ipl-logo

Why Is Abortion Morally Wrong

1983 Words8 Pages

Abortion has been a popular and controversial topic for centuries. However, the abortion procedure became more widespread in recent years with over 900,000 pregnancies in the United States of America ending in an abortion annually. (“U.S. Abortion Statistics.). While many call themselves pro-choice, pro-lifers claim abortion is wrong. Which begs the question: is abortion morally wrong, and why does it matter? Abortion is morally wrong because life begins at conception, purposely killing a human being is murder, and murder goes against the law.
One of the biggest arguments in the abortion debate is the question of when life begins. While those who support abortion, pro-choicers, claim that those who reject abortion, pro-lifers, have no scientific means to back their stand, science points to life beginning at conception. A pro-life worldview not only is logical but also corresponds with science. …show more content…

Conception is the formation of a viable zygote by the union of the male sperm and female ovum. (Conception.). This results in a woman’s pregnancy, eventually leading to the birth of a child. Professor Micheline Mathews-Roth from Harvard University Medical School said that “it is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception.” (“Why life begins at.). It would be unscientific to say that life begins farther down in the development stage. A beginning is a certain point and time that cannot be changed based on differing opinions on when life

Show More
Related
1008 Words | 5 Pages

According to the WHO, there are an estimated 40-50 million abortions every year around the globe. The dictionary definition for abortion is ‘the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy’, and people usually very absolutist about their stances regarding this topic. The two sides of the argument are those who are pro-choice or pro-life. The pro-choice side argue that it is the free will of the parent/s to decide on how to handle the pregnancy as unplanned pregnancies could mean a detrimental life for both the parent/s and the baby as the parent/s may not have the resources to support and take care of the baby, or are not ready for such big change and responsibility. On the other hand, the pro-life side argue that life begins at conception

Read More
2224 Words | 9 Pages

It is not just a physical debate, but a metaphysical one as well. (Sheldons). However, those that are pro-life do maintain that life starts at conception, and continues to grow from there. They believe that an unborn child has the same right to life as the person writing this paper, or the person reading

Read More
2099 Words | 9 Pages

Abortion is a highly debated and sensitive topic, which has been a subject of diverse opinions. It comes with complex moral, ethical, and legal implications, with various perspectives examining the arguments of Pro–choice and Pro–life, which can cause strong emotions. The Pro–choice perspective supports the fact that women should have the right to make decisions about their bodies, including abortion. On the other hand, the Pro–life perspective supports the protection of the unborn fetus, and it considers abortion as unethical. While the Pro-choice and Pro–life perspectives have different opinions about abortion, there are a few points of mutual agreement, such as the agreement on reducing the number of unintended pregnancies and how it is

Read More
1856 Words | 8 Pages

Maureen Condic of the Charlotte Lozier Institute believes that basic biological definitions can verify that life does indeed begin when the sperm and egg meet. “One of the basic insights of modern biology is that life is continuous, with living cells giving rise to new types of cells and, ultimately, to new individuals. Therefore, in considering the question of when a new human life begins, we must first address the more fundamental question of when a new cell, distinct from sperm and egg, comes into existence… The conclusion that human life begins at sperm-egg fusion is uncontested, objective, based on the universally accepted scientific method of distinguishing different cell types from each other and on ample scientific evidence. A neutral examination of the evidence merely establishes the onset of a new human life at a scientifically well-defined ‘moment of conception,’ a conclusion that unequivocally indicates that human embryos from the one-cell stage forward are indeed living individuals of the human species; i.e., human

Read More
117 Words | 1 Pages

Conclusion: Therefore an abortion is morally wrong because it destroys a human being that is already alive with a beating heart and inflicts pain to the fetus, unless the life of the mother is danger.

Read More
1340 Words | 6 Pages

In the doctrine of the Catholic Church life begins when the soul and body become joined. Drawing on the Immaculate Conception the moment when body and soul are joined is the conception of the child. (Augustine and Aquinas, catechism). The Buddha taught that life is reincarnated when intercourse occurs; in modern commentaries with current medical understanding this is now understood to be the moment of conception (Religious perspectives 524). These definitions of when life begins are such that there is no possibility of the fetus being on a gradual progression from non-life to life throughout the pregnancy; both traditions hold the view that these concepts are binary in nature.

Read More
1272 Words | 6 Pages

, human beings.” Modern medicine, specifically embryology, is very clear about this. Unborn humans at various stages may be smaller, weaker, less-developed, stranger-looking, more helpless, and less personable than other human beings, but this does not make them any less human. Keith Moore, an esteemed embryologist, argues that "Human development begins after the union of male and female gametes or germ cells during a process known as fertilization (conception)."Fertilization is a sequence of events that begins with the contact of a sperm (spermatozoon) with a secondary oocyte (ovum) and ends with the fusion of their pronuclei (the haploid nuclei of the sperm and ovum) and the mingling of their chromosomes to form a new cell. This fertilized ovum, known as a zygote, is a large diploid cell that is the beginning, or primordium, of a human being."

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

The Pro Choice side feels that individuals should have the right to choose what happens with their body. (2) Then, they argue that abortion is not murder due to the baby not being fully developed. Pro Life feels that abortion is murder, and should be considered murder in the eyes of the law. Pro Life considers a baby to be human as soon as conception occurs. Pro Life against abortion also usually has religious reasons backing their beliefs.

Read More
458 Words | 2 Pages

Many people believe that the fertilization of an egg is the moment when a human life is created. Whether they believe it for religious reasons or not, it has become a point of contention for many people. The idea that human life begins at conception is one that is not entirely supported. When an egg is fertilized it does not hold the promise of becoming a baby. It does hold the potential of becoming a child.

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

To me, life begins when the heart starts to beat. The heart starts to beat eighteen days before conception and twenty-one days after, by using it’s own blood (“About the Unborn Child” 2). Most mothers just have found out or haven’t even found out they are pregnant when the baby’s heart begins to beat, which means in my definition, they are killing a baby. But science and people need to prove and agree on what the definition of life begins. If we could just agree when it begins, we could form laws around it.

Read More
1151 Words | 5 Pages

This can also branch off into when rights start. I believe a fetus is a baby when the umbilical cord is cut because the baby isn’t dependent on the mother

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

When it comes to the controversial topic of abortion I feel that this is a complex debate. On one side you have Pro Life and on the other you have Pro Choice. Advocates of Pro Life argue that all life is precious and that it's shouldn't be up to an individual to make the determination of whether they should be allowed to seek an abortion no matter what the cause. They also argue that it should be up to the universe and mother nature to make that determination on whether that the unborn child should be born no matter what the circumstances. However, there are also others that are Pro Life advocates that believe that there are exceptions pertaining to rape, incest and medical intervention if the mother or child should be direct harm pertaining their

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

Although many would argue that the fetus is not yet a human being because it cannot survive on its own outside the uterus, but in reality human life begins at conception. The moment the egg and the sperm fuse together, a distinctively human, alive, and individual organism comes into life. Unlike cars and machineries, the fetus does not come into existence part by part. Although the fetus cannot self-sustain and must rely on the mother’s body for survival, the mother adds nothing but nutrition

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

A second reason why abortion is wrong is because it deprives the fetus from his future. When we decide to kill a fetus then we are taking away from him a future like ours. The argument is as follows : (1) it is impermissible to kill humans, who if lived, would have a future like ours, (2) if abortion is not done, the fetus would have future as we do have, (3) so it is wrong to kill the fetus (4) therefore abortion is impermissible. A similar argument was given by Don Marquis in his article “Why Abortion is Immoral”. He stated that what makes killing wrong is neither the effect on the murder, nor the effect on the victim’s relatives or friends, but the effect is on the victim himself.

Read More
1445 Words | 6 Pages

Abortion is defined as the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy. The idea of ending the emergence of a new life is too horrible to comprehend. I will prove that abortion is morally wrong through the use of my normative ethical theory. My normative ethical theory is: an act is right if it honors God and what He has created and wrong if it dishonors God and what He has created. Clearly, according to my theory, a baby is something that God has created and killing it or terminating it before it reaches full term is wrong.

Read More

More about Why Is Abortion Morally Wrong

Related Topics

Open Document