Similarities:
Both companies, Asana and Texas Health Resources, had high employee ratings in the following categories:
Great challenges
Great atmosphere
Great rewards
Great pride
Great communication
Great bosses
Also, both companies offer several perks and programs to employees, such as wellness programs, gym memberships, leadership training, paid time off, reward programs, tuition reimbursement, and so much more. Both companies retain and recruit employees by offering work-life balance programs, compensation programs, family care, health insurance coverage, as well as, the companies community and environmental impact. As learned throughout this course, programs such as these, decrease employee turnover and increase employee motivation, involvement, and satisfaction, which in turn, is beneficial to the company's overall success.
Differences:
Texas Health Resources is not as diverse as Asana, since majority of employees are female and leadership positions are primarily held by non-minorities. Diversity at Asana is more equally distributed between male and female, minorities and non-minorities, as opposed to Texas Health Resources. However, the vast majority of Asana’s workforce is made up of
…show more content…
The less employees an institute has, the easier it seems to adapt to change. In contrast, the more employees within an organization, the more challenging it seems to adjust to change. For example, Asana consists of only 297 employees, whereas, Texas Health Resources is made up of 21,686 employees. There is a big difference in employee numbers, which may be why Texas Health Resources has a slightly lower employee rating. A company the size of Texas Health Resources may endure a harder time adjusting to change due to the amount of employees. However, according to our textbook (2012), in order to be successful, organizations must promote innovation and overcome change (ES, p.