ipl-logo

Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

564 Words3 Pages

Over 100 million animals die due to animal testing in laboratories each year, over 4 million experiments have been overseen on animals in 2015 alone. Personally, I think that scientists should not test products on animals because just like humans animals experience pain too. There are also alternatives to animal testing so I see no reason that makes it necessary.
Many animals are already endangered or extinct and now many others are being killed for testing purposes. While many people think that if an animal were to lose a life it could prevent a human from losing theirs, they are forgetting that animals feel pain too. Rats are one of the most commonly used animals in experiments; they are highly intelligent and social as well. When tickled, …show more content…

The safest place for an animal is where its habitat is, and when an animal is living a life in a cage, alone, constantly subjected to terrifying and painful experiments it can be quite brutal, even for an animal.
Animal testing remains an option even though it is bad science. Results taken from animal experiments are hard to apply to humans because humans and animals are different in several aspects that affect whether the product/drug will work on a human if they did on an animal. Besides the facts, there have been many drugs tested on animals that have failed in humans. It costs nearly $2 billion to get a drug/product on the market mainly because of the inaccuracy of animal test results during human trials.
I like to believe that there is always more than one way to do something, and animal testing cases are no exception. There are many alternatives to animal testing but these are only a few of them. One of them is called “organs-on-chips”; it contains human cells grown to mimic the structure of a human’s organs system. The chips can be used test products instead of animals and can guarantee results that are more accurate. Another method is also computer modeling which has been developed to simulate human biology and the human body’s reaction to diseases. Unlike animal testing, results from these models can accurately predict how the human body system will react to new

Show More
Related
1770 Words | 8 Pages

Animal Testing: Animals Deserve Love Not Pain Cries of pain echo around the room. Animals shoved in cages much too small for them to even cower in the corners are everywhere. It is quite obvious that not one of them has ever left the room they remain in now. One glance around the room is enough to tell that these animals have never been treated like the typical house pet. Yet at the same time, they look a lot like the neighbor’s dog, or a house cat.

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

Experiments on animals are inapplicable to humans generally. In Harvard's Wyss Institute they have created

Read More
1606 Words | 7 Pages

An alternative to animal testing would be an in glass in vitro testing. This type of testing involves a study of cells in a petri dish and in the past has shown more accurate results than animal testing. This is because human cells are being used. Computer models of human molecules also can detect how toxic a substance is which is safer, more accurate, and does not require an animal test subject. But not only are these alternative methods safer, they are much less expensive.

Read More
1787 Words | 8 Pages

Supporters would argue that “nothing can substitute testing on a whole-body living thing,”, or that studying cells in a petri dish (referring to in-vitro testing) does not show a full body system, so it is inaccurate. (3) They may also say that studying on animals is the best way to predict how a medicine or treatment may affect a human without having to actually test on a human, because animals are very similar to humans. Chimps share ninety-nine percent of their DNA with humans, and mice share ninety-eight percent of their DNA with humans. Plus, all mammals have the same set of organs (heart, lungs, etc..) and function very similarly, making animals and humans susceptible to the same diseases.

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is not the most reliable way to determine if a drug is safe for human use. A study done by the U.S Food and Drug Administration showed that ninety two percent of drugs entering clinical trials fail to be approved (Capaldo, Theodora). Animal testing is also very expensive and by figuring out new ways to test drugs and products we can save millions of animals and dollars. We are now able to create computer models and simulations of human organs and the researches are able to predict the way new drugs will react in the human body (“Alternatives to Animal Testing”) Other alternatives include cell cultures, micro dosing, and even donated human tissue.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

The labs can use a method using reconstructed skin cells. Not only will this stop testing on animals, this test will be highly more accurate, and the more accurate the better. There is another method called microdosing, basically what this is, is when a human is given a very small one time drug dose. Then sophisticated imagining techniques are used to monitor how the body reacts. By using any of these methods we will cut back on animal testing and have highly more accurate results.

Read More
940 Words | 4 Pages

Animals are being tortured with drugs, chemicals, and tormented with psychological testing. I believe that animals testing should be banned on the grounds that it is not fair, not exceptionally solid, and is really harsh. Animal testing is inhumane, animals do have feelings and they do feel pain. The article written by Chaneybabe highlights the issue of animals being put to threat. He has stated his point well saying the effects and cons of sings animals for experiments.

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

The following are some facts, statistics, and data related to animal testing. Www.animal-testing.procon.org states, “research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 BC,” (1). According to hsi.org, it is estimated that more than 100 million animals worldwide are killed each year in laboratories, and “every nine out of ten candidate medicines that appear safe and effective in animal studies fail when given to humans,” (1). Only a small proportion of countries collects and publishes data concerning animal use for testing/research, so the exact amount of animals use is unknown. “95% of animals used in experiments are not protected by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), which excludes birds, rats and mice bred for research, and cold-blooded animals such as reptiles and most fish.”

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

The animals that the scientists use are bred only for the experiments “to ensure consistent data; thus, these living beings are essentially technological products brought into existence for the purpose of their scientific use” (Animal experimentation), and not taken from nature or the wild. With current technologies, animal experimentation may come out of play, but it is predicted that animal experimentation cannot be replicated exactly. Other methods to replace animal testing “include[s] computer modeling, micro-dosing, and MRI scanning, [that] will eventually replace the use of animals in medical research […] however, animal testing does provide significant benefits that are not easily replicated. While alternative technologies will reduce the reliance on animals for testing, they cannot replace animal testing all together.” (Animal

Read More
883 Words | 4 Pages

First, humans test animals for cures that are supposed to work on humans, but testing only proves how it works on different animals. Secondly, when something is tested on animals and is proven safe and effective, it can still be useless or detrimental to humans

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

Often when people hear about animal testing their immediate reaction is “This isn’t right,” or “The poor animals are being tortured for no reason.” In reality though, using animals for research testing is essential. In order to study how medicines and chemicals affect living organism; they must be tested on a living organism. This leaves the choice of humans or animals. As humans we place a high value on all living things, and even the bible states we are the masters of all living creatures, “And God said…let them (human beings) have dominion over the fish in the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the Earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the Earth.

Read More
869 Words | 4 Pages

Normally when we think of animal testing or animal research, we think of it as bad and that we need to stop this immediately. But what we need to think about is how animal research is actually benefiting us in multiple ways. As humans, we have the privilege of being on the top of the food chain and able to control what happens to animals because we are superior to them. Knowing this we should do whatever it takes to better the human race not thinking about what we're doing in the process. In order to ensure human safety and the well being of humans, animal testing should be enforced.

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

Animal Testing Should scientists use animals for scientific testing? Scientists have been using animals to test on and develop a medical treatment for thousands of years. Some people support animals testing because it saves lives for many people. Other people are against animals testing because it is not fair to harm animals. Scientists should stop using animals for scientific testing because there is different methods now exist that can replace the need for animals, using animals for scientific is more expensive than alternative methods and are waste of government research dollars, and animals are very different from human beings and therefore make poor test subject.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

Scientists continually make advances that were unthought-of before. Nevertheless, these advances need to be validated in order to be implemented, and the only way to validate their findings is by conducting many trials and receiving positive results. An example is the testing of

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

Since animal testing is cruel, inhumane, and alternative testing methods now exist, we should discontinue animal testing once and for all. For these reasons, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety of human products. To begin with, animal testing is cruel, inhumane and it violates animals’ rights. The USDA reported that in 2016, 71,370 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia at all for relief.

Read More

More about Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

Related Topics

Open Document