The internet is in grave danger, with opposing threats such as the commissioner of the FCC ( Federal Communication Commission ) where three chairmans out of five is supporting the idea to abolish net neutrality. Net neutrality is the principle that service provider such as Verizon, AT&T etc must treat all data on the internet the same, not charge differently by user,content,website, platform etc. When net neutrality get abolish network provider will swoop in the action and take advantage of this and they will control the internet however they please. Ajit Pai the FCC Chairman that Trump elected back in January of 2017 and gave him a five years term, Ajit started to propose the idea of abolishing net neutrality back in April of 2017. Mr. …show more content…
One company has already sets eyes on this opportunity is Time Warner's cable now known Spectrum and Spectrum could slow down site such as Netflix,Hulu and Amazon Prime to the point it impossible to watch and they would have to switch to their prefer moving streaming which is provided by Spectrum, at a cost. During an interview with SHS senior Evan Pagliuca in which he mention ““Net neutrality repeal is just cable company trying to get more money because people are not spending money on cable package but …show more content…
Without it, accomplishing our tasks is extremely difficult and we would be the most at risk if it no longer existed. “. It’s true the chairman of FCC Ajit Pai draft on abolishing net neutrality is on December 15 of 2017, even senator asking the FCC to postpone the date but it settle on the 15th they will vote and right now it 3 member against net neutrality and only 2 are supporting it, this is your chance to speak out to our government saying that we need net neutrality convince one of the three to switch side or we will be one step away toward an un justice internet, like Ajit Pai said “ Abolishing Net Neutrality would set the internet free “ but the former FCC Chairman said "If a network operator slowed the speed of service below that which the consumer bought, it would be commercially unreasonable and therefore prohibited. If the network operator blocked access to lawful content, it would violate our no-blocking rule and therefore be doubly