ipl-logo

Arguments Against Animal Testing

743 Words3 Pages

Therefore, animals should not be experimented on because this targets innocent animals. Animals should not be used for medicine to take care of people. Researchers should find another way to find advances in medical research. Millions of animals help people that are dying to get better, but this hurts animals and scares them. I think the animals should not be tested on new medicine. So they can know if the medicine works on people. “Animals shall not be touched or tested on unless medical reasons (Medicine for people) they are infected with rabies. (Maria Cantwell). Animals should not be used for product or medical research. In addition, animals involve drug testing, isolation, and social deprivation will be prohibited. “28 percent of animals are being enacted”. (Maria Cantwell). Animals also target adults and kids. Side effects of rabies are white gushy slobber, and acting crazy, biting. This is dangerous to go near kids and adolescents with. “Everyday people get sick by just working on the animals”. (P.E.T.A). For example, “If people didn’t use animals, the scientist have to test new drugs on people.” People found out that animals actually have an archaic habit, which gets children sick. This is very dangerous for people to work on animals. Animals sometimes can be very crazy. For instance, …show more content…

Also that animals are also helpful because they can feed people, and keep animals healthy. Science has a responsibility to use animals to keep looking for cures for all of the horrible diseases that animals have, and make people suffer from. The horrific side of experimenting on animals is that people get sick. Animals actually have all types of diseases that are dangerous, some diseases that animals have people don’t even know about. The greater the size the deadlier the disease can

Open Document