ipl-logo

A Case Of David Eldrige's Guilty

546 Words3 Pages

The defendant, David Eldrige, should be found guilty of Mr. Armes's death because no reasonable doubt exists, proving Eldrige is guilty. After all, he had a motive to kill Mr. Armes because he wouldn't give him a raise. Also, there was no sign of a break-in, meaning the offender had to have a key, and the only other person to possess a key was David Eldrige. First, there is no reasonable doubt that Mr. Eldrige cold-bloodedly killed Mr. Armes for not giving him a raise to help gather a sum of money Mr. Eldrige had to pay back before the bank repossessed his house. One of the strongest pieces of evidence from the case of Mr Armes’s death is that David had the motive to kill Mr Armes because he recently asked for a raise but never received it. …show more content…

The evidence shows how he killed Mr Armes. He stole Mr Armes’s famous Super Burger recipe so he could sell it for the money he had to pay to the bank, and at the crime scene, they found David’s footprints all over. Next, there was no sign of any break-in at the restaurant where Mr. Armes was pronounced deceased. Which in return, means that the only way the murderer was able to get in was by key, and the only other person who possessed a key was Mr. Eldrige, while also knowing the safe code. As said, Mr. Eldrige was the only one who had an extra key to the restaurant and the only person to know the safe code other than Mr. Armes. While the crime occurred, the cash register was also robbed; looking at the safe, the recipe was also missing for the Super Burger. This shows that Mr. Eldrige walked into the restaurant and murdered Mr. Armes. Since this can prove that David could walk in and commit his crime of murdering Mr. Armes, he should be charged with

Show More
Related
550 Words | 3 Pages

Sophie Bloomhuff 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Mr. Eldridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defense claims he is not guilty, they are wrong because a witness saw David Eldridge at the crime before Mr. Armes was found dead shortly after screams were heard coming from the scene, Mr. Armes and Mr. Eldridge were the only people with access to the restaurant and combination to the safe and the Family Fun Restaurant had no sign of a break-in, also David Eldridge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes since the bank was going to repossess his house and Mr. Armes refused to give him a raise so Mr. Eld armes.

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

The defense explained that blood from the crime scene were transferred to David’s sweatshirt, socks, and sneakers when he encountered his family upon discovering their bodies. The state did agree with the defense in saying that some of the bloodstains found of the items belonging to David Camm were a result of transfer, however, some were the result of spatter. After hearing testimony from both the States and the defense expert witnesses, the jury deliberated for three days, and eventually found Camm guilty of murdering his family. David Camm was sentenced to 195 years in prison without parole (Mckay,

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

First, David Eldridge is guilty because he was found in the restaurant before Mr. Arms death. William Warden saw David Eldridge enter the Family Fun restaurant two hours before Mr. Armes was found dead. An hour later, he heard Mr. Armes screaming loudly. After waiting a while, Warden went into the restaurant to investigate, and that’s when he found the dead body. Mr Warden saw David enter the restaurant two hours before so

Read More
439 Words | 2 Pages

David Eldridge had wanted a raise from Mr. Armes forever and never got one, which gives him the perfect incentive to do something insane. The prosecution is correct in this case. Mr. Eldridge killed Mr. Armes because reasonable evidence exists. The strongest piece of evidence for this case to prove that David Eldridge is guilty is that he stole a spatula and never gave it back to Mr. Arms, who was killed by a spatula.

Read More
347 Words | 2 Pages

He's the only other one besides Mr. Arms with the code to the safe. Nobody else was in the restaurant when Mr. Arms was murdered. First, David Eldrige, the only other one with the code to the safe, and you touched the spatula that day before the murder. David was at the restaurant two hours before the murder.

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

Barbra Wheeler didn't kill Mr. Armes and also didn't steal the burger recipe. She didn't steal the recipe because there was no way for her to get into the building without a key and David Eldridge and Mr. Armes were the only ones with the combination for the safe. Barbra Wheeler is not guilty of murder, even if she tried to sabotage him in the past, she didn't steal the recipe and she didn't kill Mr. Armes. Please consider the reasons and evidence presented and conclude that David Eldridge is guilty of murder. He asked Mr. Armes for a raise and he was denied, he was in

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

This shows that David Eldridge had a motive to kill Mr. Armes and was angry at him, causing him to commit cold-blooded murder. In addition, David Eldridge is the only person who could have murdered Mr. Armes. According to the Police Investigator, there were no signs of forced entry, and Mr. Armes and David Eldridge were the only ones with a key. David Eldridge’s fingerprints were found on the metal spatula used to kill Mr. Armes, and he is the only person other than the man who was killed who knew the code to the safe.

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

Dear Jury Members:David Eldridge should have been found guilty because there were many signs and evidence pointing that he was there the night of the murder and that he had a motive for killing Mr Arms. The strongest piece of evidence that shows that he was the murderer first he asked Mr Arms for a rise and he was denied and he was so mad that he planned to kill Mr Arms and secondly he and Mr Arms were the only ones that knew the code to the safe and there was no sign of forced entry which means he was had the key to the building and the combination to the safe.the strongest piece of evidence in the case was that he had a motive to kill him which makes him a suspect.when david eldridge went to his boss for a raise and he got denied he was super

Read More
365 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that David Eldridge was the murderer of Mr. Arnes and that’s why David Eldridge should be found guilty of Mr. Arnes's death. My evidence strongly proves my argument. This is the case of David Eldridge. Many pieces of evidence prove that David Eldridge committed the murder of Mr. Arnes. One piece of evidence is that he had a rivalry with Mr Arnes.

Read More
459 Words | 2 Pages

The coroner concluded that Mr. Armes had bled to death, but the victim also had signs of blunt-force trauma to the back of his head, with some of it being caused by the spatula. There was no sign of a break-in at the restaurant so someone had to have a key to get in to kill him with the spatula and David still had the key into the building even though he did

Read More
603 Words | 3 Pages

Mr. Bennett should be found not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams because there is reasonable doubt. Mr. Bennett went into the kitchen to check on Mr. Adams. when he was lying on the ground with spilled coffee all around his body. When Mr. Adam went into the kitchen to go get some cream and sugar, but there was rat poison by the cream and sugar and it looked alike and Mrs. Swanson testified that he had bad eyesight. That Mr. Bennett wouldn't go into the kitchen to go check on Mr. Adams because he would already know that he was dead.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Two of the three testified this way. The one remaining testified that David has been suffering from visual hallucinations and during these murders he was in the psychic episode. However, the judge and the prosecution were all very skeptical of this analysis. They decided he was mentally competent at the time of the

Read More
1268 Words | 6 Pages

n.d.). Unfortunately, Mr. Hopkins was there when a dangerous act had accrued which caused the death of another person but he was not the person who caused the dangerous act and should not be tried as that person in which he could receive a life sentence in prison for that act. However, there is a part of the law that states a life sentence could be possible if a death accrues while committing or attempting to commit aggravated robbery which in accrued in this case (statelaws.findlaw.com. n.d.). Unfortunately, aggravated robbery means the robber was armed with a deadly weapon, had an accomplice, or actually inflicted serious bodily harm on the victim (crime-law.freeadvice.com.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

Mr. Bennett should be found not guilty because there is strong evidence that shows that he did not kill Mr. Adams. There is reasonable doubt that has been put against him but, there is also reasoning and evidence that he is not the one who killed Mr. Adams and that someone else has framed him for their actions. The strongest piece of evidence in this case was that if Mr.Bennet had killed Mr.Adams, he wouldn’t have checked his pulse because he would’ve already known he was dead and wouldn’t have had to check his pulse. Mr.Bennett states that he checked his pulse which shows evidence that he did not kill Mr.Adams because he would've already known he was dead. This evidence proves my claim because we all know that if you did kill someone with

Read More
1005 Words | 5 Pages

David was born on October 3, 1971. He grew up in Cascade Township, Olmsted county, Massachusetts in a two-story blue house surrounded by woods at the end of a long driveway, with his mother and father, Paulette(42) and Bernard(42), and 3 siblings, Diane (14), Richard (9), and his older brother Joe(18). David was only 16 when killed his family, in the early morning of February 18, 1988. The night before, David and his father had gotten into an argument, Allegedly the argument was about his father disapproving of the music David was listening to. David stayed up til three in the morning and then committed his crime.

Read More

More about A Case Of David Eldrige's Guilty

Open Document