ipl-logo

NASA Budget Essay

556 Words3 Pages

During the 1960s, NASA has a very low budget, which was only 5% of the federal budget, meaning it was challenging to do many things involving outer space with very little money. Now, NASA only gets less than .5% from the budget. Even then with only that much money keeping rovers and continuing to send people and things out will become a big problem financially
“The budget has been eaten by the space shuttle and the low-earth-orbit space station being built two decades late to finally provide a destination for the wandering shuttle”
After Apollo, the money for space exploration has been cut down big time. The funding has become ⅕ of the budget in 1965, which is less than .8% of the federal budget. This doesn’t just cut down the money for this program, it also shortens the money for the exploration of the moon, and other planets. This program would spend an insane amount of money, that NASA might not even have …show more content…

If humans had the technology to make the surface of Mars habitable, then we’d also have the technology to make Earth habitable again, which makes colonization of Mars

Show More
Related
931 Words | 4 Pages

They are very expensive and when missions fail lots of money is lost. There are lots of factors to consider in any part of space exploration. Starting with the advantages of the rovers, one of the biggest ones would be that it allows detailed up close aspects and features of different planets without the use of an actual person. They can also go to planets that humans are not capable of going to and would most likely die of they did. A big problem in space exploration would be the danger involved.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

Is space exploration worth the cost? John F. Kennedy and Joan Vernikos think so. In John F. Kennedy's speech “Remarks at the Dedication of the Aerospace Medical Health Center,” and in Joan Vernikos passage “Is Space Exploration worth the cost.” Medical space exploration benefits human lives is JFK’s argument and Humans for space exploration is worth the cost is Joan Vernikos argument.

Read More
835 Words | 4 Pages

Should NASA fund asteroid studies? This has been a long-running debate on this question that has left NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) in utter shambles. I believe that NASA should fund asteroid studies for many reasons such as gaining money, to help save the planet and prevent danger, and to explore space and explore the possibility of living on another planet. Although other people believe that we should not fund asteroid studies because it would cause a big gap in government funds that would create a catastrophe and make for a lot more trouble than it is worth. To those people who think that clearly do not realize that it is well worth the price and is most definitely worth the trouble of solving a quick problem with

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

Firstly, the author claims that because of the many technological advances due to the "Space Race", a commitment to a manned mission to Mars will produce similar results. Although there are many similarities between committing to sending a man to the moon and to sending a man to mars, it false for the author to assume that there will be similar technological and humanitarian advances. The 1960's is a very different time period from today and as a result, it is unknown whether a manned mission to Mars will prove to be a worthy investment. Additionally, a large part of the "space Race" can be attributed to the competition between the USSR and the USA during the Cold War. The competition for becoming the leader in space technology was very fierce and was very politically driven, allowing for huge amounts of money to be invested in space technology.

Read More
936 Words | 4 Pages

For each of the piloted missions, it would cost $723 million

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

If we decide to colonize mars

Read More
1034 Words | 5 Pages

Making Mars optimal for human life requires heating up the planet. By learning from the effects of global warming the authors suggest using runaway greenhouse effect of carbon dioxide, a method to make Mars habitable is to inject synthetic greenhouse gases within Mars’ atmosphere to be able to melt the ice caps on Mars to create suitable environment for life. (Christopher, Owen, & James, 1991, p.

Read More
1189 Words | 5 Pages

Everyone may be thinking that the reasons I have given do not make up for the loss of funds put into the program, but that would be incorrect. As everything states in body paragraph two, there is a major economic income provided by NASA that most people do not know or think about. This is simply because people assume the only way something can provide an economic benefit is through consumerism and sales, while there are many ways to provide economic benefits. Since these benefits are overlooked, many people may not support NASA because it does not look like it provides any money, but it is very costly. While in truth, it is very costly, but it provides many benefits and it does, in fact, make

Read More
918 Words | 4 Pages

This meant that NASA slowed down a lot too which gave way for private companies to have more room to do the things that NASA can’t anymore. Thespacereview.com, a great sight for information on space and NASA stated, “NASA has been actively pursuing three programs for human spaceflight beyond low Earth orbit: the Space Launch System (SLS), the Orion spacecraft, and, more recently, the Deep Space Gateway. But progress on these three programs has been slow in large part due to inadequate funding.” (thespacereview.com) NASA has been wanting to do many things that would help the world of science, but because of the fact that NASA significant budget drop from 1965 to now they have been set back because of the lack on money. Washingtonpost.com, one of the biggest news papers around, proclaimed, “In 1965, it was 4.31 percent...the agency's budget will be less than one-half of 1 percent of federal spending” (washingtonpost.com)

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

After completion of the Apollo project, NASA is now in a transition as it looks for a new project to replace Apollo. There exist a need for the public to be informed of NASA’s aim and expectation, so as to provide informed consultation (Learry, 1990). As a matter of public policy, society also ought to be aware of the workings of NASA so as to continually check on the agency’s future expenditure and expectations (Committee on Meeting the Workforce Needs for the National Vision for Space Exploration, Space Studies Board, Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council, 2006). New program will ultimately have to meet the economic realities of today. As such the public has to look at whether the benefits gained from the Apollo vis-à-vis the cost.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

We should have stayed away from the space race with the soviet union and just saved money and spent it on other things. I'm not saying no to a space program but we can't keep throwing money to NASA and letting them waste it. We have to have a cheap space program. NASA is hurting our national debt and needs to be

Read More
162 Words | 1 Pages

The significance of NASA and the space exploration program goes beyond than just studying outer space. From improving the quality of life for human beings on Earth, to improving technology to both better the world and further advance our nation, NASA plays a vital role in how humans live today. Through their research, they not only work to improve life, but work to better understand our planet, and change the outlook humans have on life. Though it is no secret our country is creeping deeper into federal debt and cuts to government agencies are being made, NASA is receiving some of the worst of the federal budget cuts. As a result, NASA begins to lack the proper funding they need in order to successfully continue their research, and ultimately,

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

Space exploration is no different. The first time human’s took step on the moon in the year 1969, July 20th, marked a turning point in history. That time forward, the world would never be the same, and technology reached further lengths than ever. According to source A, “-the manned space exploration program is absolutely worth the cost.”

Read More
357 Words | 2 Pages

In the future we may be able to colonize the moon, Mars, or another orbiting space colony near the moon. Finally, we do spend the money put towards space exploration down here on Earth. My first reason was space exploration actually helps the economy. A fact that supports this reason is, “According to G. Scott Hubbard, a professor at Stanford University, “for every dollar spent on the

Read More
954 Words | 4 Pages

(“Army”, par. 5). N.A.S.A could use that money to make more space shuttles which would create more jobs and use taxpayer money on something

Read More

More about NASA Budget Essay

Related Topics

Open Document