How Did Greek Art Differ From The Parthenon?

583 Words3 Pages

Through the different periods of time values have changed and some are similar. Starting with the Greeks and the Parthenon to Rome and the human conditions through the time period. The Parthenon is a pure display of the Greek’s obsession with perfection as it is perfectly proportioned and was well planned mathematically. The sculptures used to decorate the Parthenon provides an aesthetically appealing piece of art in the form of stone. To start with, the Greeks had a building called the Parthenon. The Parthenon was very important to the Greeks because they had art located in the Parthenon. The Parthenon became part of their values and it reflects a never- ending pursuit of perfection because it was the Greeks life and values were based on art. The Parthenon had artwork done by Leonardo da Vinci. The Parthenon eventually was abused the Romans. The Greeks values were based on philosophers, religion, and especially art. The Greeks and the Romans had different values. The Romans had a very strong army they thought they could conquer the known world. …show more content…

Even though there is no evidence on how the Romans conquered the known world, they had a very powerful army and were able to conquer the known world. The commander of this army was T. Manlius who lead the army to try to conquer the world. The Middle Ages had way different values than the Greeks and Romans. The Romans took ideas of the art from the Greeks. The Roman’s values were based on modern culture. The Romans had a building that was very important to them just like the Greeks. The Roman’s building was called the Colosseum. The Colosseum was for plays and other ways of entertainment for the people of Rome. The Middle Ages had a different idea of nature of man because they believed that bad in people will show and that they born for