is not reflected in the configuration of Parliament. If we were to take a close look at the House of Commons, we would instantly notice that most individuals are white men, supporting one of only four political parties. Statistically speaking, twenty percent of Canada’s population is of visible minority