ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

760 Words4 Pages

Animal Cruelty or Life-Saving Science

Imagine this, you or a loved one has caught a deadly disease with no treatment or cure. Testing on animals has become illegal, and no one has consented to be a test subject to help find a treatment or cure for this life-ending disease. What options do you have to choose from? Some people deem animal testing to be inhumane and cruel, while others believe that testing on animals, is simply part of science. We have come a long way in the development of science, and that is mostly due to being able to test on animals. Testing on animals allows for us to find treatments or cures that can ultimately prolong human life. Animal testing has created breakthroughs in science, and has also contributed to many life-saving …show more content…

Testing is done on animals because they are thought to be the closest match and best one with regards to applying this data to humans (Murnaghan). This means that whatever we find through research or experiments done on animals, directly correlates to us as humans. We share 95 percent of our genes with a mouse, making them an effective model for the human body (Understanding Animal Research). It’s hard to believe that such a tiny creature is so genetically similar to humans, with the fact that our sizes are remarkably different. There are many people who don’t like animals and don’t care what happens to them, but here is also a great majority of people who are highly against animal testing. An article from Peta states, “They linguish in pain, suffer from extreme frustration, ache with loneliness, and long to be free.” The truth of the matter is that animals themselves actually benefit from the result of animal testing. If vaccines were not tested on animals, millions of animals would have died from things like rabies or distemper. From learning, all the way down to genetics, animals are a great tool to continue saving the lives of

Show More
Related
891 Words | 4 Pages

For those of you with your beloved pets, imagine if they had to go through this! There are some people who are 100% for animal testing, while there are others who are against it, trying to make a stand. MEDICINE First off, It is needless to say, cruel to test on animals. One reason animals are expereimented on is so that we, humans can find cures to diseases and sicknesses. The funny thing is some of this research and money is put into trying to find cures for AIDS or types of cancer like HIV, sicknesses that these animals cannot develop.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

What would you do if when you got out of the shower all of your hair fell out, or someone close to you was diagnosed with a rare disease or illness that was said to be untreatable? Both of these situations could have a different outcome by continuing animal testing and learning more about how to treat diseases and the effects products have on our bodies. People argue that animal testing is inhumane, even though almost all testing that occurs is completely humane and has no harmful effects to the animals. Animal used in lab testing are usually extremely well taken care of and tests done on them are almost never harmful. Animal testing helps make products safer for humans, help scientists know more about the human body, and help make lifesaving discoveries in the medical field.

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

Schroeder, Jeff Mrs. Fischer English 8 CP / P. 2B Why Lab Mice Have Saved More Lives Than Seat Belts. Animal testing has been a fairly large subject for some time leading onto whether or not it should continue. Animal testing is research done on animals to find cure to disease and sickness. Animal testing should not be put to an end due to the fact that it gives postitive results to new medication and cure for disease and sickness and both humans and animals are both benefitted from this research. To start off, animal testing should not be put to an end because it gives positive results to new medication and cures for disease and sickness.

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Testing on animals is not accurate, it is a waste of many resources, and it is unnecessary. Animal testing is not an accurate way to find cures for humans. Almost all tests that pass on animals do not pass on humans. The reason for this is because humans and the animals being tested on are not the same genetically. It does not make sense to test on animals, because the products that are being tested are not going to be used on the animals.

Read More
1179 Words | 5 Pages

Dozens of diseases, from cancer to epilepsy, affect both animals and humans. Vaccines that treat humans benefit animals. Many other conditions are successfully treated, in both humans and animals, with antibiotics. Through research with animals, researchers can develop treatments and therapies to help both people and animals. In the other hand these experiments do use a lot of testing in a bunch of animals but due to the cause of using so many animals progress is being made by reducing the number of animals used in

Read More
752 Words | 4 Pages

Still many people see animal testing as an excellent process, due to some of its so called breakthroughs and benefits, however these people are either uneducated or choosing to ignore the faults and downsides of animal testing. Colossal amounts of animals go through excruciating and agonizing pain and suffering during the course of trails and testing, there is no need for them to endure this distress especially when sometimes it doesn't even work. One of the reasons it is not always accurate is because we are two different species and only a very limited amount of human diseases are recorded inside of the animal kingdom. These animals can not speak or control what they do so they have no way to get out of this abuse that ends up killing most of all the animals who are forced to participate. When it comes to the testing of animals many philosophical questions tend to show up, but the main thing that it arises is ethical

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

However they are wrong, not only do humans benefit, animals do too. This saves thousand and millions of human and animal lives. Those who are animal lovers will be happy to know that animal testing saved their pet/pets lives. Overall animal testing benefits everyone, both humans and animals. Animal testing can save millions animal and human lives.

Read More
753 Words | 4 Pages

Without animal research and testing, millions of lives would be lost yearly. Finding cures for diseases like anthrax, rabies, distemper, feline leukemia, and canine parvovirus helps millions of animals with diseases and cancers (5). Animal testing saves lives of both animals and humans. It advances medicines all the time, showing new cures for a number of different things (1). They show what cannot be used because of dangerous side effects.

Read More
442 Words | 2 Pages

A 2011 poll of 1,000 biomedical scientists conducted by the science journal Nature found that over 90% agreed that the use of animal testing in research is essential. The American Cancer Society, American Physiological Society, and many others advocate the use of animal testing in scientific research. Animals are very different anatomically,metabolically,and cellularly from human beings and therefore make poor test subjects. The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings. Animal testing is thought to be cruel and inhumane for the animals.

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Despite these benefits, some people believe that animals should be not be used for testing regardless of the circumstances. This essay will outline the advantages of animal testing. One of the most common arguments against animal testing is that animals make poor test subjects. While it is true that animal systems differ from human systems, there are enough similarities to apply information from animals to humans. It is a known fact that the DNA of chimpanzees is 99% similar with humans, while the genetics of mice are 98% similar.

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

Animals are used in testing instead of humans because they are very similar to humans. In fact, as stated in the article “Should Animals Be Used For Scientific or Commercial Testing?” by Pros and Cons Organization, “Chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA with humans, and mice are 98% genetically similar to humans”. Through the process animals go through a large amount of pain that may cause them even the death. Most animals that don’t die from one experiment are re-used in another experiment causing them more

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

Animals are beneficial to humans and should not be taken for granted. Animal testing should not be put to use because of how many animals have died, some animal testing did not help at all, and there are alternatives to animal testing. The number of pets that die from animal testing every year is uncanny. ¨Each year, more than 100 million animals—including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds—are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing.¨ (Collins, 2017)

Read More
613 Words | 3 Pages

(ProCon.org, Nov 2, 2017) Animal testing is an experiment in which a live animal is forced to undergo something that will likely cause them pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm and if extremely unlucky they will be killed at the end of the experiment. (crueltyfreeinternational.org, March 2, 2018) Animal testing is vital to both humans and animals as without animal research, millions of dogs, cats, birds and farm animals would be dead from more than 200 diseases, which include rabies, feline leukaemia. Today these diseases are preventable due to the vaccines developed in animal research. Furthermore, the research also enabled for the development of vaccinations against smallpox, measles and mumps and this ultimately leads to both species being cured (Consunji, T,

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is not ok for so many reasons. The first I have to say is about the hardship and pain to the animals. Animals feel pain along with humans, so why do we test on them? What if a bunch of giant animals took you from your natural home, nearly starved you, then tested on you with weird equipment in someplace strange? Yeah, pretty awful.

Read More
1039 Words | 5 Pages

The lives saved may outweigh the lives lost but it does not mean we can overlook the pain and suffering caused to these animals to get to the treatments and vaccines. People who feel that they can’t allow animal testing for any reason can choose to refuse treatments that have been created through animal tests. However, this means refusing almost all treatments that have been created. Technology is advancing every day and maybe one day, hopefully soon, animals will be replaced by machines and no longer need to suffer. Animal testing may not always be the most sound or successful way to find the answers but right now there is sometimes no other option.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document