Instead of concentrating on preparing students by giving them useful information, we learned so we could pass a crazy amount of tests? This plan is clearly watertight with no cracks in it, teachers would be head over heels for it, and students would adore it, what could possibly go wrong with this plan? Instead of concentrating on preparing students by giving them useful information Instead of learning to educate ourselves,, starting with 3rd grade we could just take tests so we are prepared for what life throws at us. When conjuring up this idea, the Board of Education was wondering how are we going to prepare our students for the real world? The Board of Education came up with the idea that life is just one big test and to best prepare for …show more content…
This in turn helps teachers because now they can give the most minimal of effort in lesson planning for the next year or so. Society will have a less confusing way to determine who to hire for what job. Since all people have the same mindset and knowledge. Discrimination in our society will cease to exist since everyone will be the same cause we’re all measured against same narrow, irrelevant set of standards. Words that discriminate us like outstanding, excellent, and advanced will quickly be erased from society. Standardize Test also benefit the economy since they’re very cheap. In the midst of the financial crisis in America, the only way to maintain the top notch quality of American education is to increase the amount of standardize test used since they are cheaper and more effective, requiring very little effort to grade. We must save money by substituting costly, human-graded test with low cost, idea-limiting scantron tests. Investing in a machine is so much cheaper. It’s more cost effective than hiring a human with opinions that could allow for human biases to skew the grades. Who needs human grader when standard tests can easily suppress free thinking and limit our