More handpicked essays just for you.
The Effects Of Gun Violence On The United States Essays
The Effects Of Gun Violence On The United States Essays
Controversies of gun control and restrictions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Another argument is, Gun laws won’t keep guns out of the hands of criminals , criminals well do anything to get there hands on a weapon. they need them to protect
The con side of gun control laws made good points as to why more laws would not be in the benefit of the people but they did not provide credible sources to increase the credibility of their claims. A lot of their references included well known newspapers such as the Chicago Tribune and the NY Times. While they did reference the Supreme Court, US Fish and Wildlife Services, and the Heritage Foundation I believe that these few sources are not enough to support their claims and make them credible. When looking at their Top Con quotes I found that they used a lot more credible sources such as US representatives, senators, and the Founder and President of Crime Prevention Research Center. Therefore they were able to make their claims more credible.
In 1987, the bill that would soon become a law and make buying guns safer was introduced in congress. This bill was named after James Brady hints the name, “Brady Bill.” James Brady was the White House Press Secretary at the time. He was permanently disabled after receiving a gunshot wound to his forehead in 1981, in the attempted Ronald Reagan assassination. This bill required licensed firearms importers, manufactures, or dealers to wait five days before selling a handgun to another person not licensed under federal law.
The law is never something to take lightly especially when the specific law is set in place to prevent the loss of human life. Gun control laws have a basis set by the federal government and are expanded upon by each individual state as they deem fit. Federal gun laws and state gun laws have their similarities and differences, but both are set in place as a barrier of protection against those who could cause bodily harm to others if equipped with such power that a gun holds. The U.S federal Government has its own set of regulations concerning firearms and the state of California builds upon them to create a stronger gun policy, meaning both sets of codes and regulations have similarities and differences, but no matter the differences, these laws are set in place to prevent massacres like the Las Vegas, Nevada shooting, and while California gun laws are built upon federal laws, they can be improved for a safer more controlled environment. Federal gun laws are the foundation for state laws and the building blocks for more advanced restrictions set by individual
On September 25 of 1789 our founding fathers constructed the Constitution of the United States, Which included the second Amendment where it allowed civilians the right as American to bear arms. On October 22,1968 president Lyndon B. Johnson signed a The Gun Control law of 1968. The Gun control act of 1968 was part of a “great society” movement by president Johnson that was initiated after the assassination of president Kennedy (Eakins). In the 1994 ban signing by president Clinton and the federal government, which imposed 19 types of military-style weapons to be banned for ten- years. This legislation was intended to reduce the gun violence and decreased national tragedies.
With so many shootings arising these days, many people wonder whether handguns should be banned or not. Some people say it is a part of American history and that they would not be here today without guns. While others believe that the country would be more peaceful and safe if the guns were illegal. The problems that come with banning guns are endless and could possibly cause many more problems than necessary or intended. Having a handgun is a way of protection and self defense.
Criminals don’t follow laws. Gun control laws are more oppressive on citizens than criminals, which is literally someone who has broken, or is breaking, a law. Why are some gun control laws and rulings so heavily pushed? Especially considering that the majority of these laws have very little actual basis aside from the “guns are scary and bad” train of thought. This is going to be going into why most of these laws, current, and proposed, make no sense such as the Magazine Capacity bans that some states are putting in place, the entirety of the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA), and the 1994 Assault Weapon Ban(AWB).
In this day and time, there are a plethora of new laws being made because of the number of homicides that have been committed, killing numerous innocent citizens. This has forced our government to try and take a stand by making these laws. Including the gun control laws, the gun control laws are why I am making my essay to begin with, I want to share my thoughts on gun control laws from a pro gun prospective. I believe that we should not have gun control laws for numerous reasons. The first reason is a gun doesn’t kill a person its man on man crime.
The Brady Act would be strength based if there were not loopholes in the law for getting guns such as not requiring background checks for private sellers, online gun dealers, and trade shows. However, new laws that close the loopholes and tighter gun control laws that include several laws are strength based because they do lower the death rates and violence caused from firearms. Research studies show a correlation between states that do have strict gun laws compared to others that are lax. One study done by the “researchers at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard School of Public Health, uses a measure of state-by-state legislative strength of gun control policies tracked by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence,
What makes guns such a controversial topic? Peoples’ opinions vary on the topic of whether we should have new gun control laws along with the prior gun control laws we already have set in place. What causes this issue to be so controversial is people debating whether there should be gun control laws due to the high crime rates. Although guns can be helpful and dangerous there should not be gun control because people still will not follow the new laws, people would still sell guns illegally, and the death rate by guns will still be the same.
According to Christopher Ingraham with the Washington Post, there are now more guns in circulation than there are people in the United States, with that number exceeding 300 million. Gun manufacturers often use the second amendment as a means to increase their sales. I think as business majors, we can all appreciate a good marketing strategy. So what exactly are the laws behind purchasing a gun? We’ll begin with background checks in Louisiana:
Gun Laws More gun control laws should not be put into place. Some people might disagree but most gun control laws that are trying to be passed are to ban rifles and some are to make it harder and almost impossible to get a gun. The NRA has sued states over this because these laws that states want to be passed are unconstitutional and infringe upon the second amendment, the Right to Bear Arms. More gun control laws should not be put into place. First off, the second amendment of the US constitution protects individual gun ownership.
People are smart and will find a way to get around the law if one is created to ban guns. People have done this with the topic of drugs; since drugs are illegal, people have resorted to get high off of new legal substances like sharpies. Using this as an example of what people do to get around the law will help prove that if guns are banned, people would create a new way of harming someone. This new harmful invention could potentially become worse that using a gun ever was. These examples go back to how the guns don’t decide if they want to kill a person, they don’t have a brain; it is the people behind the gun pulling the trigger deciding that they want to commit an illegal and harmful act upon another human being or living animal (Larry Greenemeier).
Gun control is defined as “…an effort to fight violent crime by strengthening laws on the ownership of firearms.”(Gun Control). This effort to keep guns under control is self defeating because of the controversy it creates. It is hard to keep it to the point where people do not use them for illegal reasons. This is because people have different views of right or wrong. Due to these differences, the laws on the ownership of guns are shrugged off by those who think it is right to induce crime into the public.
Gun control also limits our constitutionally derived right to own firearms. If gun control is enforced, law-abiding citizens will be forced to give up their guns and their right to own guns, while many criminals who own guns may illegally keep theirs. As the saying goes “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.” Guns are an important aspect of our society in many ways. They allow for protection, recreation, and hunting.
